How has this photo been post-processed? I really like the washed out colors, and I'd like to replicate it on some of my own work. Thanks
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D800 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 906 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1600 Image Height 1068 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:09 13:31:30 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/10.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 801 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2702302
bump
>>2702302
curves
>>2702315
who would have guessed
>>2702302
these are some disgusting lightroom mustard yellows (TM)
i sure hope you guys dont do this
>>2702302
Pick this point up at curve tab in your converter
>>2702316
Washed out = low contrast, lighter blacks
color balance = difference between R, G, and B channel
So, remove contrast/raise black, and play with the RGB channels until you have the balance you want.
>>2702320
Ok that's actually useful, thanks
>>2702323
Generally, if someone says "curves", and you think "that doesn't help me at all", you didn't understand curves (and possibly digital image files/histograms) enough. Read up on documentation, google tutorials, and experiment A LOT with curves, and exposure/color balance (while looking at how the histogram and the image change).
>>2702302
reduce vibrancy and contrast.
white balance to 4000K
Looks like mainly vibrance reduction and, a little bit of shadow/highlight recovery to me
>>2702302
Yes, it has. The contrast has been lowered dramatically. There isn't a LOT of processing, so with the right scene, you could get away with making a camera profile with the contrast turned all the way down, and getting close straight OOC.
>>2702328
>>2702773
Color saturation and virbancy decreases when contrast decreases.
>>2702933
this dude is right, looks fucking horrible though desu senpai
those are some big ass bananas
it's simply a layer of cross-processed film at about 70-80% transparency over the original, which has had its contrast increased but its saturation decreased to taste
it's important you keep your secondary color wheel in mind when choosing the saturation/type of your cross-processed effect so it combines over the original colors to increase vibrancy/color character the way you want (i.e. you might want to make your greens yellowish in the cross processing so they become bluer when layered with the original green, etc).
>>2702302
Is that a 3rd world Oscar Meyer Weiner machine?
>>2702975
>Weiner
Why is this so hard for your people?
>>2702977
Our "i before e" rule is fucked, and actually incorrect more often than not.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 650 Image Height 466
>>2702982
but "wiener" isn't an English word.
Why are you applying your moronic rules to it?
>>2702985
Because we all think that it is, and if we can't even learn OUR rules, why would we know German rules?
