>Modern professional cameras produce images straight from the camera of such high quality that the need for adjustments in image-editing software is much less than in the past. Photographers and editors should strive to use as little post-processing as possible while adhering to our standards of image quality. All photographers should understand the limitations of their laptop screens and their working environments.
>To avoid any ambiguity, only the processes stated below may be used by the groups mentioned.
>PHOTOGRAPHERS
>Downsize photos on their longest side to 3500 pixels, when necessary.
>Do minor brightness and contrast adjustments in Levels, using only the extreme left and right sliders without clipping or removing detail from highlight and shadow areas.
>Crop, providing the crop does not remove information with journalistic value. Use the crop tool to straighten a slightly slanted horizon, but not add a tilt to an otherwise level photo or flip a picture upside down or left to right.
>Minor use of Levels and Curves to fix the color balance of a photo to its natural state.
...
>Camera Settings
>Color space must be set to Adobe RGB.
>Oh yeah, and no RAW.
Can you do it, /p/?
http://handbook.reuters.com/index.php?title=A_Brief_Guide_to_Standards,_Photoshop_and_Captions
>>2731460
why would I care to?
>>2731465
Work for Reuters? Produce photojournalistic work that doesn't skew the truth but upholds objectivity? Do great work while also upholding shit tough standards? Challenge yourself?
Could be many reasons.
calm down, it's just reuters telling people megapickels don't matter
>>2731460
>Almost 2016
>Not raping the faders
Routers can keep their bland photos.
>Downsize photos on their longest side to 3500 pixels, when necessary.
A7s sensor GOTYAY?
>>2731533
now guess what's hot again!
>>2731540
'The best large format camera of all time.'
-Ken Rockwell
>>2731460
>implying photojournalism is the same photography
>implying that photography as an art and photojournalism aren't entirely different things
2/10 made me reply
>>2731566
>photography as an art
top fucking pleb
i bet youd vote for sanders dumb ass if you were old enough to vote
4chan is 18+ btw
>>2731568
those are some fucking hot opinions right there
>>2731568
ebin meme m8
>>2731624
your fucking candidate is a meme m8
>>2731544
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2009:12:20 21:45:38 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1280 Image Height 903
>>2731460
>>Crop, providing the crop does not remove information with journalistic value.
So they would rather abolish framing an sich, and have everyone submit spherical panorama's?
>>2731896
You're joking, but for journalistic storytelling, having the entire scene would be massively beneficial. Journalism is about spreading stories, not about making art. The details of what's happening off camera can dramatically influence the interpretation of what's happening in the frame.
>>2731896
The Reuters photographers (and got bless them for being just about the only ones who still bother) aren't gonna start submitting panoramas, they're just required to not cut out something like, say, an absolute madman in a keffiyeh, and only keep the soldier and scattered civilians in the frame. You can completely change the meaning of an image by cropping it.
>>2731932
This isn't the pic related I was looking for, there's a great one that I see on conspiracy sites that's pretty much the same thing, but it gets the point across.
>>2731472
>reuters
>journalistic integrity
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpcm Vertical Resolution 240 dpcm Image Created 2015:12:30 08:14:21
