Trump can never recover from this. Cruz is basically guanrateed the nomination now! Trumpfags BTFO!
FUCKING
LEAF
Are they pol approved?
>>71651632
just another kebab
>>71651632
no, especially filth like munayev
>>71651774
How is he filth?
Why Indians don't eat cows
https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/4fueb2/why_indians_dont_eat_cow/
Smart boy
>>71651571
Because they eat shit, smell shit, and even look like jaywalking shits. Just like indians
>>71651665
So much shit
>>71651665
Fpbp
>be European
>get arrested for saying you don't like Muslims
>""""""""free""""""" speech
lmfao
>>71651419
Be American. Get arrested for importing a kinder egg.
>>71651497
>muh shitty chocolate eggs
This really pales in comparison.
>71651419
>Be American
>Get shot before you can voice your opinion
No Surrender!
Fuck the Pope and the IRA!
>>71651500
why are you guys so tirelessly partisan, paranoid and aggressive
what's the FUCKING point, just calm the fuck down and live in peace mate
>>71651230
>tfw live in Derry
>the Protestants area has "NO SURRENDER" painted on the entrance
>tfw only 17,000 Protestants left because they all "surrendered" and moved away from the ebil caflicks
>tfw Belfast youth are now majority Catholic aswell
Éireann go brách
How do I stop feminine cancer in my school.
18 and senior
>>71651166
Start a gentlemen's club.
Why are the homeless are always men?
Why are the dirtiest and lowest paid jobs done by men?
>>71651166
can you even rotate your fucking image
AP:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBIT_PRINCE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-04-21-13-32-53
Live news -
FOX:
http://www.hulkusc.com/watch-fox-news-live-streaming/
CNN:
http://www.hulkusc.com/cnn-news-live-streaming/
MSNBC:
http://www.hulkusc.com/watch-msnbc-live-streaming/
Anybody want to play a game of basketball?
Prince's musical inspiration was ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eJYHpV7BU0
WE
>>71650766
nigger stop it
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUyDcGSMPEQ
WAZ
Hey is this board ironic?
>>71650699
no
they actually think its logically consistant to hold these views, similar to tumblr and reddit
It used to be a bunch of leftists ironically acting authoritarian, then the newfags misconstrued it as it being serious, so now the demographic of /pol/ are "mature" /b/tards
>>71650699
figure it out for yourself like the rest of us did
When did you start hating women, /pol/?
When my mother divorced my father and fed me the "he has a girlfriend" lie. He's never been more unhappy and I wish I could spend more time with him.
>>71650592
i dont hate them, i just dont trust them.
>>71650592
Autumn last year
post the minorities of your country that you would happily deport
i'll start
albanians
arabs in general
gyppos
nigs
Italians
alle
>>71650851
nice
Defend this, /pol/.
Doesn't need defending. It's right.
>>71650429
>Silverstone
Every fucking time
>>71650480
FPBP. Jackson shouldn't be on it either though.
So i got a problem i dont really know how to deal so i thought i could get advice from you guys or maybe i just want get it off my chest.
My Parents thinking about being divorced, my mother told me today. I didnt really knew how to react.
I will try to sum up as good as possible.
>me 21 and my brother 19. I am doing my trainee for IT in the second year
>its kinda more 'schoolish' so i dont get any money, but i have a part time job every saturday so i have enough money to keep me over water
>parents own 2 houses, one i live with my brother and the second my parents live there (pretty 'old' house so they have much work to do
>i dont really got the reasons for the divorce and my mother said they dont really going to do it just "thinking" about it
>reasons are like, my father got pretty religious, dont what to go to vacation with her (maybe because of not enough money, i dont know) and he doesnt "love" her
>i have the feeling she has nothing to do even though she is working and its getting boring for her
>wants to live for 3-4 days with me and my brother
>i told her they should act like kids and get it together, because even if i dont like my brother, i cant divorce him, family is family
>tells me random reasons with father again
>told her if they divorce i maybe wont have contact with both
Maybe i overreacted with the contact but i really dont like this.
Also my father his brother and his wife divorced recently too, and her wife talked earlier with my mother and my father with his brother. If it has anything to do with it, all russians.
Did someone else went through stuff like that? I dont really know how to act and i have already now enough stress with all (went to a doctor not long ago and he told me i should relax more).
Ha! some guy that is not your father is going to fuck your mummy soon. And you will be in the nearest room hearing it
>>71650588
Thanks.
Bump for replies and i hope its not a spaintard
>A decline in courage may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in the West in our days. The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately, in each country, each government, each political party, and, of course, in the United Nations. Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling groups and the intellectual elite, causing an impression of loss of courage by the entire society. Of course, there are many courageous individuals, but they have no determining influence on public life.
>Political and intellectual bureaucrats show depression, passivity, and perplexity in their actions and in their statements, and even more so in theoretical reflections to explain how realistic, reasonable, as well as intellectually and even morally worn it is to base state policies on weakness and cowardice. And decline in courage is ironically emphasized by occasional explosions of anger and inflexibility on the part of the same bureaucrats when dealing with weak governments and with countries not supported by anyone, or with currents which cannot offer any resistance. But they get tongue-tied and paralyzed when they deal with powerful governments and threatening forces, with aggressors and international terrorists.
>Should one point out that from ancient times declining courage has been considered the beginning of the end?
>When the modern Western states were created, the principle was proclaimed that governments are meant to serve man and man lives to be free and to pursue happiness. See, for example, the American Declaration of Independence. Now, at last, during past decades technical and social progress has permitted the realization of such aspirations: the welfare state.
>Every citizen has been granted the desired freedom and material goods in such quantity and of such quality as to guarantee in theory the achievement of happiness -- in the morally inferior sense of the word which has come into being during those same decades. In the process, however, one psychological detail has been overlooked: the constant desire to have still more things and a still better life and the struggle to attain them imprint many Western faces with worry and even depression, though it is customary to conceal such feelings. Active and tense competition fills all human thoughts without opening a way to free spiritual development.
>The individual's independence from many types of state pressure has been guaranteed. The majority of people have been granted well-being to an extent their fathers and grandfathers could not even dream about. It has become possible to raise young people according to these ideals, leaving them to physical splendor, happiness, possession of material goods, money, and leisure, to an almost unlimited freedom of enjoyment. So who should now renounce all this? Why? And for what should one risk one's precious life in defense of common values and particularly in such nebulous cases when the security of one's nation must be defended in a distant country? Even biology knows that habitual, extreme safety and well-being are not advantageous for a living organism. Today, well-being in the life of Western society has begun to reveal its pernicious mask.
>Western society has given itself the organization best suited to its purposes based, I would say, one the letter of the law. The limits of human rights and righteousness are determined by a system of laws; such limits are very broad. People in the West have acquired considerable skill in interpreting and manipulating law. Any conflict is solved according to the letter of the law and this is considered to be the supreme solution. If one is right from a legal point of view, nothing more is required. Nobody will mention that one could still not be entirely right, and urge self-restraint, a willingness to renounce such legal rights, sacrifice and selfless risk. It would sound simply absurd. One almost never sees voluntary self-restraint. Everybody operates at the extreme limit of those legal frames.
>I have spent all my life under a Communist regime and I will tell you that a society without any objective legal scale is a terrible one indeed. But a society with no other scale than the legal one is not quite worthy of man either. A society which is based on the letter of the law and never reaches any higher is taking very scarce advantage of the high level of human possibilities. The letter of the law is too cold and formal to have a beneficial influence on society. Whenever the tissue of life is woven of legalistic relations, there is an atmosphere of moral mediocrity, paralyzing man's noblest impulses. And it will be simply impossible to stand through the trials of this threatening century with only the support of a legalistic structure.
>In today's Western society the inequality has been revealed [in] freedom for good deeds and freedom for evil deeds. A statesman who wants to achieve something important and highly constructive for his country has to move cautiously and even timidly. There are thousands of hasty and irresponsible critics around him; parliament and the press keep rebuffing him. As he moves ahead, he has to prove that each single step of his is well-founded and absolutely flawless. Actually, an outstanding and particularly gifted person who has unusual and unexpected initiatives in mind hardly gets a chance to assert himself. From the very beginning, dozens of traps will be set out for him. Thus, mediocrity triumphs with the excuse of restrictions imposed by democracy.
>It is feasible and easy everywhere to undermine administrative power and in fact it has been drastically weakened in all Western countries. The defense of individual rights has reached such extremes as to make society as a whole defenseless against certain individuals. It's time, in the West -- It is time, in the West, to defend not so much human rights as human obligations.
>Destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society appears to have little defense against the abyss of human decadence, such as, for example, misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. It is considered to be part of freedom and theoretically counterbalanced by the young people's right not to look or not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
UK thread desu
> be me
> right wing libertarian
> pro eu
am I retarded?
>right wing
>libertarian
pick one.
There's literally nothing wrong with the EU
>>71650434
Better stop posting britbong
![2000px-Political_chart.svg[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/4aXRVR9.png "2000px-Political chart.svg[1]")