I just did this. Is it good? I think i like it, but this is
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.
I just did this. Is it good?
I think i like it, but this is first time i've ever did such 'heavy' postprocessing and i feel kinda shy about that.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software darktable 1.6.9 Lens Size 18.00 - 55.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.9 Serial Number -203425520 Lens Name EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:12:30 23:30:31 Exposure Time 20 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1200 Image Height 797 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode Manual Drive Mode Unknown Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Unknown Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 288 Color Matrix 132
>>2732866
One more - imo worse and less 'minimalistic', but still in similar style.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software darktable 1.6.9 Lens Size 18.00 - 55.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.9 Serial Number -203425520 Lens Name EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:12:31 01:34:15 Exposure Time 20 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1200 Image Height 797 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode Manual Drive Mode Unknown Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Unknown Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 288 Color Matrix 132
>>2732866
garbage desu
>>2732866
this one is kinda good, lookslike overexposed flash, creative.
the other one is 100%boring shitsnap
>>2732866
>i feel kinda shy about that
Fuck the police coming straight from the underground.
Just do what feels right bb, there is no wrong in art.
>>2732867
I kinda like this one more. There's something about the perspective and background/foreground separation that makes it look like the house is a little toy prop that was held close to the lens to make it look bigger. Does anyone else feel like this?
>>2732866
this looks like taken from Sin City. i guess with a proper subject it would look cool as fuck ie. topless girl with hard nipples.
>>2732878
do you mean topless like no shirt or topless like no head
>>2732904
hello reddit.
Regardless of the postprocessing, the actual content of the photos is dull. Focus on what's in your photos before you spend so much time processing them.
Alrighty, thanks for all the feedback. I guess i'll keep liking it since answers weren't too negative.
>>2732866
It's a useful technique to have in your toolkit. Try to find a more interesting subject though