[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Denise Jolly is a big fat Liar
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 117
Thread images: 22
File: 2014-05-22-DeniseandMadonna.jpg (746 KB, 1451x1024) Image search: [Google]
2014-05-22-DeniseandMadonna.jpg
746 KB, 1451x1024
Pic related

So Denise Jolly does this body acceptance campaign you probably haven't missed. She caps it off with a supposed full nude shot in broad daylight on a public street.

Problem is the location doesn't exist... the background is shooped, the road she's standing on is shooped, even the handbag was ripped from the Madonna pic.

The spot:

www.google.com/maps/@40.704269,-73.982227,3a,30y,283.95h,85.52t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1seQM6RL7WmkRxse2jlc4f6w!2e0
It's so heavily edited that you have to question if she actually went through with it like she claims

It wouldn't care if the photo was a total fabrication in order to make an artistic statement, but she's been doing TV interviews, wrote an article in the Huffington post about the brave moment and so on.

What do you think?
Shameless Photography indeed.
Do you think we should call for the original shot?
>>
>>30815533
>Denise Jolly
who?
>>
>>30815695
yes, her... duh!
Maybe the Internet can help you figure it out.
I didn't know either until she started popping up all over the web and tv this week because of that picture.
>>
is very clear it is shooped, if you notice, the light sourse of her body shines differently than the entire background, and also it looks like it comes from different directions. Also the lack of her shadow.
>>
File: i krame.jpg (15 KB, 311x408) Image search: [Google]
i krame.jpg
15 KB, 311x408
>TFW fat fetish and American too
>>
>>30815934
Kill yourself, stat.
>>
Yeah, no doubt it's shooped. I not asking if it is.

But did she stand out SOMEWHERE on a public street and get shooped in, or was in private and totally fake and her story just as fabricated?
>>
File: 1376425204824.gif (30 KB, 125x125) Image search: [Google]
1376425204824.gif
30 KB, 125x125
>fatties refused to expend the effort to actually go outside
>>
This was discussed yesterday, the fact that there are no shadows gives it away. Just another spineless feminist who thinks their opinion matters, fat people are beautiful, and that they are more oppressed than any other women anywhere on the planet.
>>
>>30815533
Can someone shoop out her head, perhaps even lowering the hair, so it looks like some weird assed monster that has a giant face where its torso is?

I would be ever so greatful.
>>
>>30816128
No shadows from her fat bulbous body that is. One even said that her body had such an effect on gravity that it would bend light, this leaving no shadows. Also the purse is an orbiting moon
>>
>>30816128
I KNOW it's shooped, that is clear.


What I want to do is call her out on not even being nude in public.

Those things are not mutually exclusive.
>>
>>30815904
>lack of shadow

you fail to understand the size of her shadow
>>
>>30816267
>muh no shadows

learn2flatlight
>>
File: JohnSt.png (1 MB, 1360x746) Image search: [Google]
JohnSt.png
1 MB, 1360x746
This is the location of the background to give you an idea of the level of shooping.
>>
>>30815533
Who is the hottie in the original?
>>
File: 1395635164308.jpg (69 KB, 500x281) Image search: [Google]
1395635164308.jpg
69 KB, 500x281
>>30816343
You know, I'm starting to think it's shopped too man.
>>
>>30816267
Well, where was it supposedly taken? Call her out on the shear number of effects, there is nothing brave about editing a picture of yourself for 24 hours straight even if it was taken outside.
>>
>>30816348
You seriously need to read better...
IT"S FUCKING MADONNA
and you're 12
>>
jesus christ, just look at how much of that road she's taking up
she's gotta be at least 15 feet tall in that picture
>>
File: 1334552952807.jpg (23 KB, 196x240) Image search: [Google]
1334552952807.jpg
23 KB, 196x240
>>30816142
This. I saw the torso as a face too.
>>
>>30816343
It's like she added in random buildings and the bridge, put a shit car in the background and edited down so much that the street is unidentifiable. That so brave! I can edit a picture making it look like I jumped out of a plane with no parachute but that doesn't make me brave, nor does it qualify me to brag about it to the news
>>
>>30816570
The background is the google maps location I gave, but mirror imaged.

The road surface is ripped from the Madonna original, as is the purse. Anyway...

I REALLY WANT TO KNOW IF THE FATTY REALLY STOOD IN PUBLIC NUDE!

capcha: controversy oarnati
>>
File: fixed.jpg (207 KB, 684x1023) Image search: [Google]
fixed.jpg
207 KB, 684x1023
>>30815533
fixed it for you OP
>>
>>30815976
no u
>>
>>30816274
>you fail to understand the size of her shadow
hahahah!! fantastic.
>>
I REALLY WANT TO KNOW IF THE FATTY REALLY STOOD IN PUBLIC NUDE!

captcha: interested samoner
>>
File: hitchhiker.gif (408 KB, 500x462) Image search: [Google]
hitchhiker.gif
408 KB, 500x462
animooted
>>
File: 140193184645p8.jpg (761 KB, 1451x1024) Image search: [Google]
140193184645p8.jpg
761 KB, 1451x1024
>>30815533
here's a facebook friendly version
>>
>>30815533
this image makes me want to cut my dick off and crawl into a hole and never come out
>>
>>30816756
You could try torturing her for the answers, I think even if she did stand in public the fact that everything is so shopped takes away any bravery from her. It's just a stupid picture of a fat woman with a warped edited background
>>
>>30816514
>>30816142
It's just too easy. It's not even a matter of drawing some fake eyes on. This bitches torso literally looks like a face.
I hope someone does shoop that.
>>
>>30815533
Only an idiot can't tell that she is edited into the edited photo.
Not only that, I believe that that edited photo is from the 70's.
>>
>>30816439
Madonna? Eww. No wonder she looks so trashy.

Though +1 for pretty great tits back then.
>>
File: 1401670243071.gif (2 MB, 300x227) Image search: [Google]
1401670243071.gif
2 MB, 300x227
>>30816872
>>
I know she's a degenerate but god damn that Madonna picture gives me a boner
>>
>>30816987
This guy gets it
>>
>>30816570
Wait, wait...

OKAY EVERYONE IN THIS THREAD, LISTEN UP!

Is it at all possible that she flat out Photoshopped all of her other half-naked shots, such as her being on a train in her underwear covered in shitty writing?

Does anyone know if that one and her others ones are also shopped?
>>
>>30816987
Let me help you out.

Yes, she's edited into that picture, it is clear... BUT that doesn't mean she wasn't outside in public somewhere like she claims.

That edit photo isn't from the 70's, that's the fucking One World Trade Center.

And while I'm at it, the Madonna pic is the 90's.
>>
She wasn't the photographer though, was she? It was some company called "Shameless Photography". I'd like to hear what they have to say about it.
>>
File: 1401931846good458778.jpg (762 KB, 1451x1024) Image search: [Google]
1401931846good458778.jpg
762 KB, 1451x1024
>>30816142
is good?
>>
Thumbnail looks like 6 tits like a pregnant dog
>>
File: 1386632490991.png (81 KB, 259x377) Image search: [Google]
1386632490991.png
81 KB, 259x377
>>30817116
I have no idea who she is, what these other pictures are, or why I should care.
>>
>30817116
I'm not sure, but she is fucking disgusting
http://www.denisejollyspoken.com/#!gallery/cff9
>>
>>30817206
Lel
>>
>>30816850
Now without the boxes.
>>
>>30817305
>>30815533

and

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/denise-jolly/be-beautiful-how-30-days-nearly-naked-changed-life_b_3943938.html

And by Madonna we mean the past her prime popstar/dancer/singer that shocked the world with her "SEX" book in the 90's (and a million other things).
>>
Uh the "brave" part was obviously about her even circulating a photo of herself naked

You literally have autism, don't you?
>>
>>30817426
Posting a nude pic and taking a nude pic in public are on two different levels of brave.
>>
And Denise would certainly know that... and feel the need to lie about taking the pic publicly. If the point was just the nude picture, why bother with the detailed desctiption of the photoshoot?
>>
don't let this die, working on requested pic
>>
>>30817191
>entire background, foreground are fake
>props are edited in
>even the ground she's standing on is photoshopped
>the lighting doesn't match being outside as well
>HUURRRRRR NOW GUYS LETS NOT BE TOO HASTY WE HAVE NO PROOF SHE DIDN'T TAKE THE PICTURE OF AT LEAST HERSELF OUTSIDE

So everything is faked...

Including the LIGHTING, which SHOWS she wasn't outside...

And this could "totally still be real and brave"?

Spot the Feminist shill.
>>
>>30818146
I want to publicly call out her and Shameless Photography to produce the original unedited photo of her nude.
>>
more?
>>
File: 1401931846458.jpg (376 KB, 1451x1024) Image search: [Google]
1401931846458.jpg
376 KB, 1451x1024
>>30817206
>>
File: monster.png (490 KB, 583x804) Image search: [Google]
monster.png
490 KB, 583x804
>>
>>30816142
>mons
delivared
>>
>>30818697
>>30818916
Dis gon get gud
>>
File: Brai.jpg (38 KB, 600x300) Image search: [Google]
Brai.jpg
38 KB, 600x300
>>30818916
>>
>>30815904
She distorts gravity in such a way that light bends around her.

Check your Gravity-typical privilege!
>>
>>30818697
hard to tell the difference between the two parts of her body, bitch is disgusting
>>
>>30815533
Is that the fucking World Trade Center in the background?
>>
>>30816872
Is that what happens when skin has to expand and contract repeatedly? What does this to a body? Reminds me of the pic with censors over her lower pair of tits.
>>
>>30819616
Be nice, she's a very brave liar.
>>
>>30818916
Fuck, there go my sides.
>>
>>30819642
Yes, that is the new One World Trade Center in the background. It's a real-ish background. See the google maps picture and link. They flipped it left/right. It's from John St in the Brooklyn... kinda.
>>
>>30819775
Is she so fucking fat that in realitys attempt to carry her it retroactively brought back the twin towers?

Fucking reality warper
>>
File: o_O.png (72 KB, 590x534) Image search: [Google]
o_O.png
72 KB, 590x534
>>30815533
>>
>>30815533
>Left: Sex icon. Bold assertion for women's liberation. (Call the police. I DGAF.)
>Right: A coward and a slob.

Fuck her and her melted ice cream body.
>>
>>30819353
>>30818916
>>30818697
>>30817206

t o p h e h
>>
>>30818916
Wonderful, if it only had a cop with a pelican head we would have ourselves a nice max ernst collage.
>>
>>30819953
I can look at gore and not react at all, but that...
I feel sick.
>>
>>30815533

DAMN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BEING FAT IS NOT AN ACCOMPLISHMENT
>>
>>30815533
right has no shadow
>>
>>30815533
Fat bitch looks about 15 feet tall in that picture.
>>
>>30815533
If this is real the only brave thing she did was put herself in a position to be run over.

And I'd have run her over.
>>
>>30815533
How could anyone look at that picture and not immediately know it's a shop?
>>
File: 1401936727459.png (1 MB, 1451x1024) Image search: [Google]
1401936727459.png
1 MB, 1451x1024
>>30815533
>>
>>30820312
>right has no shadow
Burn the witch? Burn the witch.
>>
>>30819905
One World Trade Center =/= World Trade Center
>>
File: Vomiting02.jpg (11 KB, 150x203) Image search: [Google]
Vomiting02.jpg
11 KB, 150x203
>>30820404
>>
>>30816872
Should add 2 more bars to her lower udders
>>
>>30820457
Can we make her even fatter?
>>
>>30815533
>she's been doing TV interviews, wrote an article in the Huffington post about the brave moment and so on.

It looks shooped. But did she actually say in interviews that she went out in the public and had the picture taken? Did she discuss details of her being out in public taking this pic?

If so, she's a lying cunt.

If not, and she is merely talking about showing off her nasty ass body to the internet, then this isn't a big deal.
>>
>>30820380
We all know it's a shop.
But was she even out in public, or did she GO OUT OF HER WAY to lie about it?
Let's ask Shameless Photography
>>
>>30820533
I don't think that's within the realm of physics. Black magick, maybe?
>>
thats so fucking obviously shopped its hard to believe anyone is surprised by that
>>
>>30820582
>If not, and she is merely talking about showing off her nasty ass body to the internet, then this isn't a big deal.
It's not a matter of it being a "big deal", she's ugly and trying to ride the coattails of braver, prettier, more successful women. She thinks we need to be subjected to her awful body and mind.

What Madonna did is fucking punk, what this loser did is trite and impotent. She deserves the ridicule she's actually asking for. She wants to be a victim, a fool in the town square we all throw our rotten food at. She's a masochist as much as she is a big white piggy.
>>
>>30815533

Are people that fucking stupid to think that's not shopped?

Hell I've been seeing that picture around for a few days (weeks?) now and I didn't know it was supposed to be perceived as real. I mean it's obvious.
>>
>>30820731
>What Madonna did is fucking punk
No, it was just slutty.
>>
>>30820582
From her Huffington Post article linked earlier:

"It was Thursday afternoon when I stepped out of the cab wearing my favorite polka dress, high heels and a handbag. My panties were tucked safely in the right pocket of a winter coat I had draped over my forearm. It was March in Brooklyn, which meant it looked like spring but felt like winter. I met the Shameless Photography team a block and a half from where the shoot took place to check in, fix my hair and practice my stance before walking to the shoot location separately, secret agent style. We met covertly, knowing that once my dress came off we wouldn't have much time to get the shot of a 6 ft tall, 300 lb. woman standing butt naked in Brooklyn, New York without attracting some serious attention. "

I heard her live interview in the break room at work, wich is pretty much always on CNN if you want to dig it up.
>>
>>30820824
>No, it was just slutty.
yeah, but also she clearly doesn't give a fuck. Hey, this is like the only thing I like that Madonna has ever done. This is her John Waters moment. She's "sexy" as much as she's ugly, lewd and crude. Let me have this.
>>
>>30820811
No, but she said very clearly she did the shoot in public...

"It was Thursday afternoon when I stepped out of the cab wearing my favorite polka dress, high heels and a handbag. My panties were tucked safely in the right pocket of a winter coat I had draped over my forearm. It was March in Brooklyn, which meant it looked like spring but felt like winter. I met the Shameless Photography team a block and a half from where the shoot took place to check in, fix my hair and practice my stance before walking to the shoot location separately, secret agent style. We met covertly, knowing that once my dress came off we wouldn't have much time to get the shot of a 6 ft tall, 300 lb. woman standing butt naked in Brooklyn, New York without attracting some serious attention. "
>>
>>30820824
punk + female = slutty
>>
>>30820872
then she's worse than a coward shooting this from the safety of some echo chamber studio. She's also a liar. A bland, unoriginal liar.

And I noticed it was shopped from the fucking terrible perspective and lack of "gravity" (lol) from her figure. She looks like a magazine cut out collage of the damned.
>>
>>30821013
naked woman hitchhiking = slutty
>>
>>30820872
>we wouldn't have much time to get the shot of a 6 ft tall, 300 lb. woman standing butt naked in Brooklyn, New York without doing some serious damage to the sidewalk. "
>>
>>30821013
>punk + female = slutty
did someone say Wendy O Williams?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcvgDDgma5o
>>
File: 1401293235431.png (112 KB, 344x320) Image search: [Google]
1401293235431.png
112 KB, 344x320
>>30815533
The background of the land whales photo looks like GTA IV.
>>
somebody archive this on 4archive.org when it winds down... I gotta go now
>>
>>30821397

Or maybe it looks like this
>>30816343

Fom that google maps link
>>
>>30820273

that's because you know this thing is still alive and growing more grotesque by the day.
>>
i could tell it was shopped before i started reading what you said

her body has no shadow.
>>
>>30815533
Maybe she stood outside in a deserted parking lot for the original picture, then they added the background to make it look not so retarded and reinforce it's in NY. She's still a fraud though.
>>
>>30821603
Still missing the point, we all know it's shooped. OP said it's shooped. Fatty said she was nude in public and gives a detailed written account
>>
>>30816850
Someone edit in "FAGGOT" on the numberplate of the car that drives by.
>>
File: realshoah.jpg (10 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
realshoah.jpg
10 KB, 480x360
>>30821948
>"BUT IT WAS REAL IN MY MIND"
>>
>>30816343
Hey! I work there. It's DUMBO.

I have no idea who this fat whale of tub is, but I can assure that I didn't hear any dur butter churning. I'm guess IT would've made a nasty sound.
>>
>>30820404
hahahaha stop it /pol/ I can't breathe
>>
File: preventable causes of death.jpg (37 KB, 482x437) Image search: [Google]
preventable causes of death.jpg
37 KB, 482x437
>>30815533
>22
Her stupid smug face on top of everything else just tops off my hatred

This whole fat acceptance thing is a drag.
YOU SHOULD NOT BE PROUD OF BEING FAT, unless you're a sumo wrestler

It's like being a smoker and being proud of their tar filled lungs, because being a fat fuck is not far off in terms of health risks (obesity is not far behind tobacco in number of deaths)
>>
Her poem, "I love dick" (I shit you not)

>wow so prolific

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D31E77T294Y
>>
Beauty is part genetics and part social construct.

In no world, no time will that blob on the left ever be accepted as anything but grotesque, DNA simply wont allow it.
>>
>>30823067
err right. I ment her left.
>>
>>30822785
Why isnt obesity illegal?
>>
>>30822487
Dude, I work in Dumbo too, how immediately fucking off did that piece of shit picture look? The moment I glanced at it I'm like holy fuck, this place doesn't exist.
>>
>>30816128
they are oppressed more.

all dat gravity mang.
>>
File: 1306777381566.png (57 KB, 255x255) Image search: [Google]
1306777381566.png
57 KB, 255x255
>>30816872
>mfw she's so fat that she doesn't need black bars over her pussy
Thread replies: 117
Thread images: 22

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.