Can someone more well versed in economics tell me what the fuck this guy is talking about?
>>55448150
>Capitalism (spelled with a capital C as if that's a thing) is softcore Nazism...
That person doesn't know what they're talking about, so how could anyone else possibly explain it to you?
>>55448150
He's convinced National Socialism isn't Socialism because of some chart he saw
>>55448150
How can Communism be softcore socialism when it's exactly the same thing + authoritarian goverment? This guy is a bullshiter
>>55448509
He responded to a comment I made that Socialism is softcore Communism, and Marx himself even stated it's the transitional period between Capitalism and Socialism. I don't think he read it.
Also, pic related...
I want YouTube intellecutals to die.
>>55448150
He's conflating economic policy with social policy.
Don't listen to him.
>>55448150
He's retarded. Nazis are outside the left/right spectrum.
>>55448150
>What I'm trying to say is; die in a fire.
he spelled out pretty well what he intended
>>55448150
He is talking about placing political systems and economic systems onto some bullshit chart, and then claiming that the chart proves his assertions. He's a moron.
>>55448150
He somehow thinks that capitalism is at all in sync with Nazism because of a chart he saw online once.
>>55449953
WHICH YEAR IS IT???
>>55449413
>b-but its a nolan chart
So are Nolan Charts being used by retarded Liberals as a scapegoat so they can feel like they know something? Look at this, I don't even...
Alright I give up.
Apparently KARL MARX'S VIEWS and thoughts on Communism and Socialismdon't matter anymore because he died in 1883. This is beyond retarded. Are all Liberals this dumb?
>>55451224
It's not the year 1883
>>55451284
I mean fuck man all I did was say how he said that Socialism was the transitional point between Capitalism and Communism, and it makes perfect sense. How is that made invalid by him dying in 1883? Do you not understand how dumb that sounds?
>>55451345
But it's the year 2015
>>55451424
And?
>>55451643
2 0 1 5
0
1
5
>>55451780
s o
w h a t
h
a
t
>>55448150
yes, one probably could, but that image isn't an economic argument
>>55451824
N O T 1 8 8 3
O
T
1
8
8
3
literally buzzwords the post
<Any year not excluding current year>
Caring what anyone on the internet says
>>55448150
>Can someone more well versed in economics tell me what the fuck this guy is talking about?
I presume he doesn't make a distinction between economic and political systems so he himself doesn't know what he is talking about
