>voting for a racist
>voting
>>73063123
Yeah, I mean who would ever vote Hillary?
>not voting for a racist
The only way I would vote desu
Protestants and jews have the exact same mentality and character as far as i could observe and as far as history goes. Protestants fled england after the civil war and constructed america against the indians residing there and got their independence from england colonies, much like the way jews made it in israel after the holocaust.
this is why jews find it so easy to live in america and succeed,
Should say american protestants, but i guess thats obvious.
Anyhow, I think jews just fit the cultural bill perfectly.
>tfw Protestant
I agree, Catholics and their Romanic Satanism are destroying this country
>"We can contain hillary if she gets elected."
What did he shill by this?
>>73062795
Is he still Assblasted about El Rato dropping out?
>>73062795
I give the Blaze 12 months before liquidation.
>>73062795
He's full retard today
Reminder that Geert will rule the world.
Literally who
>Again
>>73063831
Their navy was pretty elite in the 17th century
http://teamyee.tv/lip-service-the-blog-can-guys-and-girls-be-platonic/
Can men and women be friends?
>>73020247
Of course not. The only thing women are good for is sex. If your not having sex with ber she is more than likely taking advantage of you.
>>73020247
Do you have female friends op? Tell me are any of them great?
Not close ones except under true outlier circumstances.
>>73062722
He was right.
Esther Griggs in 1858 threw her child out of a first floor window believing that the house was on fire, while having a night terror. In real life she successfully defended herself from a charge of murder using the defence of automatism - that is, not having control over her own body, which therefore meant not that she did not have the mens rea (guilty mind) but rather that she could not have committed the actus reus (guilty act) due to the lack of control.
Here we diverge from reality. Assume that the case takes place in the modern day, not 1858.
The legal system has been ordered to prosecute her for the murder of her baby. In scenario one you are sitting on the jury, and you are such an illustrious person that the jury will vote whichever way you do. The defence has argued as above, in accordance with reality. The prosecution has argued that Griggs, who has a long history of night terrors and episodes of automatism, put herself in a position to lose control - much like a driver asleep at the wheel is still at fault not for crashing the car (which, because he was asleep, he obviously could not control) but rather for driving in a condition where he would fall asleep and lose control. The prosecution argues Griggs is guilty of murder.
What say you?
In scenario 2, you are now the judge. The jury has returned a guilty verdict and Mrs Griggs will now be sentenced by you. There is no mandatory minimum sentence. You have the option of imposing a fine of any number of penalty units (with 1 penalty unit being 1 day's wage for a median worker), community service of so many hours, or a custodial sentence (jail time) with the possibility of some or all being suspended. Bear in mind the goals of sentencing: deterrence, security of the community, denunciation of crime, punishment, and rehabilitation. Bear in mind also that your role as the sentencing judge is not to determine guilt but to impose appropriate sentences for whom the jury finds guilty.
Guilty verdict of what? Manslaughter? Not enough information to make an informed legal sentence. If Manslaughter than mandatory rehabilitation and therapy for her night terrors for a period of 6 months with no punitive damages. I assume it's not murder as there is no minimum sentence with there being one for murder.
As a juror she is clearly not guilty, as the only action she could have taken could have also resulted in potential damages in the case of a real emergency (blockade her door, lock her child in a room, etc). There were no reasonable alternative, nor is there any reason to believe she suspected her automatism would lead to this outcome.
>>73062703
First of all, let's imagine that the fire were real. Would throwing her baby out the first floor (I assume you're using British floor numbering, so the second floor to all us Americans), really have been the smartest thing to do?
>>73063500
No, but a genuine good faith attempt to assist during a crisis should not open one up for punishment, even if the attempt lacked necessary forethought. Doing so would set a precedent of abstaining from aid for fear of prosecution (this may already be the case, I don't know I don't start law school until august).
Assalamu Alaikum my brothers(and sisters). For long /pol/ been center of white nationalist 80 iq nazis.. But this is about to change. /pol/ will be not place for crusader circlejerk anymore.We (Muslims of /pol/) Has been growing rapidly in this board. And i believe we will make up half of this board in 2020. Westerners who bomb and exploit our muslim brothers make our brothers discover sites like Reddit, 4chan bit late. but we are here alhamdülillah. With honor and Pride.
points we can discuss
•Do you think we should allow baastard west to draw our prophet if the picture is respectful?
•Why does america celebrate ""cristmas"" and not Ramadan? Where is fairness?
•Do you get offended when infidels tell you "merry" ""christmas"" / "Happy" ""new year""? What do you do when they tell you this?
•Do you think the continuous fake hate propaganda directed toward us in the west will cause pogroms in the future
•Do you think it's permissible to say mashallah to a non muslim person?
and
Joining Islam is not a conversion; it is a homecoming, it is reverting to the original faith of mankind. nothing is better.
Haha
Mashallah brother. Today Britainistan will elect it's first Muslim mayor, the first step to implementing Sharia.
Soon we will be a single muslim community and share our wealth with Turkey.
>>73062616
The gas chamber is that way. Do us all a favor gas yourself.
>"Oi you cheeky cunt, did I just see you try to get away with only praying three roo'kas during 'assar prayers? Do you take Allah for a mug?! Get in the van!"
>>73062538
what you gonna do, make bang noises?
>>73062538
Holy shit did British really speak like that? make me kek everytime.
But it's only 6 bong and 5 bings, I've got time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUXeN4TypTg
>>73114204
ayy lmao I made that image.
>>73114204
Is this what the shills have reduced us to?
Notice anything?
Int: germans to germans
>hungary
>they are turks
>romania
>they are smart
Okay Germany, how many romanians live in your country?
pokemon trainer reporting in
Switzerland? ATTACK ON TITAN NAO
http://www.thelocal.se/20160504/why-i-bared-my-breasts-for-a-school-photo
Taharrush.
But when a guy does it
http://www.newser.com/story/224529/kid-charged-after-flashing-genitals-in-yearbook-prank.html
>>73062187
>Swedes still think showing your tits is a sign of political activism
For fuck's sake, this hasn't been shocking since the 50's. At this point it's the pretentiousness that pisses me off, not the act itself. Try doing that in one of the many 90% shitskin schools. See what happens.
But no, we wouldn't DARE offend the muslims darlings!
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/04/politics/never-trump-voters/index.html?iid=ob_lockedrail_bottommedium
> New York (CNN) Lisa Bowers, a Republican voter in New Hampshire, grew hesitant when asked the question: If the race comes down to Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, who would you vote for?
> "Honestly," she paused, "I'd vote for Hillary Clinton. At least with her, you kind of know what you're dealing with. He's just a loose cannon."
> That was in December, when Bowers, 41, was sitting in the audience waiting for Jeb Bush to hold a town hall.
Months have passed.
> Reached Tuesday night, just as Trump was barreling towards the nomination following a decisive win in Indiana, Bowers said she's done a lot more research on the two candidates.
> "At this point, I would absolutely still vote for Hillary Clinton over Trump," she said. "It would be that, or not vote at all -- and I've never not voted."
What's Trump plan to bring back the divided republicans and take part of the independent & democrat electorate?
We don't want traitors.
>>73062170
No, the decision isn't though. It's quite simple. #NeverTrump means #NeverTrump and NOTHING he can say or do will win us over. Period.
>I'd vote for Hillary Clinton. At least with her, you kind of know what you're dealing with.
People actually have brain function and believe this at the same time?
Know what you're dealing with?
Someone that has been a cog in the US war machine of funding terrorism, blackmail, corruption, and countless deaths for 20 years?
Is it worse to be a conservative than a murderer in 2016 America?
You really are beyond help, Serbia and the Balkans may be a shithole but we'll be circling your bones long after your empire collapses.
I miss ¡Jeb!
His autistic shenanigans will be missed
>>73062006
I miss him too. Imagine if he had stayed in the race for this long.
>>73062006
I only miss Yeb because he was a good punching bag.
what were the jeb memes? i only know guac and low energy
You're dragging down MUH LABOR RATE
>>73018666
Hitler did it better
