>Religious children are meaner than their secular counterparts, study finds
What does this mean /b/?
I thought religious people were supposed to be more moral than non-religious people because they follow the bible and go to church.
https://www.yahoo.com/parenting/religious-kids-arent-as-good-at-sharing-study-221423445.html
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/06/religious-children-less-altruistic-secular-kids-study
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3307460/Does-growing-religious-family-make-MEAN-Christian-Muslim-children-altruistic-offspring-atheists.html?ito=social-facebook
>>55310296
Yeah yeah, yet another magical study showing the religion is bad or something.
Kind of tired of the constant narrative.
It is enough to make me want to turn religious.
>>55310296
This is /pol/, not /shithole/
And no, never went to church in minor life and still on never smoked nor comiyted crime
>>55310296
Religion is a pissing contest to the vast majority of people on this planet. It's nothing but a tool for them.
>>55310296
islamic children are fucked in the head
>>55310296
Religion fucks with the mind and deadens ones senses so it makes sense that religious children would behave badly.
>>55312500
tfw 5 years old and the leb kids on the bus would pull my hair
>>55310296
>/b/?
Wrong board senpai.
>sharing
Wew glad we have the commie here to tell us what's right :^)
>>55310296
it means religious kids are alphas and secular pussies are betas
>>55312551
More like religious parents teach their kids responsibility. Not being generous in a game does not mean not being generous when it counts. Like how Christians are for real life causes.
>>55310296
Regardless of what this study says, I found that kids in public schools were far meaner than kids in parochial schools.
>>55310296
I'm gonna go out there and say that the study is flawed. Religious beliefs are far too varied for such a blanket conclusion. Further, claiming that you're religious isn't the same as practicing religious teachings in your daily life.
