span class=abbr>[EXIF data available. Click a href=javascript:void(0) onclick=toggle(

File: DSC_0177.jpg (506KB, 1000x669px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

506KB, 1000x669px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: DSC_0181.jpg (400KB, 1000x669px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

400KB, 1000x669px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: DSC_0169.jpg (395KB, 1000x669px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

395KB, 1000x669px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: DSC_0174.jpg (488KB, 1000x669px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

488KB, 1000x669px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

>>2854837
Not quite sure I get it. Is this some specialty kind of art or something? I mainly see poorly lit tables and chairs. I understand it is on film and all, which is cool, but the ability to pull of snapshots on film doesnt make the photos automatically golden.

Maybe Im missing the point here...

>>2854837

is this a new trip? old?

takes pictures like 1st day babby, but name sounds familiar.

we have way too many useless trips, we need to euthanize the shit out of them.

all garbage snapshits

File: scan_127.jpg (890KB, 1024x643px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

890KB, 1024x643px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	643

File: scan_165.jpg (488KB, 1024x685px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

488KB, 1024x685px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	685

File: scan_203.jpg (311KB, 1024x662px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

311KB, 1024x662px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	662

File: scan_234.jpg (1MB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

1MB, 1024x1024px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	1024

>>2854838
I like this one because of the colors
>>2856412
>>2856414
if you go for symmetry, you gotta nail it

>>2856412
huh. well, look at that! That'd be cool in my kitchen with colored lights, so when they mix and shadow each other, it creates all kinds of colors.

>>2856416
>white boys chasing fugly asians
this meme has to die.
OP, all these snapshits suck balls, tripfag.

Am I the only one who kinda likes these? They're nicer to look at than a lot of the shit on /p/

>>2856647
You are indeed the only person who likes these. This a photography board not a snapshit board.

>>2856647
OP samefagging his own thread.
>>2856666
checked and rekt!
OP BTFO

File: IMG_0462.jpg (677KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

677KB, 1000x750px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: IMG_0541.jpg (628KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

628KB, 1000x750px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: IMG_0466.jpg (624KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

624KB, 1000x750px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

File: IMG_0489.jpg (703KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

703KB, 1000x750px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

>>2856737
>>2856740
>>2856741
>>2856742
>what the USA will look like if Hillary wins.
Gather up your money, tripfag, you're going to pay for the wall.

>>2854838
this one is great!
the others fell short of the mark a little bit I think.

>>2857020
>red chair
>blue chair
>omg this is great
fuck you, /p/

>>2857032
Congratulations, you just got trolled.

What's up with sides of buildings? i get they're nice textured walls but who cares.

These are fucking meme photos OP.

Why not allign yourself with the wall?

>>2857676
yeah, i fucked up pretty bad with that.

>>2857083
>>2856666
>>2856515
>>2855174
>>2854865
>>2854874

thanks for the input. gonna keep taking photos everyday and read some textbooks