>It is licit for the military police to invade homes, aiming to search for evidence without a warrant, as long as supported by reasons found by agents, being justified the exceptional cases in writing, under penalty of disciplinary punishment, civil or penal. This was the decision of the Supreme Federal Court Assembly this Thursday the 5th.
http://www.breaking-news.ca/breaking-brazilian-supreme-court-rules-police-can-enter-homes-without-a-warrant/
>>55445401
glad im not in that shithole.
>>55445401
Commie superstate incoming.
And their police is know for being one of the most violently brutal in the world. It is completely militarized. Watch this movie:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eodyqcxtL4M
Brazil has a government?
>>55446150
/thread
>>55445401
Well since you don't have reading comprehension,
It basically means that the Brazilian police can search and seize without a warrant provided they already have some proof of law breaking.
>being justified
>THE EXCEPTIONAL CASES
>in writing
>under penalty of punishment
What this boils down to, is that (in a perfect world) the Brazilian police do not need to wait for a warrant when they have overwhelming evidence of criminal activity.
Let's imagine a sting op just bought crack from someone on the street,
Now they can just follow this guy to his hidey hole, forcibly enter and get all the evidence, instead of waiting however long it takes.
>muh rights
Again, reading comprehension.
You only have rights when you aren't violating other's rights.
>>55446567
>being this much of a bootlicker
>>55446661
>bootlicker
If someone was selling my son crack and I knew who and where, I'd be okay with the police not needing to wait 12 hours for a court to approve the warrant.
Get fucked asshole.
>>55446721
>durgs are bad mmmkay?
>>55446761
I thought the CIA's charter explicitly denies the ability to operate on US soil.
>>55445401
Wasn't this already the case?
Without negative rights and the private ownership of firearms, it's a formality for your government to bother spelling this out.
