>>55171573
>blacks consistently shit in every category
>surely this is the whites fault!
Liberals can't even grasp basic math.

>>55171573
At this point in the election cycle I inevitably consider starting a new career as a terrorist.

Drug laws are designed to hurt the poor and minorities.

We should also legalize theft, violence, and murder because those are also leading causes of poor people and minorities being imprisoned.

>>55171573
I'll be voting Webb whether or not he decides to run Independent. Both sides are utter shit

>>55171573
we need to take matters into our own hands now. the time to rise up is now

>>55171867
>voted yes on extending Patriot act wiretaps

I have a hard time considering him either

>>55171573
>saying she can't understand why black people have higher suspensions and expulsions

Maybe if she sent Chelsea to a DC Public School instead of Sidwell Friends, she would understand.

>>55172030
Oh god these fucking agents make me sick. You say this shit and cry when Dylan roof does what you say.

>>55172449
>/this
The bad news is Fox News has Hillary picked.

They spend all their time criticizing the Republican Candidates.

I heard one on Fox say that "Hillary is paying the political price and that is what she cares about." Take that "price" as you will. I think she had paid off the network. Another interpretation is they are comparing her to a martyr, while attacking the Republicans.

>>55174304
Bill O'Reilly wrote a book to make Reagan look bad and tonight attacked a Reagan defender, angrily calling him a hack.

Fox is liberal as hell.

>>55171573
>>55171606
>>55172449

Clinton doesn't actually believe this shit, she'll say and do anything for votes. She's a psychopath, if you think she actually cares about anyone else other than herself and her legacy, you're mistaken. I guarentee she hates fags, trannies, niggers, etc just as much, if not more than /pol/.

Sanders might actually care though, he's a Louie CucK.

>>55175461

I believe what she says is genuine. Have you read some of her e-mail leaks? She's liberal as fuck and she's a jew puppet. There's no doubt in my mind she actually believes the shit she spews from her mouth.

She's a fucking communist, through and through.

We're all thinking it.

>>55174380
i watched that. the guy was a hack. O'Reilly was right.

he didn't write a book to make reagan look bad. the book supposedly praises reagan

>>55176031
OP here. As much as I dislike her, I still don't think she's a communist. That's just a stupid buzzword from republicans who are too scared to list the real reasons she sucks.

>>55176073
He wasn't a hack, he made O'Reilly look like an idiot for writing his book without complete sources and asking for data later just so that he could claim he asked for it. O'Reilly's been doing that for years. All of his books are just edgy enough to create some controversy, but still lick the ass of whoever the subject is.

>>55171573
>naming Trayvon Martin as an example of a victim of inequality rather than as a criminal

except that Trayvon Martin wasn't a criminal

>>55176437
>Trayvon Martin
He was, actually. The items he bought were for making a street drug. And all the forensic evidence showed that he returned to the scene to assault Zimmerman first, even though he had several minutes of a head start to run home when Zimmerman had lost him.

That's not to mention the things Martin had done before that day.

>>55171573

>(CNN) A 9-year-old boy killed in Chicago this week was "lured" into an alley and shot in a gang-related attack, authorities said.

>"Tyshawn Lee was murdered in probably the most abhorrent, cowardly, unfathomable crime that I've witnessed in 35 years of policing," Chicago Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy told reporters Thursday.

>"We're pretty certain that this is not an accident. He was not a bystander."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/06/us/chicago-tyshawn-lee-shooting/

This is clearly white people's fault.

>>55176622
If you watch the interviews, the mother can barely even give a shit to "beg" for the police to find the killers even though she probably knows well aware who it was, and the father was all "I don't want no retaliation, what's done is done" which basically means he accepts his son being butchered as payment for whatever he did to them.

These people are all scum.

>>55176437
>drug dealer
>illegal firearms
>violent outbursts
>thief

How was he not a criminal again?

>>55176495
>skittles and iced tea = drugs

>And all the forensic evidence showed that he returned to the scene to assault Zimmerman first, even though he had several minutes of a head start to run home when Zimmerman had lost him.
no it doesn't. All it showed was that Trayvon could have run home in the time it took Zimmerman to find him again. If, after he lost sight of Zimmermman, he was walking slowly, or stopped - and why shouldn't he since he's since on a public sidewalk and having a conversation on his phone - then Zimmerman would have caught up to him before he made it. There's zero evidence that he turned around in order to find Zimmerman, which is nonsensical anyway as he would have no way of knowing where Zimmerman was.

>That's not to mention the things Martin had done before that day.
a few highschool suspensions, all for petty shit like truancy and defacing school property. zero arrests, zero convictions

>>55176330
>>55176031
As a libertarian Socialist I find it laughable that you could call Hilary a Communist. Yes, she's left-of-republican and yes she's left-of-center relative to other americans but she's still a corporate shill with extensive ties to banking, supports personal autonomy and is in favour of a largely unregulated free-market. These are all right of center.

>>55176769
He bought Arizona Watermelon Fruit Juice Cocktail, which combined with Skittles and stuff like Nyquil are ingredients for making the street drug Lean. His Facebook posts indicated that he used it regularly.

And yes, sorry, the forensic evidence does show that he assaulted Zimmerman first, that he circled back around to get the drop on him, and beat him against the ground. Go look at the physical locations of where everything occurred, listen to the timestamps of the phone calls, etc.

You can either choose to believe he's some innocent kid or you can go look these things up yourself, you don't have to take my word for it.

>>55176769
>muh feelins>attested facts certified in open court

It's like you didn't even watch the trial and just proven false media talking points (which hold no factual or legal base).

>>55171573
>mingling the murder of the 9 year old kid by black gangsters in the same sentence as mentioning cops as if to ignore black violence as the leading source of black murders

Christ, bitch probably doesn't even know he was killed because his dad is a gang member

She probably won't mention that he, nor anyone else, isn't talking to the police

>>55171573
I cringed when I heard Bernie call for free college again

>>55176970
what the fuck, i just looked this up, lean is real. but why not just skip the candy & red drank, and just take the robitussin / codeine?

>>55176759
>drug dealer
he was suspended once for having a marijuana pipe and an empty bag containing marijuana residue. He didn't even have any marijuana on him (which is kind of a prerequisite for dealing) and there's no evidence he ever sold any of the stuff, or even that he was a regular user.

>illegal firearms
no illegal firearm was ever found. he talked about guns, that's it. By that logic everyone on /k/ is a violent criminal.

>violent outbursts
again, he talked about fights but that was never one of the reasons he was suspended.

>thief
again, no real evidence for this. What the campus police described as 'stolen goods and a burglary tool' was a bunch jewellery and a screwdriver. The thing is, they never linked the jewellery to any actual theft - if it was stolen the description would have been logged with the local PD. Nor did they explain what Trayvon was supposed to have broken into. For all anyone knows the jewellery did belong to a friend and the screwdriver was just for shop class or something.

File: Derailment Bingo.jpg (188 KB, 400x523) Image search: [Google]

188 KB, 400x523

She must love derailment bingo!

File: 1432398606261.jpg (514 KB, 1600x1131) Image search: [Google]

514 KB, 1600x1131

>>55177089
>EE DINDU NUFFIN
Ebin.

File: 1446081266925.jpg (43 KB, 491x524) Image search: [Google]

43 KB, 491x524

>>55177089
Doesn't matter. Zman was ACQUITTED in open court by a jury of his peers. Every aspect of the case painfully combed over. All the evidence showed Zman did nothing wrong. Nothing. Wrong. Your opinion on it is irrelevant as it is not supported by facts. Travon acted in a criminal manner which caused his own death.

>>55177089
Sometimes it's good for people to have an advocate, but you're advocating the wrong person.

You don't really believe some of the stuff you're saying, do you? Come on, based on everything we know about that kid, statistically the screwdriver was for getting lockers open and the jewelry belonged to other students. This is a kid who used drugs and lauded what a gangster he was on Facebook. Search Google Images for like "Trayvon gangster" and see for yourself.

He was a violent thief and drug abuser. There's really no point in debating it. He didn't necessarily deserve to die, but he shouldn't have tried to kill Zimmerman.

>>55177089
eh was a go boi he wz goin to da chruch lookn forwrd to collage

>>55176970
>you can go look these things up yourself
>implying you didn't learn all this from the echochamber that is the conservative blogosphere

Zimmerman was following Trayvon along a road until trayvon got to the alley that led to his house. Instead of following trayvon directly Zimmerman, assuming that trayvon was a criminal trying to get away, headed for the community's main gate t cut him off. When Zimmerman didn't find him there he says he gave up (but remember we only have his word for this). Either way Zimmerman then started walking up the path that trayvon would have to walk down in order to get to his house. So you see, if trayvon had wanted a confrontation with Zimmerman he would have turned around and headed back to the road; he had no way of knowing that Zimmerman had left the road and was no longer behind him. If he had merely kept walking down the path towards his house he would have run into Zimmerman coming up the path from the community's main gate. The time stamps only prove that Trayvon COULD have got home within that time, but he had no reason to hurry; in fact since he was on his phone to his girlfriend he probably wanted to finish the conversation before he went home to his parents.

As far as I can see, Zimmerman and Trayvon encountered each other by accident. Most likely Zimmerman then tried to stop trayvon because he believed him to be a criminal (unless you believe that, having followed him through the neighbourhood, Zimmerman would just have walked past trayvon). There is literally no way of knowing whether Zimmerman or trayvon got physical first - only two people were there and one of them is dead. But my money is on the guy who was armed and stalking people through the neighbourhood at night as being the instigator.

>>55171573
>She makes me sick.
liberals dont want to help black people they want them to stay in their mud so they forever vote democrats.

>>55177489
Buddy I'm not conservative, I don't read that shit. I specifically looked up the police reports because you can't trust either side of the media.

Your account is completely wrong. Trayvon saw Zimmerman and ran. He *ran*. He knew someone was following him. Zimmerman chased after him, you can hear it in the police calls. He loses Trayvon. Trayvon has *several minutes* to escape this man and get home, but he doesn't. Instead, he circles back around the apartment building, in the opposite direction of his home, and attacks Zimmerman.

I'm telling you, go look at the reports, listen to the calls, and look at the maps.

>>55177489
Proof? Got any proof to go along with your [wrong] opinion? Why have you kept quiet all this time, you could have been the person that seen to this poor innocent childs justice.

>>55177469
>He was a violent thief and drug abuser
He was never arrested or even suspended from school for fighting. Even if he was a drug user, even if he might have been a thief, there is no evidence that he was violent. All people ever present in terms of evidence is a few dumb facebook posts which could have come from half the teens in America.

>Come on, based on everything we know about that kid, statistically the screwdriver was for getting lockers open and the jewelry belonged to other students.
maybe. Then again, maybe not. I mean, if that quantity of jewellery had been stolen it would almost certainly have been reported, yet the police were never able to link it to any thefts. It's suggestive, maybe, but it's hardly the smoking gun conservatives make it out to be.

>This is a kid who used drugs and lauded what a gangster he was on Facebook.
come on - how unusual is this really for a teenager? Honestly, Trayvon strikes me as the suburban-white-kid-who's-listened-to-too-much-rap sort, except that ironically he happened to be black.

>>55177441
>Zimmerman was acquitted therefore Trayvon was convicted
this is not how justice works. All Zimmerman's acquittal means is that the state did not have enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had murdered Trayvon.

>>55177569
well if you're so confident that your facts are right just post your sources and I'll be more than happy to take a look at them.

>>55171843
Holy shit. Theft, violence, and murder have victims you idiot. Drugs only hurt the people who do them. idgaf if you want to do drugs as long as you don't infringe on my life.

>>55178097
Look, i know you don't want to admit it but trayvon got himself killed. End of story. There is zero evidence Zman engaged the physical altercation. Maybe you should consider why trayvon didn't call 911 himself if he felt so threatened. Why he didn't just go home or to a friends house. Why the prosecutor surpressed evidence of the severity of Zimmermans wounds. When i first heard the story, i was on trayvons side. As more and more evidence became public, it was obviously a political witch hunt. Or you can just keep spouting the same tired shit because it makes feel good.

>>55178199
>the state did not have enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable

Because it doesn't exist. Please, do enlighten us all, how does justice work?

>>55178446
>There is zero evidence Zman engaged the physical altercation
you mean apart from the bullet wound in Trayvon's chest.

>Maybe you should consider why trayvon didn't call 911 himself if he felt so threatened. Why he didn't just go home or to a friends house.
the point is that he didn't feel particularly threatened. As soon as he lost Zimmerman he forgot about him and slowed down, which allowed Zimmerman to catch him before he reached home

>Why the prosecutor surpressed evidence of the severity of Zimmermans wounds
except that the medical examiner testified that Zimmerman's wounds weren't severe, consistent only with a single punch and certainly not the result of having his head pounded repeatedly onto the concrete.

>When i first heard the story, i was on trayvons side. As more and more evidence became public, it was obviously a political witch hunt.
you mean that you were on trayvons side, then when the liberal media turned it into a black vs. white thing you got pissed and started looking for reasons for them to be wrong.

>Or you can just keep spouting the same tired shit because it makes feel good.
I don't have a stake in this fight one way for the other. I just dislike illogic and feelings-based reasoning. It is illogical to assume, with no evidence one way or the other, that the unarmed teenager who was just walking home started the fight, rather than the armed man who was prowling the neighbourhood looking for trouble. And the only reason you think so is because the partisan divide in America has become so pathologically bitter that when the left took up the Trayvon Martin case as a cause celebre the right automatically to prove Zimmerman was a saint and trayvon a criminal. It's gotten to the point where if one side said water was wet the other would argue with them.

>>55176970
>forensic evidence
But what about the non-forensic evidence?

Seriously, you could just write, "evidence".

>>55178736
>engaged
>bullet in chest
>i dont know how to into reading comprehension
good job making sure no one else is going to read any of that other dumb shit you typed out.
look at all that work you did for nothing.
faggot.

File: 1351148348804.jpg (67 KB, 445x545) Image search: [Google]

67 KB, 445x545

>>55176930
>As a libertarian Socialist
...

what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. May God have mercy on your soul.

>>55178736
This >>55178893 i stopped read right there at bullet wound. Engaged. Started. Began. There is zero evidence Zimmerman engaged/started/began the physical altercation. Your theory, and thats all what it is, has no legs to stand on. By the way, that bullets path proved it was fired upward into trayvons chest, collaborating with Zimmermans statement. He fire 1 round from flate on his back into Trayvons chest while he was straddling Zman. The wounds on Zman head also collaborated with his statement, after being knocked to the ground Trayvon sat on his chest and repeatedly struck him multiple times in the head. Justifiable homicide. Justifiable being the key word.

>>55178893
I'm starting to get to you, aren't I?

Also, that's not really the proper usage of 'engaged'. He could have said 'engaged in', as in 'participate in', or he could have said 'began the', but 'engaged the' doesn't make much sense. But fine, if you want to take it in the sense:

>There is zero evidence Zman began the physical altercation

There is zero evidence who began the physical altercation one way or the other. Maybe trayvon threw the first punch, or maybe Zimmerman grabbed trayvon as he tried to walk away and then trayvon threw a punch. Unless Zimmerman changes his story there is literally no way to know for sure either way. We can only make educated guesses.

>>55179313
>He fire 1 round from flate on his back into Trayvons chest while he was straddling Zman. The wounds on Zman head also collaborated with his statement, after being knocked to the ground Trayvon sat on his chest and repeatedly struck him multiple times in the head
all completely untrue

>>55179366
>Unless Zimmerman changes his story there is literally no way to know for sure either way.

Why would he change his story if his orginal statement was telling the truth? Why do you keep speculating on the events as public record has it, i.e. the facts of the case? Why do you think you know anything about the American judicial system?

>>55179487
That's wierd, court records say otherwise, as testified by a forensics pathologist.

>>55178736
>you mean apart from the bullet wound in Trayvon's chest.

The bullet wound does not itself give much indication who started the altercation. If anything it slightly points to Trayvon starting it, as he could only be shot in the chest if he turned around rather than kept going.

>As soon as he lost Zimmerman he forgot about him

How does this make sense?

>except that the medical examiner testified that Zimmerman's wounds weren't severe, consistent only with a single punch and certainly not the result of having his head pounded repeatedly onto the concrete.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMQo3YrEniU

The headwound is clearly visible. A wound like this would not happen on grass. There is nothing else in the situation that explains why he would have it except for falling on a hard surface.

What you might be confused about is the difference between someone repeatedly pounding your head iinto the pavement, and attempting to pound your head into the pavement and succeeding once or twice. The latter is still an attempt at your life.

It is factually incorrect that the wounds were consistent with only a single punch - when he's got wounds on the front and back of the head.

>It is illogical to assume, with no evidence one way or the other, that the unarmed teenager who was just walking home started the fight, rather than the armed man who was prowling the neighbourhood looking for trouble.

No, it isn't.

Trayvon had no reason to believe Zimmerman was armed. Including ths information which only became apparat after the event gives a biased impression of the situation at the time.

You use the vague and wooly phrasing "looking for trouble". An alternative might be: "Looking to prevent trouble".

I am also a fan of logic. Your post is however grossly illogical. It is illogical to claim that the bullet wound in Trayvon's chest is evidence Zimmerman started the altercation, and it's illogical to claim Zs wounds were consistent only with one punch.

>>55179842
>and it's illogical to claim Zs wounds were consistent only with one punch.
that's not what the ME at the trial said.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-george-zimmerman-medical-examiner-20130702-story.html

>>55179841
>That's wierd, court records say otherwise, as testified by a forensics pathologist.
provide link

>>55171573
>privileged older white woman can't understand how black culture inherently keeps itself from advancing
>why can't they just act white?
>has probably never been into a primarily black school and seen how truly primitive and tribalistic these kids are

>>55180122
You're misrepresenting the article.

>The attorney and doctor sparred over different possible events, with O’Mara seeking to expand the number of blows and the doctor trying to keep them to no more than three. Rao refused to commit to a specific number of the maximum number of blows that would be consistent with the injuries on Zimmerman, but agreed with scenarios that could be more than half a dozen.

>>55180142

http://m.wftv.com/news/news/local/george-zimmerman-video-blog-archive/nYHgf/

Here sense you obviously didn't watch it live, watch here the whole trial. Everything. Every claim you've made will be refuted. Even with a biased judge, and she was, the prosecution had no case. If the prosecutions case was the Titanic, the prosecutor was the band. Zimmermans defense, the truth, was the iceberg. Of course you will watch none of it, why admit to being wrong when feeling right feels better.

>>55180122
Maybe you're confused about the term "consistent with".

A piece of evidence could be consistent with several courses of actions. Trayvon getting shot in the chest is consistent with Zimmerman shooting him at a distance, and Zimmerman shooting him at close range. "Consistent with" simply means "does not refute". X can be consistent with Y and Z a the same time. So the wounds may be consistent with a single punch, but as the article says, also consistent with multiple.

>>55180387
the ME's original estimate was one blow. What the defence lawyer pressed her she had to expand that because although she couldn't explicitly rule out scenarios that involved more than one blow. You know how lawyers work - the defence lawyer asks a question and because the ME can't outright prove him wrong he gets to say that she "agreed" with him.

One punch is most likely. Either way, it was not a severe beating and certainly couldn't have been the result of Zimmerman getting his head pounded on concrete multiple times.

>>55180535
>http://m.wftv.com/news/news/local/george-zimmerman-video-blog-archive/nYHgf/
that's great.

In order to speed things up, why don't you point out the bit with the pathologist's testimony

>>55180652
Oh, there should really be a law preventing these defense lawyers from getting to say things like that! Why should defense lawyers get to say such things?

She can't rule out multiple blows, so there's that. The rear head wound is only consistent with hitting the back of his head on the sidewalk, so whether he got bashed into it once or twice or five times isn't very important. He also would obviously resist having his head pushed down, so "bashed his head repeatedly" could well be interpreted as "attempted to bash his head repeatedly and succeeded once or twice".

I would be lying if I said I wasn't hoping for some major disaster that shakes up humanity and forces us as a species to rethink everything we care about.

Mostly I just want a small piece of property with a small little house, a small blacksmith shop, and a couple of Apple and peach trees.

>>55180707
Fuck you lime sucker. You got your pudding, now eat it. You're the one who with the dispute not me. Wonna know the truth, earn it. If you are willing to admit you COULD be wrong, you'll watch it all. If not, just claim victory now and stomp around your ash pile. Blissful in your ignorance, because it feels better.

>>55180832
or, Trayvon hit him once and he backed into something. There were several trees in the area they were fighting in, so he could have hit his head on a branch. Zimmerman neither had fractures nor even bruises, only one or two scratches, which isn't consistent with being hit in the head with any force.

>Oh, there should really be a law preventing these defense lawyers from getting to say things like that! Why should defense lawyers get to say such things?
I'm simply saying that there's a gap between the best possible scenario for the defence and the likely scenario.

>>55180908
You don't actually know where to find the pathologist's testimony, do you? You just know that even if I do watch all of it and find a flaw in your argument I'll be hours too late to come back and post a refutation.

>Blissful in your ignorance, because it feels better.
projection at its finest

File: rtr328bf[1].jpg (338 KB, 2240x1488) Image search: [Google]

338 KB, 2240x1488

>>55181084
>or, Trayvon hit him once and he backed into something.

No, his head wound is not consistent with "backing into" a branch.

>Zimmerman neither had fractures nor even bruises, only one or two scratches

Contradicted by image.

>>55176622
No Al Sharpton or BLM or Mobs when a real innocent kid gets executed.

>>55181199
>>55181084
>>55180707
>>55180652
>>55180142
>>55180122
>>55179487
>>55179366
>>55178736
>>55178199
>>55178097
>>55177489
>>55177089
>>55176769
>>55176437

Did you even watch the fucking trail?

>>55181199
Of course i don't remember the day of a single witness from a trial 2.5 years ago. Would you? You have have the information, which was a 10 second google search away to begin with. Like i said you won't watch any of it, you'd rather feel right than change your opinion. Your ignorance out shines your smug lazy view.

>why should i prove myself wrong?
>if i was wrong about this, what else could i be wrong about?
>everything?
>nothing?
>i like my view, so it's right.
>better stay the course then.


This is laziness at its worst. Like i said, i believed Trayvon was murdered by an over zealous community watchmen playing cop, as the media originally reported the story. I admitted i was wrong. Can you?

>>55176769
God, shut the fuck up.

>>55181325
I count two scratches - deep scratches, yes, but still just scratches - no bruise and no fracture (according to the medical report).

Also, does that really look to you like the result of his head being pounded into concrete paving?

>>55181856
>which was a 10 second google search away to begin with
well if it's just a ten second google search away, why not give me the link.

>i believed Trayvon was murdered by an over zealous community watchmen playing cop, as the media originally reported the story
>I admitted i was wrong (when /pol/ started telling me it's version)
the fact that you are easily led is not relevant to this discussion.

>>55182129
god I love pissing you people off. For all you call reddit and tumblr echo chambers you're just as bad.

Well, maybe not AS bad. If this was reddit I'd have been downvoted into oblivion and probably banned from the subreddit by now, and if this was tumblr I'd have had a dead cat sent to my house. But still.

>>55171573
Let me lay this out for you, 2012 was very informative for democrats.

Obama won over Romney, definitively. But only with the turnout of nearly all minorities. If only 10% less blacks went out to vote, or 5% less women, it would have been a tie or even a win for Romney.

That's why longterm Clinton supporter Soros has funded this BlackLivesMatter campaign. Hillary NEEDS black votes to have any chance next year. She doesn't just want them, if she doesn't get Obama level turnout, she loses.

Let me reiterate: If Hillary doesn't get the same black voter turnout as Obama, she loses.

Obviously it's an uphill climb. She's not the first black president like Obama was. So how can her supporters deliver EVERY black voter to the polls? Instigation. Instigate them with racial tension. Make racism a daily concept for YEARS leading up to the election.

That's the gamble anyway. The hope that young black voters will look at some crusty old white bitch and think "dat ho will gibsmedat." It's a longshot, but it's also her only shot.

>>55182210
>well if it's just a ten second google search away, why not give me the link.
I did, you are just to lazy to find the relevant info to you specific beliefs

>I admitted i was wrong (when /pol/ started telling me it's version)
>the fact that you are easily led is not relevant to this discussion.

The sad thing is you don't even see the irony. The only three things you have proven here is that you are lazy, smug, and ignorant. Good show.

>>55178097
> in a fight club
> punched a bus driver earlier that day
> t-there's no signs of him being violent

>>55178446
This. Everyone makes it a witch hunt and calls into question Zimmerman's character and trayvons but the facts are only influenced by character not defined by it. The facts are trayvons attacked Zimmerman without sufficient provocation, following somebody isn't provocation, the struggled over the gun when Zimmerman went down and trayvons got killed. PS trayvons is a shit name and should have been killed anyway

>>55179487
Really? Cause you would know you nosy redcoat

>>55171573
>republicans are corrupt lying sacks of shit

Look at your own party, bro.

>>55181325
Let's not forget, ANY head injury can have serious consequences. That's why curbstomping is considered attempted murder

>>55177489
That's a cool story. Obviously you've never dealt with black people in the states. I have more times than I would have liked to. Maybe your right, though. Doubt it.

File: 1444202387465.jpg (217 KB, 970x840) Image search: [Google]

217 KB, 970x840

>>55171573
Idk man, I think black people should hold themselves up like anyone else in america, I'm a firm believer in free market capitalism and the idea of subsidizing poverty is ridiculous. However, there is not a doubt in my mind that the war on drugs absolutely upholds a form of institutionalized racism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHb23-puvLI