Fascism=Communism without jews
Fascism is an offense to Western civilization. A system that proposes to free the West by enslaving them? Utterly ridiculous. The only system that will cause the salvation of the western folk is free market capitalism.
>>55856239
I agree that everyone that are "anti-communist" is actually anti-fascist, they just don't know what the different words mean. They don't want to be forced into a grid of being that is very limited. That is what fascism is.
Neo-progressivism=fascism
>I don't even know what fascism is: The thread
>>55856496
>enslaving
You went full retard, never go full retard
>>55856496
>Fascism is an offense to Western civilization. A system that proposes to free the West by enslaving them? Utterly ridiculous. The only system that will cause the salvation of the western folk is free market capitalism.
This, absolutely this. Leftists often claim that capitalism and democracy cannot coexist, but in fact the opposite is true. The more government infringes on economic freedom, the more it can infringe of civic freedom.
>>55856668
How is it not enslavement? You are expected to work for the government (masquerading as "the nation") with little to no immediate gain for yourself. I love my neighbour, but not more than I love myself.
>>55856841
>How is it not enslavement? You are expected to work for the government (masquerading as "the nation") with little to no immediate gain for yourself. I love my neighbour, but not more than I love myself.
I'm as conservative as the next guy, but fascism is not the way to go. If you want to see fascism in practice, go to Syria.
>>55856516
Fascism and communism are ideologies that compete for the same followers. So you have to be anti-communist to be a fascist, and you have to be anti-facist to be a communist. Fascism directly competes with communism.
People who are supporters of something like classical liberalism are not the target audience for either fascism or communism, so while these people are a fundamental enemy, they are not the primary enemy - they are not in the competition.
Converting a fascist to a communist is trivial, converting a communist to a national socialist is trivial. This is why they are enemies.
>>55856239
>fascism
>communism
>national socialism
>absolute monarchy
>juche
>theocracy
>the south's "peculiar institution"
>etc etc
Re-label the shitburger all you want to, make up whatever bullshit excuses you want to, tyranny is tyranny is tyranny and it always sucks ass.
>>55857161
I'm arguing against fascism, not for it.
>>55856239
Describe what Fascism is and what its policies were
>>55857305
OP here, 100% this
>>55857394
Also pic related
Fascism is capitalism without the Jews.
>>55856239
Facism=lean mean communist killing machine
>ITT: People pretending Fascism is well defined
There have been all of 2 countries that called themselves fascist and both where concurred less than 40 years after adopting it. Fascism is more of an idea than an actual form of government nowadays.
>>55857262
You took that word for word off of molynucks and you haven't finished listening to all the Bowden lectures and you're wrong.
>>55857492
No, fascism is capitalism with the government removing anything it gets salty about from the open market. Things like American music, the media and any form of literiture which disagreed with them.
>>55857492
Fascism is state capitalism. The state controls the economy, but on paper the industry is still owned by private interests. Those private interests can be Jews or gentiles, doesn't really matter.
>>55856239
Can we have some real discussion about fascism? I only know what the Marxists say about it. Any supporters here? What us fascism really?
>>55856239
Yeah, pretty much. The only biggest divide as to why commies and fascists hate each other was just to differentiate from each other, essentially.
>>55857305
When the power is the hand of the few usually its the moment where the things actually begin to work, free from the crippling effect of democracy and burocracy. Even during tyranny there are benefits
>>55857979
those "private interests" are almost always high ranking party members
>>55858122
It's another form of socialism, in which the State is essentially the highest being, authoritarian, and the economy is centrally planned. Corporations are "allowed" to exist, but it's generally party members that own and plan everything.
>>55858122
Add a touch of nationalism to whatever the Marxists are saying.
>>55858293
Right. And they private interests don't exactly own the industry either, they mostly just profit from having their name attached to it. The state can and will take it away or assert full control as they find necessary. Price controls, etc.
