I found this in my computer's friend. Is he going insane?
>>37156895
He may be a schizo, OP. Be careful.
he's nuts
>>37156895
sounds plausible
In California we would call him a wingnut
Some people need visual aids when trying to explain something to themselves in an attempt to connect things that might not be so obviously connected.
It is useful but it is deductive reasoning (which is what this graph is) because it makes connections between things without justifiable information and detail.
tl;dr - no your friend is actually pretty smart but he might not be working in a smart fashion
>>37156895
>this chart
thats actually pretty fucking ridiculous. how much adderall was he on when he made it?
a concise explanation of what's going on in the world
except for the useful idiot part
>>37156895
It makes sense in a loose way. Obviously many dots need to be connected, but I think this model as it stands represents the approximate situation.
The main problem with this model is it's reductive view of reality. Not all degeneration began with the Frankfurt school.
>>37157132
You would need to write a 100 pages book to connect all these things with justifiable information and detail.
>>37157392
1000*
>>37157068
>>37157117
>>37157011
>>37157259
>Samefag pls go
Actually OP, this is what a lot of highly esteemed paleo conservatives and John Birch types have been saying for years.
This graph is about correct with some minor inacurracies.
>>37156895
>I found this in my computer's friend.
sounds like you got bigger problems there bud
>>37157392
the jump from Frankfurt to Social Sciences to Progressivism need to be explained better. but after that it seems pretty good
>>37156895
>one of the rare guys who knows the truth
>insane
everything there is verifiable
>Jew...
stopped reading there, sage
>>37156895
No. I urge you to do serious, sober research into what you found. You'll find that much of it is true.
>>37156895
That's a very good chart that does much to explain the current political situation in the west.
The more people who see it the better.
that's pretty sweet
now replace progressivism with capitalism, and forget about the social science/muh frankfurt school stuff
there, that is the truth
>>37156895
Your friend is correct, as an approximation at least.
I would like to know how much the Saudis and other Arab countries put into subversion, ad the USSR did.
>>37157632
fuck off kike
>>37157632
your loss
>>37156895
If your friend is insane for that chart, then the Army is absolutely off the rails. Pic related.
Tempted to post this shit to my kikebook since it's quite well thought out.
>>37156895
Nope. About as accurate as you can get, for a flow chart.
>>37157968
that is pure autism right there
>>37158008
Do it for Dio.
>WRRRRRRRRYYYYYYYYY!
>>37157968
Oh god what the fuck
>>37158008
remove the Jewish thing, people will just close their eyes and shout LALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU otherwise
>>37158008
Do it.
>>37158114
Juden pls
>>37158114
that's important though
>>37158179
yeah, but people can research the Frankfurt School later and come to the realization themselves
>>37158114
Yes, tell everyone it is the Illuminati, or the elites, or anybody else except the chosen ones.
Done, finish, final.
Did it for DIO.
>Implying anyone will even look at it.
>Implying anyone will even say anything.
I've posted so much redpill shit on my kikebook and it seems to just fall into the horde of shitty updates.
>>37158114
Fuck you kike.
>>37158281
hurr durr it's da jooooos
pol sounds like a broken record, as usual
>Par for the course for /pol/
>B-but its not crazy when I do it!
>>37158474
So you're versed in /pol/'s teaching. Can you show me how it's NOT the jews?
>>37158474
>/pol/ shows how Jews own an absurd amount of media.
>OY VEY! G-D YOU GOYIM ARE LIKE A BROWKEN RECOWRD!
>>37158624
that chart is the fakest shit
>>37158680
chaim pls
>>37158710
Where are the source? What are your sources?
Oh let me guess
1) Stormfront
2) Charles Murray
3) J. P. Rushton
4) Republican Party
5) Heritage Foundation
6) NRA....
What do I win?
>>37158281
It's zionism, which does have it's roots in Talmudic jews, but not all zionist are necessarily jews, and not all jews are zionists.
Except for the Jews and KGB part, it pretty much describes the liberal conspiracy perfectly.
>>37158802
Go on, explain what part is wrong.
>>37156895
look pretty accurate till the bottom right side and the conclusion
also that chart is just one peice of a larger system
>>37158833
Pretty much this.
Here is the version without the dubious claims.
>>37158802
>Where are the source? What are your sources?
Oh, so are you trying to tell us that all the CEOs and presidents and owners are NOT the actual CEOs and presidents and owners?
>>37157392
>>37157446
or the hundreds of books and testimony already in existence
>>37158833
the liberal conspiracy is the jews. exactly whom do you think began the liberal/progressive movement?
>>37158965
it feels like it's missing something...
>>37158927
>>37158966
>>37158966
Most of them are not Jewish, there's no proof whatsoever
>>37158833
look up Yuri Bezmenov
>>37159025
I refuse to blame an ethnicity without proof just because Hitler said so
>>37156895
Your friend is a smart man. The Soviets is to blame for the declining culture of America. They want us to be degenerates so we may forgo our hegemony.
Muh J00s? More like Muh Soviets!
>>37159281
it is a fact that those involved in the Frankfurt School were predominantly jews
>>37159291
jidf not even trying anymore
>>37159316
the importance of FS is blown out of proportions, they just wrote a bunch of sissy books that nobody read
>>37159350
RIDF please
>>37158965
But the Soviet part is important. The "J00s did this" is a Soviet trick to get people off the right path of the truth and to get others to think all of this is crazy. Sneaky.
>>37159362
Their work directly contributed to women's studies, "african american" studies, etc. You can see it all over the place.
>>37159362
they were very well connected and are still taken seriously as academics. Their background and funding is rarely brought up when they are discussed.
Depending how much area of that chart you believe, that will be your ideology.
Nat-Socs believe the Jewish part and the international banks and media part only.
Libertarians believe the part about increasing government spending only.
Mainstream Republicans believe some dangers of progressivism.
Some old Republicans believe the Russian part.
>>37159362
To add to this >>37159464
You are also engaging in a Frankfurt School tactic called critical theory, which is to criticize but offer no proof of counter claims.
>>37159503
(as long as you are a right winger)
Racists focus on the taboo research part and the immigration part.
>>37159414
they had their own problems in this regard. Ever wonder why Stalin bumped off so many jews? Who were the Stalinists and who the Trotskyists back in America?
>>37157478
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Social_Research
"In 1933, after the rise of Hitler, the Institute left Germany for Geneva and then in 1934 moved to New York City. In New York it became affiliated with Columbia University, and its journal Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung was renamed Studies in Philosophy and Social Science. It was there that much of the important work of the Frankfurt School thinkers began to emerge, and the Institute's residence in New York was likely partly accountable for its work's favorable reception in American and English academia."
>>37159503
And if I'm not a nazi, libertarian or republican?
>>37158281
Tell them it's Communism.
And actually explain how, instead of being a buzzword-spouting chucklefuck Republican.
Here is a hypothesis that needs researched. Is there is a chance that the magnitude of the 6 gorrillion shoah is being overplayed? The rounding up the of the Jews did happen without a doubt but did six million Jews really die? Who would make up such a thing? The Zionists? Sounds like they would on the surface, but who would have the capability to trick the world and why? You guessed right, comrade. The Soviets fabricated the six million shoah to hide atrocities committed in Eastern Europe.
>>37158833
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4
Do you know nothing about the KGB ideological subversion you idiot?
It was the main focus of the KGB.
>>37159591
Are you even a right winger? I don't know, how much of the chart do you believe?
>>37159670
I would consider myself a conservative, but that's about as far as I'm willing to label myself. And the chart looks pretty spot on to me.
>>37159670
>how much of the chart do you believe?
Zero. It's a bunch of schizophrenic crap.
>>37156895
Do you still consider him you're friend?
>>37159818
you are friend*
>>37158833
except thanks to Yuri Bezmenov, a KGB defector, we know that the KGB actively supported leftist movements and conducted subversion efforts on a massive scale.
What a fucking load of crap crap and more crap.
>muh jews
>muh russians
Wow, this is some schizo material.
>muh frankfurt school
HAHAHA, OH WOW!
>muh monolithic traditions
Wow, wow, they didn't die because they were attacked. They died because they relied on oppressing fucking everyone except white males, you fucking ignoramus. People got tired of being oppressed.
>>37159949
Are you even trying, SJW?
into the folder of lunatic conspiracy rambling it goes
>>37159949
Not sure if bait or just another left-leaning dude who thought that he'd come here to debate with /pol/.
Here's a hint: do better than just call it names, actually tell us why anything is wrong. If it's so dumb, it can't be hard, right?
>>37160041
>muh monolithic traditions
Wow, wow, they didn't die because they were attacked. They died because they relied on oppressing fucking everyone except white males, you fucking ignoramus. People got tired of being oppressed.
>>37160129
hmmm, a bot? guess i need to search the archives. i hate them, but in times like these, they come in handy.
>>37159949
nice shitposting, but you need to do some research to improve it
>>37160168
I was repeating the argument you ignored, fucktard.
>>37157314
>except for the useful idiot part
He's quoting Yuri Bezmenov.
>>37160221
i didn't ignore anything because i wasn't the one who you were responding to.
also, people were tired of being oppressed long before the 20th century. don't be a retard.
>>37160221
care to expand on the difference, and what you mean?
>>37156895
I don't see a problem, OP.
>>37160325
Those guys look like they are part of the mob. Evil damned eyes
>>37159503
>Some old Republicans believe the Russian part.
And some young whipper snappers.
Your daily reminder the Soviet Union never fell within the leadership and their objectives. Once a KGB always a KGB.
The McIlhany Report: The Perestroika Deception (Part 1) [27:39]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fscr8qwIUlE
The McIlhany Report: The Perestroika Deception (Part 2) [28:21]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byKW5X9yMNo
>William H. McIlhany interviews Christopher Story, an investigative journalist and editor of the journal Soviet Analyst. This two-part discussion focuses on the false demise of Communism in the former Soviet Union and the ongoing strategic merger of Russia and the United States to form a "new world order" (i.e. socialist world government) under the United Nations. Originally broadcasted in 1995.
The McIlhany Report: Perestroika Deception 2003 (Part 1) [28:14]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNVYU94S-Vc
The McIlhany Report: Soviet Terror Network & Iraq (Part 2) [30:27]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFsipXBp_cc
>William H. McIlhany interviews Christopher Story, an investigative journalist and editor of the journal Soviet Analyst. This is a follow up interview to their 1995 discussion on the false demise of Communism in the former Soviet Union. In this program they discuss several topics such as the continued perestroika deception, Russia's continued support of international terrorism, and the recent Iraq war. Originally broadcasted in July 2003.
>>37156895
naw
What's your friend's name OP? And where are you from?
The chart is somewhat reasonable
the first few posts are samefags and/or jews
>>37157314
>except for the useful idiot part
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLqHv0xgOlc
>>37160464
Kevin. From Arkansas.
Why??
>>37160577
Why are you doxing yourself, mate?
>>37156895
>>37157011
OP's "friend" doesn't exist. OP created that chart from being on /pol/ and he's schizo so he doesn't realize his friend is a figment of his imagination.
>>37160577
Good good. My grandfather was from Arkansas too. And, what town or city? Little Rock perhaps?
>>37160674
what the fuck
>>37160792
Hehe, just a little chat. Relax pal. Or are you some kind of queer? I hooley hope not...
Are the parents of OP in town?
>>37160792
>shut it down
>>37160495
If this guy exposed this whole thing, why was nothing done to reverse the damage?
>>37156895
this is pretty good actually
>>37160309
>Implying he will.
Do you really think a leftist has any facts to back that up?
He's desperate.
>>37161094
I was pretty clear already.
A system does not fall because it is criticized.
A system falls because people get fed up.
>>37161124
>He still doesn't provide facts.
Come on Chaim.
>>37160325
what is the end game though? There is already a ruling elite who can do a they please? What would subverting the west change?
>>37161237
The end game is to create what a lot of people here have been saying from the start: a police state, for your own protection of course.
Everything the soviets did was an effort to oppose freedom, and even after their collapse, it's working great.
>>37161192
Because OP's chart provides facts? HAHAHA
>>37161679
>I am both blind and retarded
OPs image was clearly created by a troll.
Marriage causes high divorce rates?
>not sure if intentionally funny
>or just 0/10 trolling
Or chastity causing parenthood.
>I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Incidentally, if you REALLY want to know what causes broken families, it's welfare. The only way to qualify for welfare is to be a single parent. This is why broken families are so common in the black community. It's seen as easy money. Poor married couples do not quality for welfare so they stay unmarried and dad usually skips out.
>>37162209
Read it again.
Progressivism ATTACKS traditions SUCH AS religion/family AS IN marriage CAUSING high divorce rates
>>37162356
It makes more sense with commas between the word family and AS and marriage and CAUSING. To put simply,"Progressivism ATTACKS marriage, CAUSING high divorce rates".
>>37162503
Eh, I was just trying to do it how its shown on the chart, to help clarify the reasoning its putting out
>>37156895
You can't really argue with his logic.
>>37160611
dubs confirm, OP be crazy
>>37157117
In California you call a glass of HIV positive cum a "refreshing drink."
>>37156895
Not only is your friend not nuts but he provides a pretty useful chart to show how leftist political subversion has trickled down to the present day to create the political reality we now live in.
Solid chart, saved for future use. You friend is a boss.
>>37156895
Yeah, he is in need of help.
>>37156895
No now go back to your "politically correct" society that doesn't question morons.
>>37156895
The fuck, how would critical theory help relativism? Critical theory is perfectly reasonable.
And don't cite Feyerabend, everyone hates that fucktard, even Popper did.
Also, empiricism a shit.
>>37156895
nah, he's just organizing his ideas, he probably has a couple more related to this one
>>37166379
Whiteness as oppression is ridiculous, so is the vast amounts of feminist ideology based in critical theories of oppression.
>>37156895
>yfw Progressivism was founded in the 1880s, started mostly by Roosevelt in the 1900s
That's only the tip of the iceberg on why that infograph is dead wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism#Use_by_21st_century_US_conservatives
