How do I take pictures like this? I can't figure it out. I really like the lighting. Any tips?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 1360 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2864215
Rear sync and maybe a ring flash unit?
Unsure on the ring flash
The lighting reminds me of Martin parr work tho and he used ring flashes
What is all of that?
>>2864215
it's all lighting you stupid nigger.
Umbrella on camera left, around subjects head height, aimed slightly down to cast light on the foreground. The flash has almost equaled the intensity of the sun but not quite, you can see the roof is still casting a shadow on subjects left leg, the flash can't wrap around and fill there.
Looks as though the flash is not gelled, but the WB seems a little off, maybe shot AWB, who knows
Shot at base ISO, max sync speed and narrowest aperture to expose for the sky
Framed low to make the subjects legs look out of proportion and focused on the foreground instead of the subject because why not
It looks horrendous, OP
dodge her in post
add a vignette
Lighting or not the post is fucking awful.
Maybe just overexpose a little bit and then add enormous vignetting
>>2864220
Why bother even replying when you have no fucking clue what you're talking about?
>>2864220
What on earth would suggest to you that this is rear sync???
>>2864215
There's something about this image that's off. Somebody torchered that thing in post. There was a lot done to it. About the lighting, have you looked into HDR?
>>2864215
Multiple flashes definitely used, lens probably had an ND filter, and of course gratuitous Clarity slider and saturation.
>>2864215
Why would you intentionally want to make it look like you shopped a model into a poorly composed picture?
Natural light from the right.
Lamp from the left.
Lamp from above to the right of the camera.
It's that simple.
>>2865390
Would you like to try again?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 1360 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2865392
Still choose that setup.
You just need to think more.
