>yfw you realize it's Anglo guilt but liberals blame Anglo crimes on whites
>>55486361
It probably was 10 million
still genocide. The native American still deserve more help and reparations.
>>55486361
Who cares about those natives? useless fucks are just like African niggers- no technological breakthroughs made them weak and useless for the masterrace of whites to take over.
>>55486361
>>55486488
>>55486361
i love how they just make up numbers and ignore the fact the vast majority were killed by disease.
>>55486361
>liberals in charge of knowing spanish and other europoops wiped out natives all over north and south america in the 1500's
Anglo-American Freemasonry/Cabala
>>55486361
>Der Ewige Deutscher at it again railing against anglos
>>55486488
Wasn't it even less? Most of the deaths were from disease, not some "genocide"
>>55486361
Casualties of war resulting from conflicts between multiple primitive nations. Military deaths are not a holocaust.
>>55486361
Yeah lets just put the railroads, modern medicine, the Internet, nuclear power all on hold so the natives can continue to dance a round their huts howling at the moon. You know the left used to value progress and science and it used to have nothing but disdain for primitivism and superstition.
100 million?
Nigger there wasn't even 7million in the US lmao
>>55486361
100 millions?!?
There was only 1-2 millions indians back then.
+ The Vikings came first to america
>>55486361
Blacks killed my Neandertal ancestors!!!
>>55486361
100 million? I'm gonna need peer-reviewed sauce on that.
>>55486488
reparations? i'll start doing that when every other nation pays off the people it killed
>>55486361
>100 million people existing in the Americas when Europeans landed
That many didn't exist even before the pre-European plague.
>>55486361
Disease and armed conflict casualties do not equal genocide.
>>55486488
>reparations
no.
we aren't candyass snowflakes.
>>55490486
There was a national policy literally named "The Indian Removal Act. Where Indians where removed. And in some cases like the trail of tears they where removed by force. That counts as genocide by the modern definition so if you are a SJW faggot there is a legal argument to be made here.
>>55486488
The 10 million figure are also bullshit.
1-2 millions indians are more correct.
Don't forget the whole world population was around 500 millions in this time.
>>55490691
Scholars rely on archaeological data and written records from settlers from the Old World. Most scholars writing at the end of the 19th century estimated the pre-Columbian population at about 10 million; by the end of the 20th century the scholarly consensus had shifted to about 50 million, with some arguing for 100 million or more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americas
> History
>>55486361
Shut up, you are more anglo then any Engishman.
>>55486361
>>55486488
what face when thousands of native americans genocided each other while Charlemagne was still alive?
> http://news.discovery.com/history/genocide-native-americans-ethnic-cleansing.htm
This probably wasn't an isolated incident, out of the several millenia before Europeans arrived.
> wut do
Add it to the pile of other historical myths meant to induce guilt and passify the target population.
>>55486361
>muh 100 gorilion
>>55486488
Americans didn't do it, you're thinking of Spain. Trail of tears wasn't all that bad. Mostly because 90% of the Natives had already been wiped out by disease and the Spanish.
>>55486361
There was no genocide. they sold us their land for some stupid beads and then died because their immune systems couldn't handle european diseases
>>55490836
>Face composite for Belgium
Literally why?
It's a fake country. It isn't like France or Norway, hell half of it ought to be in France.
It would be like having a separate composites for Baden and Wurttemberg, or Aachen and Trier.
