The message is simple:
>Disarm cops
>Arm Feminists
>>55292202
Why the fuck does the Muricans wants Guns if they don't use it againts those scums !??
>>55292202
>implying they would even know how to use them
>implying they won't give up after firing a single round because it's too loud and the recoil is too strong
>>55292202
>liberals won't use guns anyways
>but they want to disarm cops
Litterally no guns ever then.
>arm feminists
Are they under the impression that they aren't allowed to own guns, or are they trying to assert female privilege by asking thirsty betas to donate guns to them?
>>55292202
Since they want unarmed cops does that mean they're opposed to gun control for civilians?
Are are they just literally fucking retarded?
>women don't even know about the 2nd amendment
Wew, no wonder they think banning guns can be done by executive order.
Why can't they take responsibility for arming themselves? If can't be that hard in 'merrica.
Why don't they just buy their own guys and get an open carry licence?
>>55293969
Fuck off ane eat another cheeseburger. Make me two or three while you are at it.
>>55292202
>arm feminists
Damn that's some thought provoking dialogue in that poster.
Its almost as if we don't have some kind of law or right that gives us the power to bear arms with impunity.
>>55293969
>liberals
>thinking one step ahead
well memed my friend
>>55292202
>Simple message
>Simple people.
Literally "The group of people I am a part of is superior to another group of people"
Despite the fact that "cop" is a profession and there is no (arguable) privileged or automatic entry into this group.
Despite the fact that, especially lulzy, that the implication of their argument is that cops misuse violence and feminists instead should be the ones who are "judge, jury and executioner".
