http://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/c277985b-3edb-4f13-93f2-902bf81ea208
>Debate on an e-petition relating to making the production, sale and use of cannabis legal
>Westminster Hall
>Monday 12 October 2015 Meeting starts at 4.30pm
Is today the day the United Kingdom sets in motion the legalisation of the herbal jew?
>>53524562
I hope so, i want to make shekels off of dumb stoners
I used to be a lil stoner when I was 14-16 I used to think it was the coolest shit, now I fucking hate it. I hate cunting stoners, fucking piece of shit degenerate faggots.
nice i will grow and well it then.
Meh, dont like this a bit. I would make less money if this shit is legal.
>>53524562
Can't wait to see more of these around...
>>53524876
>Meh, dont like this a bit. I would make less money if this shit is legal.
Are you dealing? It's true that you'd get fucked by it if so.
>>53524789
It's a vice, and its use is certainly associated with some terrible people.
>>53524710
Said "dumb stoners" are all over Clear UK's Facebook page. It is amazing hilarity. So many self-proclaimed anticapitalists and generally leftie blowhards. I don't think they represent cannabis users at all, but because they're the loudest and most irritating, they're the people who get noticed.
If alcohol is legal, I see no reason why weed shouldnt be too.
>>53525035
These days mostly just growing for personal and close friend- use and only selling some if in dire need of money. Few years ago it was the other way around.
Smoking weed is real degeneracy. All of the toolbags currently ruining American culture promote smoking weed daily. I wish T Swizzle would come out as against that dumb shit
>>53525247
I'd like to think any legalisation model would include a modicum of plants permitted to grow at home.
>>53524562
>cant own a knife
>thinking the government will let you smoke weed or do anything without a permission slip from Big Brother
>>53525526
I fear that as well. Somehow, if and when it does finally become legalised, I don't foresee it being the market free-for-all that Colorado went with. It will probably be more tightly controlled, maybe even state monopoly.
>>53525442
That would be the best scenario
>>53525726
>state monopoly
This most likely
