Offensive Statistics Thread
Also good infographics
>>35127422
The truth isn't offensive.
Women who have had a certain amount of lovers cannot pairbond.
>>35127422
how the fuck is that offensive?
>>35127422
How is that offensive?
Only a butthurt SJW whore would be offended, but they get offended from a sultry glance.
>>35127574
>white reproduction rates
LOL
>>35128035
The truth offends lefty
>>35128121
Yep, 'muh dissapearing race' is mostly liberal whtes who don't have kids. I'm happy as whites become smaller and more conservative
Reminder that the truth can be hate speech, goyim.
(This opinion was written by Justice Rothstein.)
>>35128257
I can do that too
>>35128346
Why is Canada such a nanny state?
>>35128736
This laws will soon apply to the entire world goy. You can't stop us because the very system of economics you worship enables us to subvert and control everything.
>>35127422
>meet girl who's fucked 20 guys before marrying her
>not sure if you should encourage her to fuck one more to increase stability odds at expense of STD odds
>>35127422
>>35128751
Does anyone else notice the constructive wave pattern, and how this oscillation will continue to become more and more extreme?
>>35128949
>muh vajina shows how clean ah am foh the lawd
>being this '50s
White least likely to be serial killers vs blacks who are the most. But because people cant in2 ratios and shit, white straight men are the typical profile for a serial killers because muh raw numbers unadjusted for population faggotry
>>35128780
Not my form of economics. Politicians aren't allowed to interfere with my form of economics.
>>35128853
>>35128035
it pretty much makes every woman look like shit.
and whatever offends women is the only thing that matters, naturally.
>>35129018
Derp
>>35128853
The reason it jumps back up is because at that point, most couples are swingers anyways.
>>35129050
dif between fig 9 and 10?
>>35129012
Best Korea can take our used up whores. We don't want them.
>>35129128
The crimes they're showing are different.
Top has robbery, murder, ect.
Bottom has drugs, ect.
Just different crimes.
>>35129050
Good pic but needs sauce.
>>35129002
>>35129014
Because when whites do mass murders, it's to make a clear statement and we kill multiple people in brutal ways to get our message across. Hence the media portrayal of whites as serial killers.
>>35129066
m pretty sure most species has consent
otherwise what are mating dances and shit for
>>35129050
holy fuck, why do pacific islanders steal so many cars? You'd think they'd be stealing boats or some shit.
>>35129183
Long version with even more facts
>>35129301
See:
Dolphins
Elephants
so on
very smart species that participate frequently in rape
Ducks while having a mating dance, frequently participate in rape
>>35129467
you did not address my point
>>35129535
Needs better source
That is vague and googling this gets nothing.
>>35129535
Any lib is going to take one look at that and simply decide the SATs are racist.
>>35128949
People don't really believe this, right?
>>35128958
It's a product of more recent data being more available.
>>35129050
This is amazing.
This infographic alone would be enough to cause a massive chimpout.
>>35129514
Absolutely they did, the point is that rape happens a lot, and your flimsy argument about mating dances is complete bullshit.
Take your ownage like a good little bitch.
>>35129864
What the fuck is this shit?
>>35129928
yeah....
no
you're doing the truth a disservice
>>35129961
>>35130008
Empirical evidence trumps your solipsism, you're completely ignoring the truth.
>>35129970
Basically debunking the myth that somehow indigenous/tribal cultures were somehow less violent than those horrible, awful white europeans.
>>35130247
so literally no other species on the planet has sexual consent?
>>35129012
yea dirty vaginas are really cool, the only reason to have a clean one is because your "stupid"
autism speaks
Man, I need to do one of these infographics on immigration and wealth inequality.
But I have a feeling all the desperate matlab shills would get their dicks knotted over mathematica graphs.
>>35130351
Not explicit consent in the modern day femi-fucktard sense, absolutely not.
Animals are literally too low functioning to have that level of consent, however they can rape, as that's a behavior endemic to primitive minds and species.
"consent" in the animal kingdom is an autonomic response to stimuli, which feminsts don't believe to be consent, and that's specifically what that infographic had sought out to mock.
So yeah, they don't. :^)
>>35130518
gotcha
>>35130447
Now just imagine if North Africans, Arabs, and Pakis/Bangladeshis/Indians weren't classified as White.
>>35129829
You're on /pol/.
99% percent of what people express or believe here is conjecture, misrepresented data, strawman intellectual fallacy or just plain nonsense taught to them by their angry drunk conservative parents.
This thread is a prime example.
>>35128853
Why not fuck her. Wear a rubber you will be fine
>>35130642
>>35130636
>99% percent of what people express or believe here is conjecture, misrepresented data
>99% percent
Check out this moron.
>>35130636
>muh amygdala
>statistics are wrong
Keep telling yourself that.
>>35130670
Just to play devil's advocate, couldn't there have been undocumented white on black rape?
>>35129301
you think a male animal l will just give up on having sex if the mating dance is ignored?
>>35130739
>>35130831
Nice, thought out response.
>>35130776
>Just to play devil's advocate, couldn't there have been undocumented white on black rape?
Sure, just like there could be a lot more undocumented black-on-white rape. In any case, your suggestion seems a little silly in light of the severity of the statistics, not to mention that white-on-black rape would be a cause celebre, and money in the bank for the victim.
Surely you remember the false accusations against the Duke lacrosse players.
>>35130636
Classic "you're using false facts" and then proceeding not to back it up your claim with facts.
>>35129050
don't let a pacific islander around your car holy shit
>>35130776
How much undocumented rape do you think there'd be?
But, to be fair, these numbers aren't true zeroes.
What happened is that the stats collected from all the counties and reporting areas were so low that they had to be rounded down to the nearest number, and that number was zero.
But even in a worse case scenario, do you think that the FBI or the cops were able to cover up 20-30,000 rapes from ever being reported to even make things even?
I mean, even if whites somehow did match the numbers, you still have to consider that whites are about 55% of the population, whereas blacks are only about 12%, so they'd still be wildly out of proportion.
But ultimately, this is pretty much saying that the amount of white on black rapes is so low that it's effectively zero.
>>35130642
>>35130670
See, according to statistics that can actually be referenced and linked to through a government tallying body, white people rape more than black people.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-43
Most of the time (and by that, I mean always) when you try to check any of those racist charts, you'll find out that they are bullshit or just plainly fabricated.
A mere reverse search will land you on Stormfront.
>>35129839
check out france keepin' it real.
>>35130972
You forgot a little detail. 12% of the population vs. 75% of the population.
>>35130776
Indeed there could have happened something like this and 100,000 rapes by blacks could've been false rape reports. It seems more likely that whites rape black women all the time but since society is trying to keep blacks down the cops naturally never file those reports since they're racist (which is the reason that black people go to jail more often than whites actually)
>>35130972
"White" people make up about 70% of the population of the U.S.
>>35130642
>>35130670
Where are you actually getting this from the source? I'm reading the documents and am unable to find a chart of victims and offenders cross referenced by race.
>>35130972
Not per capita: blacks make up 12% of the population, but commit 20% of rapes.
>>35131008
Not true. I've helped make several and usual they are decent and come from real sources. The problem is they don't show everything, but the volume of the amount of facts helps fix any quality problems they might have.
Mind you, several times people here have tried to falsify a graph only to get told they are retarded and can't look up information properly.
Some of the jew ones are pretty fucking terrible bullshit, I'll admit that.
>>35129535
But any black that makes that much or had a child is not going to be a nigger gang banger, they are gonna be just dark whites.
Ghetto blacks are the bad ones.
>>35130776
Yeah but they round to nearest whole number and whites did so few, the closest whole number was 0. Gov stats dont deal in fractions and shit.
>>35131157
>>35131131
Nope. They won't be ghetto, but his kids will.
In other words, the grandkids of a smart black will go back to the ghetto. That's race for you.
The grandkids of a dumb white will go to university.
>>35131189
Judging exclusively based on the two pictures lions that have to live around niggers are more belligerent.
Can we really blame them?
>>35131189
Not the guy who posted it, but it shows that even among apparently identical groups, there can be identifiable genetic differences. It points out that if we consider those two lions to be members of different sub-species, considering all races of humans as identical despite that fact that there ARE apparent differences is inconsistent and downright unreasonable.
>>35131291
eh, that guy could probably pass for an old white man with darker skin
>>35131351
>hernandez
nigga plz
>>35131320
>5'01
>>35131421
i meant aside from his name, obviously. the rest look like straight up wetbacks but if you squint that one looks like a white old grandpa pervert
>>35131372
>dindu nuffin rong
Lol.
>>35131520
Coming over from another board.
Just a legitimate question for all the 'black people are the worst criminals' peeps:
Do you honestly believe that poverty and socio-economic factors don't play a part in crime statistics? Do you think addressing these factors would or would not address the problem of crimes committed better than simply saying 'fuck black people'?
Give that historically, African-Americans have been fundamentally unable to access capital and financial assets in any meaningful way until very recently (objective fact) due to the United State's racial history - is it not worth taking a more pragmatic approach to reduce poverty and thus crime?
Genuinely curious as to how the average /pol/itician's mind works.
>>35131543
>>35131462
are you fucking kidding?
I'm mexican and that guy is the most mexican looking guy posted so far
>>35131543
>>35131520
>Bemusement park
>>35131576
I'm of the opinion that they could change. their culture is just such absolute garbage that they don't want to.
they could test well, if given the correct resources.
but that's a could, not a will.
"MAN, THIS TEST IS BU-SHIT. I DUN GIV A FUG, MANE. STOOPID ASS CLASS. SHEET."
not a lack of capability, a lack of actually giving a shit.
>>35131576
If they would've listened to Booker T. Washington, it would've been fine.
>>35131576
>The single best predictor of the violent crime levels in an area is the percent of Black or Hispanics, even more than income or education. The correlation between race and crime is 0.81, which is statistically "very strong"; the correlation between poverty and crime is only 0.36, which is statistically "weak."
<See pic.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.pdf
Liberals often try to blame Black violence on poverty. The Census data, however, disproves that hypothesis.
How? In 1995, among the American poor, there were 16.3 million Whites (real ones), 10.0 million Blacks, 8.6 million “Hispanics,” and 1.4 million Asians. Blacks comprised about 27.6% of the American poor.
Those poverty numbers can be verified at:
http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/nation/intfile3-1.txt
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/pov95/povest1.html [archive]
During that year, Blacks committed about 54% of all US murders. Remember that the FBI, from whom the murder information comes, counts “Hispanics” as “Whites,” making the total number of poor persons eligible to be committing murders as “Whites” about 24.8 million. These “Whites” comprised 68.5% of the American poor, but committed – at most – only 46% of 1995 US murders, if we make the doubtful assumption that Asians and Amerindians committed none. The evidence argues against the liberal hypothesis that poverty causes crime.
>>35131576
This >>35131633. I'm sure they MIGHT be able to change, but they simply refuse. It
's much easier to blame whitey than to change.
>>35131579
>>35131738
>>35131702
Rape is an economic crime if liberals are willing to admit that women are merchandise or “goods”, and that men are compelled to take them because they’re impoverished, and not criminal scum.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/soo.pdf [archived] (See page 10)
The racial distribution of arrestees for rape is similar to the racial distribution for all violent UCR arrests ? 56% of arrestees for rape in 1995 were white, 42% were black, and 2% were of other races.
The more recent rape statistics taken in May 2011 are even more staggering:
The population of all races – approx. 275,617,000
White 226,563,000 Black 35,392,000
226,563,000/275,617,000 = 82.2% of Whites in America 35,392,000/275,617,000 = 12.8% of Blacks in America
Blacks commit 19,232 rapes on white women per year, while white-on-black rape is literally non-existent.
source: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf pg 55. 16.4% of 117,640 = 19,293
>>35131757
>>35131732
The same is true for tumblrinas. Hell, every victim of "white oppression". They're basically the same as rednecks. You know the type. smokes pot all day, lives in a filthy trailer. they don't change because it's "the system".
>>35131576
Wow, what a great argument. No one has made that one before!
see
>>35129788
Every single first world country shows blacks committing significantly more crime than Whites. There is not a single 1st world country where black crime rate falls within any Standard Error measurement, let alone two times that SE.
The reason for these facts is to show that the problems within the black community are not due to racism but an inherit biological difference between the races.
So what do these stats imply? That wasting resources to fight "intolerance and racism" would not help black people, at least significantly. If black people had, on average, higher crime rates, than it would show that there is little racism in the judicial system.
Then if racism is not a factor, then the only way to get blacks to be equal in terms of income and such, was to literally give them money just to offset their biological factors. This sounds stupid and even most liberals wouldn't like this plan.
>>35131776
>>35129335
underrated
>>35131576
>This high rate of Black violence is consistent throughout the world, even in countries without the American history of Black slavery such as Great Britain, France, and Canada. Blacks are 2% of the British population yet 1/3 of all shooting victims: "gun crime is not unique to the black community, but… the black community is over-represented to a frightening degree."
http://web.archive.org/web/20090401214045/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/the-truth-about-black-on-black-crime-444774.html
>In New York City, "blacks committed 66 percent of all violent crimes in the first half of 2009 (though they were only 55 percent of all stops and only 23 percent of the city's population). Blacks committed 80 percent of all shootings in the first half of 2009. Together, blacks and Hispanics committed 98 percent of all shootings.
>Blacks committed nearly 70 percent of all robberies. Whites, by contrast, committed 5 percent of all violent crimes in the first half of 2009, though they are 35 percent of the city's population (and were 10 percent of all stops). They committed 1.8 percent of all shootings and less than 5 percent of all robberies. The face of violent crime in New York, in other words, like in every other large American city, is almost exclusively black and brown. Any given violent crime is 13 times more likely to be committed by a black than by a white perpetrator."
http://www.city-journal.org/2010/eon0514hm.html
>>35131800
http://youtu.be/QqhfKPM09F4
>>35131576
Black behavior is the same in even the most egalitarian countries with no history of slavery.
Black areas in, say, the U.S., look much like Africa.
Areas of Africa which were not colonized tend to be the POOREST, while blacks in areas that were colonized are much better off.
Socioeconomics HAVE been addressed in this thread.
Blacks have markedly lower IQ then Whites, and the IQ gap has not budged an inch despite MASSIVE gains for blacks in terms of income and nutrition and access to education, medicine, and so on.
Different human groups have different attributes due to the environments in which they developed.
>>35131849
>>35131800
Any more of these? There are plenty cases to make more of these
>>35129002
is that an actual ben garrison? I just don't know anymore
>>35129535
The senior developer at my company is black. He has a son and a daughter, but he doesn't talk about them very much. Turns out that he fits the stereotype hard: his son is in prison and his daughter got pregnant at 14.
Also, he's a shit coder, but I'm suspecting our company is hanging on to him because he's black, and therefore fills our diversity quota out real nicely.
>>35131936
If there are, I haven't been able to find them. Their site is rather broken atm.
Honestly if you are posting shit without sources, fucking kill yourself. Even if they are true. This isnt a fucking circle jerk echo chamber faggotry party.
I want to sue this to redpill people who will ignore unless there are sources.
POST THEM
>>35131576
>Do you honestly believe that poverty and socio-economic factors don't play a part in crime statistics?
Obviously.
Even controlling for these things, there are racial differences in crime rates.
Anyway, poverty doesn't cause significant differences in homicide rates. Poor choices cause both, although SES can perpetuate maladaptive cultural routines.
>>35131968
What is the website
>>35131982
>I want to sue
Is that you shekelstein?
>>35131924
this would be cool if there was a source list at the bottom. without that this is useless.
>>35131576
It can't be just poverty, as discussed elsewhere.
The remainder is either culture or race. If the former, there should be pressure to change, and blaming poverty actually removes the pressure.
If the latter, there's nothing anyone can do about it, so it is better to assume it is culture.
>>35131982
Did you already make a post butthurt samefag
>>35130636
>>35132021
http://unamusementpark.com/
>>35131924
>>35131982
There are literally sources in most of the material and you can find it yourself, many have posted sources.
>The MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) is used to measure psychopathology and Blacks and American Indians have the highest psychopathic scores of any racial/ethnic group in America.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1151600
http://books.google.com/books?id=Wyk09irh2acC
>Statistics show that just like Blacks, Amerindians also have very high crime rates, consistent with their high MMPI scores.
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/aic.pdf
Also not a stat but pic related
>Horrific White criminals generally have severe mental problems, yet most Blacks who commit such crimes are considered ordinary and even sometimes converge with friends in the spur of the moment to join with them.
http://www.vdare.com/francis/riot.htm
>>35131982
Just about all these pics have sources in them turd.
I'm sorry you're inconvenienced by the fact you might have to open the image and then type the source into the address bar of your web browser.
/pol/ 1
Brainwashed liberal 0
The peaceable Negro
>Although some argue that the criminal system is biased against Blacks, this does not seem the case. When controlled for criminal background, Black felons actually have a 2% lower likelihood of going to prison compared to White felons, and the sentencing length of felony defendants is only 6% higher than Whites.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.pdf
>>35132207
>>35132230
>>35129161
Okay so I have a question: If these camps weren't built to gas people then why were they built? Did the Nazi party plan on just keeping gypsies, jews, and other people in the camps indefinitely? What was their endgame?
>>35130776
Are you kidding? Think of the MASSIVE chimpout that would occur.
>>35132114
tl;dr please
What have african empires ever accomplished?
This always offends a bunch of people here
Jews are literally insane, probably due to all their sickfuck inbreeding
www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/8123-insanity
http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/jews/schizo.htm
http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/18638/mental-illness-is-a-jewish-issue-that-we-must-address/
They also have six trillion genetic diseases unique only to kikes because the yids are so inbred and absolutely disgusting
The 'Uniqueness' of Ashkenazi Jewish Ancestry is Important for Health
http://spittoon.23andme.com/ancestry-2/the-uniqueness-of-ashkenazi-jewish-ancestry-is-important-for-health/
Medical genetics of Jews
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_genetics_of_Jews
The Biology of the Jewish Problem
http://www.heretical.com/miscella/jewbiol.html
>>35132172
God how can a black guy be so based
>>35132303
Honestly, if you can't bother to read that you're not worth the trouble and I don't want you on my side.
>>35130636
>Misrepresented data
Yep thats exactly what it is just keep the denial up everything here is a lie... Everything /pol/ is always wrong.... Your always right lefty.
>>35130776
>wouldn't there have been undocumented white on black rape?
Sure, also think about how much undocumented women get raped by niggers there was an /adv/ thread from a woman awhile back who got raped by a nigger and never reported leaving him to continue raping.
It's double stigmata for a white girl to get raped by a negro.
>>35132275
>If these camps weren't built to gas people then why were they built?
The same reason the American concentration camps were built. To keep a potentially dangerous population of people out of the public.
>Did the Nazi party plan on just keeping gypsies, jews, and other people in the camps indefinitely?
They would've been deported after the war.
>What was their endgame?
An Aryan Germany.
>>35130776
>couldn't there have been undocumented white on black rape?
Yes. But if it's undocumented it doesn't matter in the documentation as the documenters don't know about it.
>>35132321
> data that supports your side are all bad
> data that supports my side is right
*rolls eyes*
>>35132321
>faulty
>imprecise
>economics
pick three
go back to reddit
When will colorofcrime.com fucking update their shit?
I love their facts but its from 2005. Its almost a decade old. It was like a silver bullet for the liberal left back between 2005 to 2010 but now not so much. They say its old and blah blah get better newer shit.
I hate it.
>>35132383
>>35132410
Well, we can see a few people who have no idea what 1/se means.
It's okay, you don't need to pretend you've gone to college here.
>>35132275
It's in the fucking name.
Concentration camps, nigger.
America had them too and put people into concentration camps for the same reason.
Fucking this
The Jewish Declaration of War on National Socialist Germany:
http://web.archive.org/web/20130115044459/http://jewsagainstzionism.com/zionism/jewishwar.cfm
The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
Read Pic related
>>35132321
All the college bound kids will love it.
Meanwhile, actual poor people...
To be fair, Minimum wage effects are exaggerated.
>>35132423
2005 was the last year you could reliably get race on race statistics from the federal government. As I understand it, they don't release that info anymore (possibly because it shows exactly what the color of crime shows).
But hey, give them a shitton of money and I'm sure they could come up with a new version.
>>35129788
>Race a larger factor than muh socioeconomic satus
>>35132474
>Mixing two datasets
>No source for either
Poor form.
>>35131757
I want to believe but I require more
>>35132441
Eh, that's pretty weak. An elasticity of -1 would mean there's no net effect on aggregate wages, and the horizontal scale is therefore enormous. At the same time, this doesn't even slightly address the issues of allocative efficiency (people with higher reservation wages are now competing for these jobs), changes in hours or price changes.
Overall, my read on minimum wage is that it is a tempest in a teapot. Most studies find no effect because most minimum wage changes are really fucking small and actually have no effect, positive or negative.
>>35131068
What is that font
>>35132565
>>35132650
>>35132666
>some pics have no sources
What a disappointment.
>>35132619
I bet my picture is going to offend more people than yours.
>>35132726
Thanks for the idea...
>>35132806
>>35132538
What are you talking about?
It is from a Mercatus study.
http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/unintended-consequences-raising-minimum-wage.pdf
I think the Nate Silver guy's website also had something on this.
There are not two distinct data sets, it's just a data set from no highschool diploma was not added until 1985, if I remember correctly.
This uses relative minimum wage. A much better tool than nominal minimum wage studies.
It is common sense actually. It follows perfectly with economic theory.
Jobs are forced to pay for better employees, especially because a lot of service jobs aren't replaceable. On the other side, college kids are incentive to get jobs because of better pay.
The idea that these minimum wage jobs would not go disproportionately to college kids is not founded on any sound economic theory. The increased demand rhetoric makes no sense.
>>35132726
This doesnt debunk anything, it still shows that each women who is a big name in the feminist game is a jew.
>>35132830
>>35132859
>>35132830
>>35132859
Fallacy fallacy
>>35127422
test
>>35127993
Thank you for this, I will bring this up anytime anyone mentions how evil white people killed off trillions of natives.
>>35132321
>All these studies that disagree with me are wrong
>>35132965
>>35133009
Look, another person who doesn't know how to read the graph.
Please learn the most basic terms of statistics before you act smug, you look ridiculous.
>>35132458
Provide me a source on that Polish ethnic cleaning and I'll believe this.
inb4 look it up yourself. I'm high as an eagle and I already did a fuckton of my own research into the American/British propaganda during WWII and Holocaust revisionism. Just do this one for me.
>>35133043
>Study says 'all these studies that disagree with me may as well be rape'
>It doesn't say that shitlord!
k
>>35133154
Hey, it's not my fault you don't know what 1/Se means.
>>35132441
When will you answer >>35132570 or you dun goofed?
>>35133200
And thus we end up back here; >>35132570
>>35130972
Ouch there goes your credibility
>>35133139
A little bit of looking came up with this.
Hope it helps.
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7525
>>35133154
wtf are you on about
>>35133043
>>35132321
the problem with using your meta study is that it is time line bias.
The studies with the smallest standard error will be the
1) most modern.
2) national wide studies.
That study has been critiqued many times for this because
1) Most modern minimum wage increases are small in comparison to the past
2) Most national MW hikes are also small in comparison to local laws, which also supplant any effect a national mw might have.
32 states already have higher MWs-
http://www.ncsl.org/research/labor-and-employment/state-minimum-wage-chart.aspx
So you understand why this chart isn't referenced a lot in academic circles, but is spread widely around common folk despite that.
>>35133440
>>35133481
>>35133139
Here's some more info on it
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/polish_atrocities.htm
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=1960
Rather difficult figuring out the correct search string that will bring this evidence up but not thousands of links about "how the evil nazi's attacked the poor, innocent Pols and thus starting the holocaust and world war 2."
>>35133529
http://www.paulcooijmans.com/intelligence/iq_ranges.html
>>35133379
correct that, 23 states have higher mw
>>35133552
>>35133613
>>35131894
>IQ
Sorry but the IQ tests are biased towards whites and asians. If the IQ tests are objective, then there won't be a gap. Prove me wrong.
>>35133314
Hmmmm a bit sketchy, but it seems like there is at least a lot of controversy. I'll just have to look into it more myself.
>>35130642
not true. My black gf has rape fantasies so i rape her all the tiime
>>35133694
Check out the other two links in this post
>>35133541
Especially the first one because it offers a free book on the subject.
>>35133690
>If the IQ tests are objective, then there won't be a gap. Prove me wrong.
Races are different.
>>35132570
>>35133240
>>35133264
Okay, I will address this since you guys have already demonstrated your lack of knowledge in the area.
> An elasticity of -1 would mean there's no net effect on aggregate wages
Not in this context, this elasticity number has it multiplied by 100 for representative effect, (IE, to make it easier for a layman to understand. Clearly it didn't help).
>At the same time, this doesn't even slightly address the issues of allocative efficiency (people with higher reservation wages are now competing for these jobs), changes in hours or price changes.
This is the point of course though. The effect of these various factors is what real economists debate about. Only people who have no idea what they are talking about go "MUH UNEMPLOYMENT! MUH ECON 101 SUPPLY/DEMAND!"
>Most studies find no effect because most minimum wage changes are really fucking small and actually have no effect, positive or negative.
Again, exactly the point. No one contends that raising minimum wage to $50 an hour causes problems. That's why no one raises minimum wage to $50 an hour. There is no reason to expect any effect from a modest increase, because other factors control for it. Some companies raise prices, some companies eat the cost, and make more money from increased volume since they didn't raise prices.
There is no debate among real economists on if minimum wage causes unemployment. The answer is overwhelmingly no. The debate is on WHY there is no effect. The only people who say there is an effect are either non-economists, or people trying to get on television.
>>35133314
>>35133694
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident
According to Wikipedia the whole thing was a false flag attack. This interesting...especially seeing the wikipedia article on Auschwitz.
>>35133695
>>35133690
>Prove me wrong.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
You said that the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove.
>>35133255
ahahah fuck this is great
>>35133783
>>35133758
Doesn't mean IQ tests will give different results.
>>35133782
Don't forget, wikipedia is subject to political correctness (can't get any more politically correct than supporting the Nazi's)
and....
Wikipedia Editing Courses Launched by Zionist Groups
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/18/wikipedia-editing-zionist-groups
>>35133811
>>35133822
It does, as races are different.
>>35133797
Well where's your evidence that IQ tests are not biased? All the studies that you are using to show the gap are done to show the IQ test isn't objective. They are not conducted to show one race is less intelligent than another.
>>35133255
>>35133857
>no sources
dropped
I feel verklempt posting this
:^)
>>35133857
where's JFK then? he's more Irish then any of these people
>>35133857
brilliant
died when I saw the mystery of the druids
>>35133872
Races are different doesn't imply there is a difference in IQ. There are many things are a common across all races, what make you think IQ is not one of them?
>>35133874
Biased in what way? How can it be biased towards Whites if they're exactly the same as Blacks?
Socio-economic status perhaps? Scroll up, that's already been debunked in a few images. The poorest Whites outperform all but the absolute richest Blacks.
>>35133874
Five seconds on google.
http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ139349
