discuss female inferiority
>Well behaved women rarely make history.
Women rarely make history.
>>55867383
they're too worthless imo
what do women do other than get raped and bitch about it
theres a reason them and niggers couldnt vote
I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amanda_Lindhout is a female version of a hero in epic type stories and books.
Where the man would be conquering people, killing others and acquiring power and wealth, the woman gets raped, tortured and her mind warped so much that she apologises to the men that raped her and goes back to have another go.
idk if consider that inferior or not but whatever
What's there to discuss? You are just salty, cause you don't get laid, fat-ass
>>55867137
Well it's interesting . In terms of IQ (and the factors IQ correlates with such as l income, rational thinking, propensity toward crime etc) females and males share around the same mean (depending on the study).
However, there are far more male geniuses- brilliant painters, physicists , world leaders, chemists, engineers, site developers- and far more male regards- the dregs of prisons, beggars, druggies, urchins, degenerate gamblers, downies.
>>55867137
Yet men must behave at all times. Hmm...
>>55868440
Now the question should turn to
>Inferior at what?
Using IQ as a starting point, we can go further to see how the genders camaro their roles in history.
>Given a female and male of the same IQ, the physical strength and testosterone drive of the male will usually aid him in some way toward cometing tasks, even in a modern white collar world.
>Given a female and male of the same IQ, the female does not have as much incentive to work as hard, as she can fall back on marriage or a relationship almost every time
>Given a female and male of the same IQ, the female would tend to go into a more general role/field, while the male would more typically go headlong into a specialty and try to excel at it with competitive fervor and pack mentality
>Given a female and male with the same IQ, the female is still more prone to cloud the situation with emotions (the liberal women in politics for example were intelligent enough to pass law school, but fall back on muh chilluns in terms of budgetary matters , guns, refugees etc spite of cold stats
>Given a female and a male with a standard deviation difference in IQ, the lower IQ male may still provide more economic production and societal benefit, as he can be a boilermaker, HVAC tech, sanitation worker etc, whereas she may go into part time sales and love off beta bux
>>55869021
Now here's where people would say
>well economic production can't be the I my metric by which we can measure value, like
>What if the intangible value of motherhood
I agree the best possible situation for a child to be raised in is two parents, female and male, preferably the biological parents, both preferably educated with resources, with only up to about 4 biological siblings.
I agree that from the neonatal stage to teenhood, the mothers presence is vital to devwopment more than the fathers, due to how a child's psychology is.
That said, when we compare single father households to single mother housholds, we see a stark realization that the former is the greater indicator of crime, low income, depression and more in the child's life.
>>55869485
*the LATTER
shit digital keyboard + alcohol don't mix.
-women's response to oppression is to try and convince oppressors to feel bad enough to stop
-increasing influence of women in political and social arenas has long been known to be affiliated with decline in civilization
-women have lower-density grey matter in their brains, but an interconnectedness of white matter among components that allows emotions to bleed throughout the brain far more easily
-women opted for sexual utopia the moment it was opened up to them, despite control of sexuality being integral to maintaining family units and civilization
-when placed on separate islands with similar starting resources, men worked together to build civilization, women fought, sunbathed and stole from each other (pic related)
-feminism predicated entirely around carrying on 200,000 year old tradition of outsourcing problem solving onto men
-women are the most likely to advocate letting the shitskins in despite breaking homogeneity being one of the most popular civilization killers in history
-every matriarchal society in history and currently in existence has either shit the bed and died or is currently in a slightly worse state than mudhut africa
-women do better at school through rote memorization, but cannot redetermine that information once forgotten at the level of men - educating them is literally feeding facts into a turing machine
-only explanation they have for continuing to fail to keep up with men after being given every leg up society can offer is that it's actually men's fault
-can't take criticism: last time someone told them they cried when criticized they cried until he got fired
-behind every retarded victim movement, including the ones for shitskins, faggots and fatasses
-have to over-react to gain social power
Eh, maybe they're a little dumber.
