Best US presidents. What does /pol/ think?
William Henry Harrison was the least bad. FDR was a mass murderer and war criminal.
Bretty gud OP 11/10
FDR was a pinko commie. Him and Woodrow Wilson should have their graves dug up and their bodies tossed into the nearest incinerator.
Nixon.
>>55356045
Washington, Jefferson, Coolidge, Nixon,
I'd say Hoover based on the fact that he has the best dam.
>>55356045
1)Jackson
2)Kennedy
3)Polk
4)Jefferson
5)Teddy Rossesevelt
>>55356045
Jackson has become a bit of a meme president on /pol/ so I'll go with Eisenhower.
>>55356384
>2)Kennedy
Kennedy is a wipe
Vietnam and Bay of pigs were major fuck-ups
>>55356417
Eisenhower was FDR lite but at least he got rid of the Mexicans
>>55356045
The best president imho, is Grover Cleveland.
FDR fucking waged war against Mein Fuher. Fuck him.
>>55356045
>prolonged the great depression
>closet socialist
>USSR supporter
>married his cousin
>died of polio before he even got to press the big shiny red nuke button
I come from the future.
>>55356513
Benjamin Friedman, an insider of American foreign policies, actually said USA was fighting for the wrong side. Kek.
Not sure if this is true but kek.
Jfk, if he wasn't assassinated by Jews.
Washington, Lincoln, FDR, LBJ. The only correct answer.
>>55356456
Anybody who defies the kikes at that level gets my respect instantly.
Wilson most definitely.
>>55357163
Why are all your favorite presidents warmongers?
>>55356194
nixon was excellent in terms of foreign policy
Trump will be the best
Barack Hussein Obama. He taught me the most important lesson of all-- black lives, in fact, don't matter.
>>55357163
No no no, Washington, and Lincoln are good guys. FDR and LBJ were villains. You forget that FDR was a warmonger against the strongest European nation at the time and LBJ was the progenitor of libkek politics and SJWs.
>>55357782
Fuck you.
>>55358366
just a bit of bants family. You know I love y'all.
>>55356045
>OP uses FDR
Which made him among the best? His retarded economic policies which deepened and extended a depression felt in other countries as moderate but turned in our own county into the (capitalized) Great Depression? Or when he worked against the will of 70% of American to stay neutral in WWII to issue dictates to the Japanese, backed by an embargo of oil and steel exports which forced their hand and led to us being attacked by them? An attack his own policy (for the aforementioned cause) fostered, but against which, to minimize the expected damage to our armed forces, he not so much as lifted a finger, but rather put them in harms way instead? Was he great for how thoroughly penetrated his administration was by Soviet agents? The ones who secured and passed onto them designs for the atomic bomb? Perhaps its when he gave the OK for the Soviets to take Berlin and grab half of Europe, establishing the conditions of a forty year superpower showdown? Perchance it was his intransigence in thwarting every peace feeler from the Japanese who resisted his pontificate Unconditional Surrender terms because they wanted to keep their Emperor (which they ultimately did anyway), delaying the end of the war in the Pacific until after the Soviets had invaded Korea and sectioned off the hermit kingdom North Korea (which promptly led to our next foreign war)?
I'm curious.
>>55356233
>Washington, shit, wall st owned shit, retarded shit
FTFY
>>55360630
You bring up some strong arguments against him. My line of thought is more concerned with Americas transition to a superpower during his presidency and the longevity of a lot of his policies.
Who would you pick?
