Why do we pander to 0.2% of the population again?
>>73394439
Because it makes money. People eat this shit up because they think it puts them on the right side of history. It isn't pandering its business. If you think vf gives a shit about transgendered people your as stupid as the people who read this shit.
Government Psy-OPs testing tolerance level of it's mass's.
>>73394627
>testing
dohhoho
JUST
>Taking advice from a loser
>>73395114
Cucks like him belong in a mass grave.
>>73395114
then why dont you start with your own homes? open them up to everyone to come and go as they please
ohh you wont? why is that you hypocritical unintelligent obnoxious traitorous human trash
top kek
>>73394301
jenny pa parle francais
>>73394301
what does this even say you fucking kraut?
Translate please, I don't speak cuck.
>about 70% of all games are programmed by Indian developers
>Lots of games are outsourced to Indian studios
>India is responsible for some of the best programmers on earth
We are behind most of your technology, yet you still treat us like shit, why?
Because you have a town called Poo.
Poo, India
You can literally point to India on a map and say "Look, it's poo!" and you won't be wrong.
Indians are shit.
>>73394032
I guess that's why modern games are so shitty
Welp I guess this it then... the happening /pol/ has been waiting for
>>73394842
You think St. Helens was bad, wait until you see Rainier.
>>73394842
>the happening /pol/ has been waiting for
A giant Hitler is going to come out of Mount Saint Helens and squash all the Jews, niggers and spics?
>>73395088
IT BEGINDS
Your opinion /pol/
breeding
>>73394018
fpbp
Imbibing mongolian seed.
>search catalog
>no YLYL
let's fix that. YLYL and /pol/ humor thread. Bonus points for fresh OC
Bump bump
First, let’s face the fact that people like to have sex, and sex without birth control makes babies—and there was no birth control at the time. But people didn’t mind having a lot of children because children had become the basis of wealth. In an agricultural society, every pair of hands produces wealth; you don’t have to be able to read or program computers to weed, seed, or harvest. Children were also the basis for retirement, if someone lived long enough to have an old age. There was no Social Security, but you counted on your children to take care of you. Part of this was custom, but part of it was rational economic thinking. A father owned land or had the right to farm it. His child needed to have access to the land to live, so the father could dictate policy.
As children brought families prosperity and retirement income, the major responsibility of women was to produce as many children as possible. If women had children, and if they both survived childbirth, the family as a whole was better off. This was a matter of luck, but it was a chance worth taking from the standpoint of both families and the men who dominated them. Between lust and greed, there was little reason not to bring more children into the world.
Habits are hard to change. When families began moving into cities en masse, children were still valuable assets. Parents could send them to work in primitive factories at the age of six and collect their pay. In early industrial society factory workers didn’t need many more skills than farm laborers did. But as factories became more complex, they had less use for six-year olds. Soon they needed somewhat educated workers. Later they needed managers with MBAs.
(continued below)
As the sophistication of industry advanced, the economic value of children declined. In order to continue being economically useful, children had to go to school to learn. Rather than adding to family income, they consumed family income. Children had to be clothed, fed, and sheltered, and over time the amount of education they needed increased dramatically, until today many “children” go to school until their mid-twenties and still have not earned a dime. According to the United Nations, the average number of years of schooling in the leading twenty-five countries in the world ranges from fifteen to seventeen.
The tendency to have as many babies as possible continued into the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Many of our grandparents or great-grandparents come from families that had ten children. A couple of generations before, you’d be lucky if three out of ten children survived. Now they were almost all surviving. However, in the economy of 1900, they could all head out and find work by the time they reached puberty. And that’s what most of them did.
Ten children in eighteenth-century France might have been a godsend. Ten children in late-nineteenth-century France might have been a burden. Ten children in late-twentieth-century France would be a catastrophe. It took a while for reality to sink in, but eventually it became clear that most children wouldn’t die and that children were extremely expensive to raise. Therefore, people started having a lot fewer children, and had those children more for the pleasure of having them than for economic benefits. Medical advances such as birth control helped achieve this, but the sheer cost of having and raising children drove the decline in birthrates. Children went from being producers of wealth to the most conspicuous form of consumption. Parents began satisfying their need for nurturing with one child, rather than ten.
Now let’s consider life expectancy. After all, the longer people live, the more people there will be at any given time. Life expectancy surged at the same time that infant mortality declined. In 1800, estimated life expectancy in Europe and the United States was about forty years. In 2000 it was close to eighty years. Life expectancy has, in effect, doubled over the last two hun dred years.
Continued growth in life expectancy is probable, but very few people anticipate another doubling. In the advanced industrial world, the UN projects a growth from seventy-six years in 2000 to eighty-two years in 2050. In the poorest countries it will increase from fifty-one to sixty-six. While this is growth, it is not geometric growth and it, too, is tapering off. This will also help reduce population growth.
The reduction process that took place decades ago in the advanced industrial world is now under way in the least developed countries. Having ten children in São Paolo is the surest path to economic suicide. It may take several generations to break the habit, but it will be broken. And it won’t return while the process of educating a child for the modern workforce continues to become longer and costlier. Between declining birthrates and slowing increases in life expectancy, population growth has to end.
THE POPULATION BUST AND THE WAY WE LIVE
What does all this have to do with international power in the twenty-first century? The population bust affects all nations. But it also affects the life cycles of people within these nations. Lower populations affect everything from the number of troops that can fight in a war to how many people there are in the workforce to internal political conflicts. The process we are talking about will affect more than just the number of people in a country. It will change how those people live, and therefore how those countries behave.
Let’s start with three core facts. Life expectancy is moving toward a high of eighty years in the advanced industrial world; the number of children women have is declining; and it takes longer and longer to become educated. A college education is now considered the minimum for social and economic success in advanced countries. Most people graduate from college at twenty-two. Add in law or graduate school, and people are not entering the workforce until their mid-twenties. Not everyone follows this pattern, of course, but a sizable portion of the population does and that portion includes most of those who will be part of the political and economic leadership of these countries.
As a result, marriage patterns have shifted dramatically. People are putting off marriage longer and are having children even later. Let’s consider the effect on women. Two hundred years ago, women started having children in their early teens. Women continued having children, nurturing them, and frequently burying them until they themselves died. This was necessary for the family’s well-being and that of society. Having and raising children was what women did for most of their lives.
This is the perfect girl for the future /pol/
>>73393840
She's gorgeous, but how can there be one kind of ideal girl?
>>73393840
The same mutts picture constantly being spammed, no thanks she is ugly as sin and I would have to be drunk as hell to make that creature passable.
She is more white than black
![0f0becf056b621e7c228a4d6020dba5455ee6d33[1].jpeg_w=1000&q=65&dpi=1&fm=pjpg&fit=crop&crop=faces&h=667.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/gdMB0ED.jpg "0f0becf056b621e7c228a4d6020dba5455ee6d33[1].jpeg w=1000&q=65&dpi=1&fm=pjpg&fit=crop&crop=faces&h=667")
Will Bernie supporters vote for Trump?
with a proper preparation, they will
The whole point of sanders' campaign is to mobilize far left college fags to vote for H.
So no.
Whats /pol/'s thoughts on the great war?
>>73393740
>just fuck my 20th and 21st centuries up fa.m
>>73393740
Utterly useless. Also Serbia's fault.
>>73393953
>how you want your borders in the middle east, pham?
I can't do this anymore /pol/. I got the money and nothing is holding me here in germany. Tell me, please, which first world country has the least muslim population? I honestly cant do this anymore. This placed is filled from every store to every house to every corner with fucking muslims. Anywhere you go, you hear islamshit gibberish being "talked".
I an sick and tired of not understanding anyone in this country. I do not belong here. And i am not even in a much infested region. I cant imagine how life is like in heavily infested areas and i dont want to.
So tell me, which country? Is the USA still ok? Which state? Massachusetts? Uta? I dont want to end up in a mexico-like state like california.
Hows Estonia? Or should i just move to asia? Japan?
>>73393726
Switzerland isn't your first choice?
>>73393726
Move to Perth. Everyone here is very right leaning and the women are alright. cost of life is pretty steep but australia pays really well if youre qualified. plus youre german so multiple languages just opens more windows for jobs.
dont go to brisbane tho
>>73394128
Schweiz aint safe.
>"Women and other minorities..."
>"women, especially women of color"
>trans women of colour.
You are a minority when you're discriminated against.
You are discriminated against when you're not a whit male.
So difficult?
Have you ever wished you were Indian?
No.
Lol no
"no"
Gary Johnson is polling double digits vs Trump and Hillary.
https://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32212254770/32212254991/32212254992/32212254994/32212254995/30064771087/7714a05b-515f-4ad3-bdaa-e72a6e5f8e61.pdf
>>73393490
i thought kasich dropped out
>>73393490
>H Ross Perot is back and he's ready to fuck shit up again
pls no
>>73393490
So...are you an actual libertardian or a DNC shill trying to split the GOP ticket?
