Can someone explains me again why we're not invading Syria and Iraq exactly ?
It's easier to just bonb endlessly? What, do you want more of your countrymen dead?
>>55731986
A war with boots on the ground has an extremely high political cost. We aren't there yet imho. Next big happening and we might get to the tipping point
What does it achieve? Other than more attacks like the one in Paris?
Unless you go balls deep on a fucking crusade and exterminate every last goddamn muslim, burn down every hut and leave nothing but bodies and dirt in your wake, you wont achieve anything. But we cant do that because "m-muh human rights" Fucking heretics
The last time we did that, it caused this whole mess.
>>55731986
Because they are invading you
>>55731986
One step at a time, we'll get there. Takes a few days for all the investigations and whatnot.
>>55731986
Well the intel on the reason we went into Iraq was shit.
Liberals still in shock it was their party that did it.
When the opportunity to go in happened 2 yrs ago, Ed Miliband stop it being discussed in the commons, Cameron got that!
next day Obama ruled out intervention and Assad stayed and we started army the moderate rebels instead
>>55731986
>Can someone explains me again why we're not invading Syria and Iraq exactly ?
The last time France tried imperialism with invading Vietnam, they just had to fuck things over and have daddy America bail them out.
And oil is too cheap and plentiful to warrant a war over oil.
We need to redraw the maps, then if ISIS is still around, bomb the shit out of that territory.
My whole damn facebook has turned into frogville.
What the fuck did happened that was so big compared to the rape and murder Muslims have already been doing in Europe?
>>55732116
>It's easier to just bonb endlessly?
Doesn't seem very effective
>>55732246
I think the public opinion is ready for the cost.
>>55732289
It achieves destroying what is literally a COUNTRY run by terrorists. Granted there always will be terrorists but MAYBE we can draw the line of them running countries with millions of souls.
>>55732422
Jokes on them, we're more.
>>55732441
Pretty sure the intel is right this time.
>>55732483
> invading Vietnam
As usual, burgers can't into History
>>55731986
russians are about to go in so why bother
>What does it achieve? Other than more attacks like the one in Paris?
If you end the war in Syria and let Russia or somebody install a brutal puppet dictator who keeps the mudslimes in line for fear of brutal repurcussions, then perhaps we can live in peace like we used to.
Iraq would also need another Sadaam, too
>>55732559
yes senpai
>>55731986
because our nigger president fucked it up so bad no one wants to spend another $2 trillion to start all over again
>>55732540
>rape and murder Muslims have already been doing in Europe?
because this time it's real and not just in /pol/'s mind ?
>>55732322
/thread
but hey, it really jacked up the Dow jones.
>>55731986
Gee OP... I wonder why...
>>55732568
Because we don't trust them. Also we're taking out Assad too.
>>55732441
Dubya was a liberal?
>Brits in charge of recent history.
>>55732559
I'd be all for a military intervention. We might get to cut off Isis's head. No pun intended
>>55731986
That pic is french special forces with Saudi special kebab forces.
You have your answer.
>>55732694
>Also we're taking out Assad too
But thats never gonna happen. Kek
>>55732718
he means Tony Blair
oh wait
>Blair was a liberal?
>>55732694
and replace him with what? the moderate isis (opposition)?
not to mention he dindu nuffin
>>55732890
>and replace him with what?
FRENCH NEO COLONY ! HELL YEAH !
>>55732246
>We
Italy.
Italy you have a few hundred years of military failure to make up for.
Don't disappoint.
We have to colonise or Nuke Syria/Irak , the only way
>>55733042
Democracy is made for people NOT criminally insane. When you give, several times, the choice and they keep choosing terrorism, you remove the choice.
>>55732804
>Blair was a liberal?
Well his party now wants him in the hague and some say he is son of Thatcher.
Labour never had things so good, now they are finished after electing a full blown left of trotsky Hamas loving marxist kek
We knew it was dodgy grounds, but we were not about to let you go in alone.
>>55731986
Because the russians beat you to it. And it is supposed to be a good thing for all of mankind if Assad remains in power and drops a barrel bomb on any fucking demon that utters the word of jihad in a manner that he misses the times of FSA or ISIS. But SJW all across the world have way too much influence to let a western military do that.
Muslims got desperate and scared to shit when russians jumped in the game, even Assad himself.
You cant do a terror attack in russia and not expect your entire family not be butchered slowly in front of you before you are buried alive.
Not to mention what happens to your town and all your friends, unless one of them is ready to accept the russian overlords.
They certainly will have to get boots on the ground sooner or later.
You on the other hand are fucked, all of europe in fact.
Try your best to see the upcoming troubles for their good side, and that is eurofaggotry sjw's and all that degenerates will disappear or be silenced violently after the war against islam is won.
Slobo told you, he fucking warned you when nothing could be proven against him, he really did. Then he had to be poisoned.
>>55731986
>invading Syria and Iraq
that's a declaration of war and rusia is helping syria right now
your concept of global politics is flawed
its should be helping syria get rid of isis not declaring war on a war torn nation
we should be nuking the house of saud, kill the weed at the roots
>>55733617
You cant do that because you will shit all over your project to overthrow Assad and fuck Syria up as you did Libya.
You cant just switch goals like that, and it was your tax money that was supposed to do it.
>>55731986
You shouldn't have to but our coward president abandoned the Iraq war without so much as a status of forces agreement. Then he pussyfooted with Assad and Russia enough to turn the Syrian civil war into a full-blown shitstorm and create the vacuum where ISIS has thrived. So yes much of the blame goes to the nigger Obama.
>>55731986
>why we're not invading Syria and Iraq
cause it worked out soooooo well last time
>>55731986
As an amerifat what happened yesterday in Paris disgusted and greatly upset me.
I want troops in Syria and Iraq and I wanted them there yesterday.
>>55731986
>Because you cannot even deal with your own shit?
>Maybe?
>A better question would be why havent you surrendered yet?
>>55731986
You sure you have enough baguettes for that?
>>55733398
>We knew it was dodgy grounds, but we were not about to let you go in alone.
I love you britbongs like brothers.
>>55731986
America's not willing to commit to another invasion of Iraq. Syria has too much international support. We're also coming off over a decade of "War on Terror" with nothing to show for it.
It's easier and safer to just use cruise missiles to bomb the shit out of people. A full out invasion is pointless because ISIS is an international criminal organization and not a Government. You'd have better luck with drones and helicopter raids.
>>55732322
/thread
>>55732441
yeah but the coalition of the willing invaded iraq only because a dumb sandnigger claimed he had seen a factory which produce chemical warfare agents and the german intelligence agency belived him.
But now there is a good reason
>>55733042
i agree
You guys are fucking stupid.
After 9/11, the USA invaded AFGHANISTAN. Nobody cared, either. Iraq was later and a separate issue.
France has every right to go into Syria if they want to do so.
>>55732694
>>55732890
>>55734992 whatever you say faggot
Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.
Iraq "continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability" and "actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability" posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."
Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."
Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".
Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.
Members of al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.
Iraq's "continu[ing] to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations.
Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.
The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, and those who aided or harbored them.
The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.
The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.
Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.
>>55734992
lmao you're not doing shit
>>55731986
it will probably take another big terrorist attack in the US for that to happen
>>55731986
It's easier to tell them FUCK OFF, WE'RE FULL and let them remove each other
>>55735523
>William Kristol pls...
>>55732694
>we're taking out Assad
Yeah, senpai, this is the reason these things keep happening to France.
Stop interfering, stop funding terrorism and the terrorism will stop.
>>55735855
We already had that in Boston as far as seemingly foreign attacks go. Even though that black church dude stated plainly he wanted to start a race war and shit he's not being tried as a terrorist.
Because we fund ISIS with proxys.
It was the solution to having no boots on the ground. Would you have a few dindu nothing white boys like Travis Schmitt and Brett Smith risking their life for a pipeline or fund rebels to taking over? Why not have Muhammad Al-Hamas or some other noble muslim do it for you?
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29004253
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/whos-funding-isis-wealthy-gulf-angel-investors-officials-say-n208006
http://www.businessinsider.com/isis-funding-us-allies-2014-6
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/06/world/meast/isis-funding/
This is why we are slow to act because ISIS and ISIL is a asset to controlling interests. Refugees are collateral damage and have a right to be mad.
>>55731986
liberals would complain about civilian casualties
>>55731986
"BECAUSE IT SUPPORTS EVIL MURRICA'S IMPERIALISTIC EFFORTS HURR DURR"
- Every Eurokekold ever
Refugee crisis best day of my life. Fucking keks.
>>55731986
Are these a bunch of airsoft faggots or something?
>wonky goggles on the visible guys in tan
>3 is looking away from his weapon
>vanity shot when they're in a safe area
>>55731986
yes, that's been working out brilliantly this past decade, hasn't it
