What do you think about this edit?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:05:15 16:39:50 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1180 Image Height 664
>>2841294
There's something awesome, impressive, unique, and exciting happening, but it's blurry in exchange for us being able to focus directly on a totally mundane hooded head with no face.
The edit is flat and bland, but who fucking cares.
>>2841297
And this one?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot Pro1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2016:05:15 12:29:06 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/3.2 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Exposure Bias 1/3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 7.19 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3254 Image Height 1527 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2841299
this one is better, seems like screenshot of the movie (the aspect ratio supports this), it gives the idea that the green-hoodie-man burned down a forest
>>2841297
>implying forest fires are awesome, impressive, unique, and exciting
>implying they dont happen every single summer and all look identical
>>2841294
is this from the Nvidia 1080 benchmarks?
>>2841294
I think you should be focusing on the event rather than your friends boring head. Also, crop the people on the hill out.
