I found a Petri PX-1 for like £2 in a secondhand store.
This is the test roll.
It's HP5 shot at 200 and developed in Xtol 1+1
Pretty fucking terrible. You were warned.
>>2835547
not sure why, but I really like this shot... unfortunately the image quality is really terrible
why are you pulling HP5? just buy an 100 speed film
Use fp4+ next time
>>2835544
lmao
>>2835541
This is a cool looking picture. The rest are v. bad.
>Petri PX-1
I stumbled across the Petri factory when I was in Japan. Way out in Saitama suburbia. Pic related.
>>2835527
not the film or developer's choice you can't develop it properly. it's not supposed to be that grainy or muddy
>>2836290
I never claimed otherwise.
It's most likely me fucking up the scanning.
Thanks for the helpful input.
>>2835815
love the colors
