Hey, / po /
How can we set the diagram level?
only the numbers of steps of the diagram?
or we can also take into consideration the more realistic finish?
therefore the realists always more difficult?
Is there a pattern to classify? Example:
Steps 01-10 = Easy
Steps 01-30 = Intermediate
Steps 01-50 = Hard
Steps 01-100 = Complex
Steps 01 - ...... = Super Complex
Or more classifications that these cited?
Anyway, I wonder whether to classify a diagram or model, would use a critical sense and weigh those values. Rate only the steps of numbers? or evaluate the model in a general context?
Let me know of you, what do you think? / po /
>>533251
The number of steps depends on the diagram, not the complexity of the model.
A CP, for example, is a one step diagram.
To correctly classify the complexity of a model you need to take into account how complex are the steps and how clear are the instructions in that particular diagram of that model. The way you make the diagrams can change the difficulty of the model.
>>533251
The trouble is that after you figure how to fold something, it becomes simple in a manner of speaking.
I figure it's up to your discretion. I typically compare the model to other artists models and decide based on that. Who am I to argue difficulty with Kamiya?
>>533251
I'd say pivots and open sinks are intermediate, while closed sinks and extensive layer rearranging would be hard. Spreads are kind of borderline, and sometimes even open sinks can be a bitch. Super complex usually involves some sort of autistic tesselation.
Otherwise there's not really any pattern, no. I wouldn't depend on steps too much.
>>533251
Everything is one step if you get a pre-creased CP...
It really depends what you consider a single step as well.
