http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/top-publisher-bans-mentions-of-pigs-or-pork-so-as-not-to-offend-muslims-or-jews-9976568.html
A publisher in the UK will no longer be publishing or referencing the word 'pig' or any derivatives eg 'sausage' or 'pork' in order to avoid offending "muslims and jews"
Seriously, just adopt sharia already.
>>40657027
you guys are really trying hard, we don't even have that here!
is it a contest with Sweden about who will be under sharia first ?
Doesn't the Qu'ran say not to eat pork somewhere, will they refuse to publish this because it references eating a pig as well?
>>40657123
Remember Britain, there is no God but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet.
>>40657244
SSHHH don't say his name! You trying to get us killed?
good job, eurozone, i see your renewed devotion to 'muh free speech, muh solidarity' has lasted about a day before you went back to sucking cocks and cowtowing to the muslims which the international zionist elites are flooding into your countries with.
EAT BACON
IF SOME JEW OR MUSLIM WHINES ABOUT IT, SPIT BACON ON THEM
SHOUT 'FUCK YEAH AMERICA' AT THE TOP OF YOUR LUNGS
TASTE THE FREEDUMB
>>40657165
we are now slowly entering a world where moving to Algeria will allow to live a better quality of life and respect to your natural rights than the UK
maximum kek.
>>40657027
>http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/top-publisher-bans-mentions-of-pigs-or-pork-so-as-not-to-offend-muslims-or-jews-9976568.html
The ENTIRE article is slating the letter.
These aren't rules, just some PC cunt in Oxford being a PC cunt.
>>40657027
>Italians will no longer say "PORCO DIO" because it contains the word "porco" (pig, pork), which may offend muslims
>wait a sec...
>>40657331
I really hope this is just their way of sending a message, a form of reductio ad absurdum.
