Should pedo be sent to jail?
ps:if youre a pedo turn yourself in.
No responses?
/pol/ support pedos?
>Jailing people for thoughtcrimes
Why?
>>55883586
I mean those who DO it.
unfortunately you can only arrest when action is taken since thought crimes is a bad road to go down
throw 'em in jail don't give a shit
>>55883195
Only when they actually do something
>>55883472
>/pol/ support pedos?
>>55883764
No. They shouldn't be sent to jail. Most adult-child sex is consensual and doesn't involve force. If it is genuine rape, then sure jail them. Not the feminized "rape".
>>55883195
Only if they act on it, sadly. For those that think it's consensual.
Dude, you are having sex with children, <13 years old.
>>55883195
>ps:if youre a pedo turn yourself in.
Turkey here's your time to shine.
>>55884756
If by children you mean <12 then no, the majority is not consensual. Coercion even without violent force is still rape buddy.
>>55884856
Your argument is the equivalent of "it's 2015!".
>>55885107
Over 90% of adult-child sex is described by the child as non-traumatic and not forceful. Your argument completely falls apart with this statistic.
Yes. And they should be institutionalized in a mental health facility for life after release, or until a cure is found. Same with sociopaths who murder people or whatever.
And I don't mean guys who fuck sixteen year olds or pedos who never act on their impulses. I mean actual pedophiles who molest actual children. The age of consent should be lowered by a few years in the U.S. because nothing good can come of feminists criminalizing PTP.
>>55885386
>mocking feminists in the same breath as defending an age of consent
Feminists raised the age of consent from as low as 7 to current levels. Stop regurgitating feminist rhetoric. Child sex isn't harmful and never was.
>>55885489
Sick fuck.
>>55885238
Citation please? That is such a fucking retarded immeasurable statistic anyway.
>>55885489
Raising aoc was feminism's second biggest success.
>>55885791
Sure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Clancy#The_Trauma_Myth
>>55885692
>Gets BTFO
>S-s-sick f-fuck! S-stop liking what I don't like!
>>55885825
It's their worst blow to society.
>>55885107
I'm not sure if this is troll or just being an american.
>>55883195
I prefer vigilantism. The state should only be for investigation, law enforcement and for traffic.
Punishment of the guilty party should be the right of a victim, or their family.
>>55886900
The wiki page you linked to says that kids don't try to stop being abused for the most part, partially because they are incapable of realizing they're being abused but also because often it is physically pleasurable. This is useful to know when treating abuse victims, not a justification of child abuse.
These are the same authors own words.
>As I hope to have made clear in the book, sexual abuse is never OK. No matter what the circumstances are, or how it impacts the victims, sexual abuse is an atrocious, despicable crime. Just because it rarely physically or psychologically damages the child does not mean it is OK. Harmfulness is not the same thing as wrongfulness. And why is it wrong? Because children are incapable of consent.
Children do not understand the meaning or significance of sexual behavior. Adults know this, and thus they are taking advantage of innocent children — using their knowledge to manipulate children into providing sexual pleasure. Sick.
>>55885489
>Child sex isn't harmful and never was.
>>55883195
Being a pedo is as bad as being a muslim>>55883472
You don't have sex with kids.
You just don't do that- its wrong, and if you do you deserve to suffer consequences.
It is so fucked up, to be an adult and realize what happened to you- Since you don't comprehend it at the time.
Don't fucking say kids wanna be diddled, they are ignorant and unable to make educated decisions- you are taking advantage of them in the most evil way possible if you convince yourself otherwise.
That being said I feel bad for people with an attraction to children and I think we should be kinder about treating it as an unfortunate disorder.
I have a lot of respect for people who admit their issues and deal with them. For people who ask for help, and want to cause no harm.
I have a lot of disgust for people who don't address issues in a healthy manner and instead drag kids into it.
>2015
>Pedosexuals are still openly and freely discriminated against
>>55887977
Zoe looks like a fucking troll compared to Anita. Das a beefy ass german bitch.
>>55887977
How have these two not been assassinated yet?
It's not illegal to be a paedophile
Daesh in this thread trying to argue for their shitty fetish.
>>55887899
If I were zapping some kid in a cage with a cattle prod, I'm pretty sure he'd understand the concept that he's being tortured. The fact that you have to literally teach, or really convince, kids that they were actually sexually abused and then call it abuse later is more like self fulfilled prophecy.
>>55887899
>The wiki page you linked to says that kids don't try to stop being abused for the most part, partially because they are incapable of realizing they're being abused
I'm not trying to argue in favor of pedophiles, but if you don't perceive an action against you as damaging in any way, how can it be abuse? Because of some definition in a book somewhere?
>This is useful to know when treating abuse victims, not a justification of child abuse.
But when you treat someone for something based on a definition instead of how the supposed victim perceived it, how do you make sure that it isn't you who is actually causing that damage? What if a sexual act was entirely consentual, but illegal, and you try to force the values that the law conveys until the view is accepted, until something that was voluntary is perceived as abuse. Wouldn't that be essentially brainwashing?
>Children do not understand the meaning or significance of sexual behavior. Adults know this, and thus they are taking advantage of innocent children ...
Same here. It assumes that just because there is a different understanding of what is going on, that there's automatically damage inflicted. This sounds more like "it's against our values, therefore it is harmful" instead of "it is harmful because someone was harmed".
This seems pretty questionable to me.
I have no idea how this looks in reality, if there are a lot of consentual cases like this or if the majority is in fact abuse, not just legally but also literally. I'm just confusing by this type of arguing.
