Press F to respects for the Brobot.
>>80514172
F
Rip based R2Dindu
>>80514172
I order you n-not to go...
:<
Where did ISIS get these weapons from?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=32&v=F1oipMSuQd0
Since when doesnt pol care about something like this?
come on guys this is huge
>>80514138
I pay respect to that RUS pilot. I hope whoever shot the helicopter down gets butchered.
Indian dude got a thread and wasnt banned, but remember theres a double standard
And I dont respond to stup8d troll posts, serious questions only. I can drop se4ious red pills on frum Jewry cause Im an insider.
>>80514083
We reform hate and you and want to kill you. I have no questions for you backwards scum. "Modern Orthodox" lol.
>>80514083
what exactly is the difference between haridi and hassidic jews?
I know one id a sect of the other, but what exactly makes the division.
Also why are the all such awesome dancers?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAzk0wSsKcE
I really dont hate anyone, but some of you righ-wingers really piss me off. Posting dead muslims, muslims getting tortured, etc.. And it's getting really annoying atm, sure, you dont have to love islam, but atleast respect the religion. Can you? I'm not a muslim, im an atheist, but i still respect islam.
If you dislike islam, atleast give us a good reason for it, and dont post edgy and retarded stuff, because its not funny.
This will sound a little weird but, 50% of my friends are muslims, and guess what /pol/? They dont rape, they dont kill. Theyre really nice. And my dad and mother divorced like 3 years ago, and my moms new boyfriend is a muslim, and hes one of the nicest person ive ever met in my entire life. There are some bad muslims, yes there are, but that doesnt mean all of them are bad, same with christians, not all of them are bad. And ISIS is a terrorist group, they dont represent islam.
Im not gonna say islam is a peaceful religion, but its definitely not a war religion.
I beg you /pol/, please stop, its getting really annoying.
>inb4 HURR DURR SWEDEN YES XDD
>go prep yoru bull
>t. ahmed
>>80490267
SWEDEN YES
>>80490267
>be sweden
>noone cares your stupid thread
>>80490316
Nice response.
No arguments?, i bet you dont even dare to debate me
Argument to counter all stupidi atheists
> Do we agree that by our defintion god, is the greatest thing imaginable?
>But you, As an atheist, say that the greatest thing we could ever imagine is limited to our own imagination?
>Because we just agreed that things that exist have a higher quality than things that exist in our own imagination and therefore god must exist because he is the greatest thing we could imagine and if he is the greatest thing than he must exist for things that exist have a higher quality than things that don't exist
Checkmate atheists
Lmao god don't real. The bible isn't real either
things imagined don't exist
things that EXIST exist
things that don't exist have no quality (outside an imagination) therefore something that exists has any quality exceeds the zero quality in the real world that the imagined element has.
>>80513905
>let me construct an argument out of assumptions, like one would construct a car out of poop
>why is my poop-car not running something must be wrong with it checkmate atheists
a us citizen was able to fly his homemade helicopter into the white house. yet they somehow can't manage to blow up the washington monument?
>>80513739
dam these are really equivalent things
i hate the americans now
Because attacking government figures doesn't instill as much fear into the populace as an attack on a school, workplace, or neighborhood.
An attack on a government building doesn't make me afraid that much but an attack on a school or at a public place puts me on edge because that could easily happen to me.
>>80513739
Because they are cowards = mc2
Drumpf BTFO by the trashman http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3nfLjbvvpC8
>>80513600
>1 post by this ID
>>80513600
>le he says crazy things to get cites maymay
Wtf I hate trump now
>>80514078
Votes*
God dammit
>women allowed to joust at english heritage tournament for first time, breaking one of the last gender barriers in British culture
>/pol/ is against this
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/23/women-allowed-to-joust-at-english-heritage-tournament-for-first/
WE WUZ KNITES N SHIT YO
The bigotry in this place is disgusting.
>>80513508
>history
>heritage
>womyn knights
Youre doing it wrong!
>>80514236
Have you never heard of Joan of Arc and Queen Arthur
>>80515529
joan of arc was a glorified cheerleader
>queen arthur
anime isn't real.
Be honest /pol/.
Will it happen?
>>80513453
There are too many white SJWs siding with blacks to make it happen, simultaneously, many BLM members hate the fact that whites are siding with them, so maybe if BLM turns on the SJWs, and manages to gain enough support from blacks in America, it'll happen. BLM has already spread to the UK so it's clearly got alot of support already.
Humans are getting less violent over time (except middle east). If a race war were going t happen, it would have happened a hundred years ago before wars eliminated the most violent members of our species.
http://yournewswire.com/russia-put-black-lives-matter-on-official-terror-list/
>>80513126
Beautiful.
>>80513126
Based.
>>80513126
putin is the best.
Should we ban the sale of guns to blacks? or just to criminals?
Get that faggot scooby outa here
>ReportOfTheWeek
I wanna see what kind of mormon nutjobs this guys parents are
>>80512851
We shouldn't ban the sale of guns to any citizen who is not currently incarcerated in a prison or mental institution.
The media uses hyper perfect women, so women will go out and purchase products that will help them model themselves after what they see in the media. It's a brilliant financial scheme really
But why don't we see that with dudes in the media?
I mean fuck even in The Wolf of Wall street, Leo's woman counterpart is in way better shape than he is. Hell, I'm in better shape than Leo is, who has a borderline skinnyfat body.
my question is - why aren't men held to the same standards in media as women?
>>80512747
Women are the ones spending money like it's going out of style. Ergo, smart advertisers pander to women.
>>80512747
The wolf of wallstreet was also filthy fucking rich.
Men aren't judged by out pocketbook so much as we are judged by our success in other realms.
>>80512747
It doesn't work the same way on men, they give less of a fuck naturally
The south will rise again.
>mfw people need to lie to themselves just to stay sane
>>80512839
You're probably a nigger.
>>80512991
Wrong again faggot. Keep lying to yourself though. It's none of my business. If that helps you keep your shit together. Some people believe in God and others believe the South will rise again.
So...here's my line of thinking, as purely logical as possible.
The best possible world is desirable, and therefore should be worked towards in all respects.
One aspect of the best possible world is that is has only the best possible rulers.
Therefore we should attempt to put only the best possible rulers in power.
The best possible ruler makes the life of their subjects the best possible life.
To do this, the best possible ruler must have two qualities. They must have the best interests of their subject(s) at heart, and they must understand their subject(s) enough to know what those interests are in any given scenario. If they have both these things, they will give their subjects the best possible life.
The first requirement is simple enough, but the second is the truly difficult part. It may be impossible for a ruler to truly understand subjects that are entirely different from them, but we'll forget that for the moment and come back to it later.
In any event, the best possible ruler has the best possible understanding of their subject(s)
It takes time for a ruler to increase and maintain their understanding of their subjects.
There is finite time in the day.
Therefore the best possible ruler has the fewest number of subjects so that they can have the greatest possible understanding of each of these subjects.
If the population remains the same but the number of subjects per ruler decreases, the number of rulers must increase.
It is therefore desirable to have as few subjects as possible and as many rulers as possible, as this will result in the best possible rulers.
The fewest number of subjects is one, and the greatest number of rulers is everyone.
Therefore, everyone should be the ruler of only one subject (themselves, who they understand the best and whose best interests they must have at heart) and no one else, if we truly desire to move towards the best possible world.
What does /pol/ think?
philosophy is so fucking retarded. all that great philosophy and the greek and roman empires still fell to bread and circus politics.
gibs>logic
>write 2000 character post detailing logic and reasoning behind non-standard political views
>1 unrelated reply
>write 2 sentence shitpost about brexit/BLM/trump
>hits bump limit, discussion continues until 404
Hwy.
>>80512551
That is one aspect.
The greatest number of rulers, unfortunately, guarantees that the vast majority of the rulers are objectively bad rulers, with strongly conflicting interests in regard of all other rulers. This would not contribute to the best possible world.
It's time to ban bulls
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/10/world/europe/bulls-in-spain-kill-2-and-gore-2-others.html
Just the high capacity automatic full assault-types or all of them?
>>80512307
just get some americucks to prep them first next time.
>>80512307
It is time for you to worry about your own country, and leave mine alone.
