Daily reminder that stonehenge was built over 6000 years ago and that England is in fact the oldest/first civilization on earth
You may bow, peasants
And oh how they danced. The little children of Stonehenge Beneath the haunted moon.
>>55391535
We've sunk a long way now though haven't we?
>>55391535
Neanderthals must have made at least over 90 men move those pillars because there is no way in fuk HUMANS could have moved them.
>>55391535
>babylon was built over 11k years ago
>humanity has existed with the ability to make tools for over 450 million years
you're so far off it's terrible.
>>55391535
you have a tiny dick
>>55391535
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%87atalh%C3%B6y%C3%BCk
China and India have you beat senpai
Holy shit, I'm triggered.
Stone Henge was built by the Grimaldi africans, and has nothing to do with your civilization.
>Blacks being the original race once occupied virtually every corner of the globe. Britain was no exception. The Grimaldi African man is known to have occupied Europe in ancient times. Blacks have been living in Britain from prehistoric times to the present era.
>Irish tradition tells of a giant-like race of Africans headed by a king with a retinue of priests called Fomorians. They were depicted as gloomy sea giants who brought their skills from Africa via Spain.
>The original Celtic priesthood were Blacks. The White Druids had nothing to do with the construction of Stonehenge since it predated their emergence by several centuries.
Look up the queens pagan ceremony on her coronation
, some illuminati shit right their
>>55391868
OP is indeed a faggot, but the first civilisation was arguably the Sumerians
Also are you sure homo sapiens have been around half a billion years?
>>55392038
DAS RITE WE STILL IS QUEENZ N' SHIT
>>55391868
Wrong, the uruk are barely as old as us and never built anything as impressive as stonehenge at that time. Also 6000yo is a conservative estimate, the monument could be considerably older.
I understand you've been lied to by the mesopotamic jew, but please do your research.
>>55391535
Don't forget about that lad with a big knob that's drawn on a hill. He's massive so he must be from when there were giants.
>>55392205
Give me a single example of a structure as old as stonehenge and of the same magnitude.
I'll be waiting.
>>55393114
I did it already.
see
>>55391877
>>55393148
It's only 7000bc, stonehenge is much older
Next
>>55393421
You said 6000 years ago on the OP. That is 4000 bc.
What are the actual dates for Stonehenge then?
>>55393523
10000 or older.
>>55393570
Newgrange most probably. Or Dowth.
>>55391788
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMMy9t0TJNE
>>55391535
redditfrog
>>55391535
stone henge is celtic
>>55393570
Source? All I find is there are some mesolithic postholes from 8000bc, but the monument appearing between 4000-3000bc.
Jewkipedia gives Göbleki Tepe in Turkey as the oldest monument (7850bc).
>>55391535
too bad you're german now, anglo.
>>55393114
>Give me a single example of a structure as old as stonehenge and of the same magnitude.
How about the Kufu Pyramid you dumb Bongfuck? And they're more than just a bunch of rubbish stones stacked together I'll tell you that?
>>55393852
>Argentina
>Being a credible source on historical matters
>>55391535
I did not know black people were in England then, but makes sense. It is a fact every ancient building made was made by black people
>>55394030
i hope you realize that stone henge is older than that pyramid
>>55394030
>believing the jewgle
Go watch some more c u c k porn, caitlyn
That's not even true. Let's not go "we wuz kings" route. As far as we can tell, civilization came from the fertile crescent.
>>55391967
>look up grimaldi stonehenge
>literally one result on jewgle
Bullshit. Grimaldi is an italian name anyway, and current Monaco royal name. (which is pretty much italy.)
![newgrange-doehlg[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9TveFrO.jpg "newgrange-doehlg[1].jpg")
>>55391535
You've just been outclassed m8
![artist-impression-of-construction-of-temples-at-gc3b6bekli-tepe[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/glG9aq6.jpg "artist-impression-of-construction-of-temples-at-gc3b6bekli-tepe[1].jpg")
>>55391535
>6000 years ago
>oldest
bitches please
>>55393842
>Dolmens are known by a variety of names in other languages, including Irish: dolmain, Galician and Portuguese: anta
>The rarer forms anta and ganda also appear. In the Basque Country, they are attributed to the jentilak, a race of giants.
>Of other Celtic languages, Welsh: cromlech was borrowed into English and quoit is commonly used in English in Cornwall.
So it appears that big stone structures are related to the celts? Interesting.
>>55394054
You're surely giving a great fame to your nation with that post.
>mfw
>>55391967
>being triggered by black people
>says every country has black people in it since the dawn of time.
I mean just because your entire country is filled with black people doesn't mean ours is.
>>55393880
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheddar_Man
>He found two people who shared the same mtDNA as Cheddar Man, because around 10% of Europeans belong to Haplogroup U5
>>55393114
Newgrange, Ireland
>>55394238
>grange
>only 3500bc old
Get on my level, potato nigger reject
>>55391535
The oldest cave paintings are in Europe.
The oldest music instruments are in Europe.
The oldest statues are in Europe.
Why would this be surprising?
bro..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3212829/World-s-oldest-wooden-statue-TWICE-old-pyramids-New-analysis-reveals-Shigir-Idol-ancient-thought.html
>>55391967
If we're the descendants of those people that makes them english.
>>55395152
>AYY LMAO
That's some scary shit you got there son
>>55395152
Yeah, it was an english boat that sank which was carrying it. Dates match the stonehenge culture.
>>55393852
Göbleki tepe is probably 10,000
There is also one in south east asia at around 12,500
mainstream archaeology has a vested interest in keeping these truth under wraps though
All the flood myths are factual - actual evidence has been gathered all across the world.
Civilization is MUCH older than previously thought - it's actually impossible to even guess at how old it could be
>>55394238
Teletubbies
>>55391967
You are the dumbass
>>55396065
This desu.
Evola and other authors consider this proof of cycles in humanity. We are on pure speculation, but it raises interesting points.
Like, some consider that ancient unexplained structures (like Yonaguni) and primitives are proof that modern humans aren't the first ones. Humanity reached a high technological development at some point, but also a total decadence that ended in the collapse of civilization. Then, after everything was destroyed, only the remnants of the lower clases and perhaps some of the high remained alive (esotericists link this with the ice age and the indoeuropeans landlocked in the arctic) and we started again, and that influenced myths or ideas like the Yugas in hinduism.
Think about it, if all information is digitalized and dependant of internet, and there is a nuclear war that destroys everything and all knowledge is lost.
Humanity will start again from the few survivors, adapting to the climate, etc and with some 'memory' that there was another world before.
It's crazy, but not totally farfetched IMO.
>>55391535
o-ok
>>55396470
I forget the exact amount of years, but pretty much every single trace of our civilization would disappear in around 10,000 years. Not even a nuke needed. Only rock structures would survive.
The sphinx was definitely built way before .
Also interest tidbit, the fact that all the myths say they were warned in advance of the catastrophe. They ascribe this to "the gods" but it could very well have been a telescope and knowledge of its trajectory. They built super structures encoded with advanced math as a time capsule of sorts.
Anyways - as interesting as this stuff is, it is useless to ponder over. Everyone on /pol/ should be actively improving themselves and preparing for the inevitable .
cheers argentina bro
>>55391535
>Daily reminder that stonehenge was built over 6000 years ago and that England is in fact the oldest/first civilization on earth
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/wooden-statue-found-russian-peat-6354495
>Wooden statue found in Russian peat bog was made 11,000 years ago and is twice as old as Pyramids
>The statue is 6,000 years older than Stonehenge
And you were saying?
>>55396926
>The sphinx was definitely built way before
It was most likely built by khafre or kufu of the 4th dynasty. That's roughly 2500bc. About same age as the giza pyramids.
But they are like children when compared to ancient england. Or albion if you like.
>>55397206
see >>55395983
learn 2 read B4 you post, tbqh family
>>55396926
True, I've read about the sphinx. It apparently has some kind of damage on the base that can be done only by water, and if recall correctly such posibility was only probable in around 11.000 years ago.
>Everyone on /pol/ should be actively improving themselves and preparing for the inevitable .
Agreed
Cheers m8
>>55397340
But the structures in England were clearly made by a previous people.
The Indoeuropean invasions in Europe are after those were made. Not even the celts were there probably.
Maybe the Tuatha de dannan vs the Fomoire story has some truth on it.
>>55391535
WE WUZ DRUIDS AND SHIT
While your ancestors were putting up blocks of rock indians were writing the vedas
>hmmmmm what do these slabs if rocks mean
Theyre just fucking slabs of rocks some pale apes put up
>>55397555
This is what stonehenge looked like at the same time or before.
As >>55393852 confirmed, there were postholes supporting the megastructure already as far as 8000bc. The stone were actually moved again from a previous site and fused with a new day/harvest ritual.
Also stonehenge is not just a dumb of rocks of an ancient temple, it was a sun clock. We know that they were advanced enough for proto-pythagorean geometry with the placement of the stones.
>>55391535
See: Mesopotamia.
Those city-states have been around awhile.
>>55397770
Wrong.
The Vedas were created (originally transmited orally) when the aryans entered in North India, around 1500 bc. The vedas weren't even composed by the natives, but by the invading Indoeuropeans.
>>55397770
Nice try sasquash
>>55397831
>This is what stonehenge looked like at the same time or before.
still looks shit m8
>>55397895
postholes confirm superstructure.
You're gonna have to try harder, mesopotamian shill.
>>55391868
We were barely multicellular 450 mya
>>55391535
We had a good run lads
>>55397934
Let me know when you build finally something that lasts.
>>55397831
Where's the rest of the rocks nigger
>>55398210
Ask your dad when he gets back,
>>55398124
>Let me know when you build finally something that lasts.
Didn't you get that memo in 1776 :^)
>>55398567
Not sure. Must have got lost in the mail.
>>55398646
Mohammed, pls.
>>55391773
haha I like it.
>>55391535
Conquered by a Norman bastard in 1066. Feels good brah.
>>55400784
Pedro please paint.
>>55397907
damn, even the vedas were made by whites
is there anything white people didn't accomplish? amazing
>>55402542
Yes
>monotheism
>circumcission
>chinese ideograms
>gunpowder
and others probably
>>55402721
Hinduism is monotheistic so that's out
circumcision sucks and Jews literally suck bleeding baby cock so no thanks
>>55393842
No it's not you utter spastic.
Fuck sake get your shit together
It's pre celtic
>>55402838
Hinduism is not monotheistic, its monistic.
Everything cames from a single thing that cannot be defined, is not the same as Yahweh or Allah.
There are monoteistic developments later in hinduism but very late. Hinduism is just another regional version of Indoeuropean polytheism.
>>55402838
>hinduism
>monotheistic
Wat
>>55402838
Versions of Hinduism today are monotheistic, but the Vedic religion brought into India thousands of years ago was polytheistic, like all other native Indo-European religions.
>>55394821
Go fuck yourself ugly brit.
>>55403538
>>55403499
>>55403485
all the Gods is but an expression of one God called Brahman.
>>55404103
Erhm... actually Brahman isn't a god in the sense we consider god in christianity or the other abrahamic religions.
The brahman is something beyond everything that cannot be defined because defining it will limit it. I don't remember the exact hymn but somewhere it says that 'Brahman' isn't even the name, just a word to refer to that trascendental principle.
Ancient indians used a way to define things by what they aren't: isn't this, isn't that, etc, and you are left with something that isn't definible by any way, at least by the senses or even the spirit.
It is a 'principle' far more abstract than the other gods. The Brahman is defined as a 'god' with a life from which every yuga, mahayuga, and cycle of manu complete a day on his 'life', but is more like an idea for what the universe is (as if brahman = universe).
Still Brahman is not a god in the religious sense, there are no prayers, temples or anything dedicated to it.
>>55404471
Probably such a concept was part of the original indoeuropean mythology, as the gods are considered as expansions of something way beyond in ancient Greece and other branches. Maybe the ideas of 'God' and the Demiurge in gnosticism have any influence from that.
>>55391535
its the oldest place where to worshipp the devil
>gg wp being proud of illness
>>55405998
Those are some nice tits tbqh
>>55391535
>mfw muh heritage is English
