>You are leader of a country in which there are two significant groups
>one religious group whose religion opposes homosexuality
>the other group consisting of homosexuals
>The aim is to satisfy both parties, while preserving the free speech and liberties of both parties
What do you do?
>>55788671
Segregation
>>55788911
It appears we have a winner.
Drop bombs on both.
>>55788671
Shoot them
Get out the pen and compass
It's time for a partitioning
>>55788671
>The aim is to satisfy both parties
Fuck that, I'm going to remove kebab.
>>55788911
sounds about right
Homosexuals cannot be a significant group though. Gays are usually a bare 1 or 2 %
Kill the homos. They aren't going to reproduce anyway.
>>55789988
Gay and gay sympathisers then.
>>55788671
Support the religious group since they will reproduce and provide future generations for the country.
>>55788911
This. Keep the religous in their neighborhoods and the faggots in their mental asylums where they belong.
>>55788671
Postpone action until science advances enough to cure homosexualism.
Then force the cure on all the homosexuals.
Once they become straight they will realize the disgusting error of their ways and thank us.
> reveal that their religious leader / founder was a homo
> sit back
> watch hilarity ensue
>>55788671
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8L8NopVwdg
>>55790143
Regardless, I fail to see an issue. As a secular democracy which believes in liberty and free speech both sides are perfectly free to say whatever they want about the other
