A6000 fag here Why aren't there any speedboosters for native
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
A6000 fag here
Why aren't there any speedboosters for native Sony e mount lenses?
There's Sony A to E mount speedboosters but I can't find and Sony E to E mount speedboosters
Did Sony shill me?
Did I waste my money on E mount lenses only to find I can't use a speedbooster on them?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1280 Image Height 960 Scene Capture Type Standard
am I supposed to be mad at Sony or metabones for this
>>2869412
g e a r t h r e a d
You sir, are dumb as fuck.
No spare flange distance, no speed booster.
Also, speed boosters make everything look terrible.
>>2869413
Yourself.
![[HorribleSubs] Mayoiga - 09 [720p].mkv_snapshot_22.37_[2016.05.28_12.52.11].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/gPFZmwu.jpg "[HorribleSubs] Mayoiga - 09 [720p].mkv_snapshot_22.37_[2016.05.28_12.52.11].jpg")
>>2869412
>>2869412
No focus to infinity. That's why.
>>2869436
>No spare flange distance, no speed booster.
this
It is the same reason we have no speed booster for Leica M lenses.
Too bad really, the .95 noctilux made brighter would be awesome.
>Also, speed boosters make everything look terrible.
other than being slightly more prone to flair, the metabones has quite good IQ and doesn't noticeably affect the lens quality.
I quite like the look of them, and because I shoot video for bands, I am usually doing shit to create more flair, fall off, ect. like Vaseline on the edges of a filter, low quality UVs, cross star filters, and so on.
>>2869412
kek
kek'd
