Rand Paul
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Rand Paul
I didn't watch the debate, but Twitter is all abuzz about Rand Paul nailing Donald Trump on China not being apart of the TPP. Is this true?
except he couldn't even comprehend/didnt hear what the guy a couple meters away from him was saying. yes elect a deaf man, that will go well
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/21891-secretary-john-kerry-invites-russia-and-china-into-tpp
Nope
>>55419667
China will be in the TPP, so it's splitting hairs really
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/21891-secretary-john-kerry-invites-russia-and-china-into-tpp
>>55419667
Trump said that China would come in through the back door and take advantage. He never said China is a part of it. Even the moderator told Rand that China would be looking to take advantage.
>>55419771
>>55419916
>Same exact link
I see the Trump Internet Defense Force has its response ready.
>>55419667
VOTE RAND
http://drudgereport.com/now2.htm
>>55420029
If I were to just simply say "no you're wrong" it wouldnt be a compelling case. Evidence has been provided, and the fact it's being used repeatedly shows how easy it is to refute the "he got stumped" meme.
Trump never said the TPP includes China but that if passed, the TPP could give China an advantage in trade.
>>55420015
>Trump said that China would come in through the back door and take advantage. He never said China is a part of it. Even the moderator told Rand that China would be looking to take advantage.
This. Randlets are desperate as fuck tonight.
>>55419737
Doesn't he wear a hearing aid?
>>55419667
Rand is just a flavor of the week, the next pawn to try and stop Trump.
Rand is nothing.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/21891-secretary-john-kerry-invites-russia-and-china-into-tpp
>>55421039
dont matter Trump looked like an idiot
>>55421365
>idiot
>was right
Hi Rand
>>55421365
Not really. Everyone is complimenting Trump for being more professional and respectful tonight.
>>55420360
China was invited and isn't participating in the near future by their own choice.
It follows that they see no tangible benefit from it since they don't want to participate. Yet Trump wants people to believe that this agreement that has no input from China is somehow framed to benefit China. It makes no sense, but it falls nicely within his original rhetoric.
Thank you for actually presenting an argument instead of being like other Trumpfags though.
>Butters favorited this tweet
LEL
>>55421976
He just was staying out of the debate because he has no fucking idea what he is talking about when it comes to foreign policy.
