https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiKfWdXXfIs
MORE CO2 IN THE AIR = MORE PLANT GROWTH AND SPECIES PRESERVATION
GET REKT BERNIE COMMIE FAGGOTS
Cucks on suicide watch
>Dyson
Not a climatologist so his opinion is obviously worthless.
>>53769785
>Dyson
>Known for Dyson Sphere
>Alien Megastructure on /sci/ and /pol/
>Climate Change faggot
>Ayy LMAO hype slained
>>53769937
so lets just trust 6,000,000 worthless shitbag journalists and politicians instead
muh 6 gorillion scientists agree
>you will never travel to the stars on a nuclear butt plug why live
CLIMATE CHANGE ACTUALLY GOOD
OH GOD DAMN BERNIE CONFIRMED MOST RETARDED ELDERLY JEW ON THE PLANET
OH GOD DAMN
>>53769937
>climatologist
>>53769785
Sadly, that does not mean "better crops". Tests in controlled conditions have found crop plants (wheat, I think, iirc) grows more plant, but the grains are less nutritious.
![atmospheric_spectral_absorption[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/1jyPpIP.png "atmospheric_spectral_absorption[1].png")
>>53769785
CO2 wouldn't be the problem anyway, wheter climate change is real or not
>>53769937
>climatologist
Am I a shipost scientist yet?
>>53769785
>MORE CO2 IN THE AIR = MORE PLANT GROWTH AND SPECIES PRESERVATION
You've got to be absolutely retarded in regards to Ecology or an energy shill to believe this nonsense in literal context. There is a limit and we have surpassed it.
>>53772621
So by how much must we reduce it?
>>53772709
Current estimates show we must drastically cut back and begin to reduce CO2 levels in the atmosphere by 2050 or 2060 in order to maintain a modicum of the current biodiversity on this planet. If not I hope you like bacterial slime and jellyfish riddling the ocean.
>>53772789
the problem is heat not this CO2 meme
even if you were to carbon trap all the CO2 in the world you 'd still have the same problem
there are worse greenhouse gases (and liquids) suspended in the athmosphere
>>53772789
>by how much should we reduce it?
>according to our estimates: drastically
Get fucked, asshole. If you could actually set goals and not a slippery slope of regulation, maybe we'd have a decent energy plan to stick to.
