JESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICAJESSICA
I've got a UA running shirt and a Nike dri-fit running shirt.
The UA shirt seems to acquire and retain stains much more easily than the Nike. It also started to pill up where it rubs against backpack straps much earlier than the Nike.
When is this balding cunt gonna die already? He pretends to be an outdoorsman yet he doesnt do shit and he contributes to the nutnfancy groupthink of "big knives r gud durrr"
Who is this faggot?
>>761444
probably some celebrity of youtuber that /in/ spergs and children worship
Muh knives
>>761444
Oh lord trips you really shouldn't look him up he's super annoying and just a mall ninja
>>761481
> super annoying and just a mall ninja
That's pretty much a spot on description.
All of his vids are shot in a little clump of trees behind his house.
>>761562
the other day i was compelled to see nutnfancys first videos. hilariously it was exactly what i expected. they start augmenting their image with filler 'bushcraft' videos to make themselves look viable as knife sellers
>>761563
I remember him answering the comments as his sister or something. It was just cringeworthy.
>>761563
at least nutn goes outside, pm101 just goes behind his house, collects money from gearwhoring and gets to design 2 different knives AND get's to choose the name for them
>>761593
No m8, nothing justifies the existence of nutnfancy's channel or videos or anything. He is just appealing to the lower iq segments of the population with his lunatic and self centered view of the world. He is just a stereotype feeding the 'murica meme
He has a closet-gay face
>>761151
Yeah I've seen this guy before, he has a hard on for big knives so I didn't bother to watch many of his video's, he comes across as awkward and very creepy, he has dead eyes which I also hate, that was one of the reasons I didn't watch much of his stuff, his eye's creeped me out too much!!
>>761151
how can this fag have 150k subs? I honestly don't get how backyard warriors like he, that austrian dyke and a few more youtubers get so much attention? Is the gear/prepper community that retarded?
That's a rhetoric question btw.
he did design a great knife, though.
Hate him all you like, the jx2 is nothing short of amazing.
It made me LOL when he picked his jessica-x as his "go to" survival knife - that thing is seriously cringeworthy, but the jessmuk, expensive as it is, is great.
He is mostly a gear guy, and his channel is knives and torches, but he did make the gauntlet with some more bushcrafty guys, and he's nowhere near as bad as nutn.
>>762300
>he did design
>he
>designed
buddy thats a nessmuk pattern butcher knife, he barely changed anything and had LT use modern materials that's it, he didn't design shit.
Also why does this cunt have 150k subs and growing but im stuck at 38 subs despite actually going outside and not gear obssesing.
>>762398
>salty ignorant comment
Cry more. Maybe if you made good videos, you'd have more subs? Have you considered that possibility?
Second - no, the jx2 is not "just" a nessmuk style. The devil, as they say, is in the details, and it's obvious you've never used it, or you'd change your mind in about three seconds.
Sure - Chris did draw upon several other designs in this, namely the ulu, mora bushcraft black, and canadian belt knife, but I haven't seen anyone else bring those knives together into a single design.
It's obvious from your post, that you're just salty, and have no real understanding of the subject.
>>762403
>It's almost like he copied a nessmuk pattern knife and renamed it
>>762429
The dude may be a tool, but those two knives have different profiles. The overall outline may be similarish, but seriously they arent the same.
>>762445
They are way too similar to be calling it a new design
>>762445
Yeah, for some reason he put a saber/scandi grind on what is essentially a skinning/dressing knife.
>>762445
Holy shit oh my god! How could i have missed a different grind, handle and different thickness now i see these two look nothing alike, how could i have been so ignorant?
>>762472
sarcasm aside, you are ignorant. While it's impossible to make a knife that doesn't resemble any other knife, the two that you posted in >>762429 ARE very different indeed.
you could have posted a cbk alongside them as well - the jx2 as a whole, is a different animal than either one.
Going by that logic, the Gary Wines Bushcrafter "designed" by Gary Wines, is basically a copy of a french trade knife.
Same with esee's camp lore series, etc.
Stay ignorant if you wish.
>>762472
those are all major properties. the nessmuks only real claim to fame was its profound belly on an excellent skinning knife.
there are a lot of things to expand on with knife design to make it either situationally viably or personally viable. for example the canadian army knife has no lip, and ive seen many customizations on it to provide that lip for safe use. dave canterbury openly bases his pathfinder scouts on french butcher knives, with modifications for relevance
stop being such a legacy whore. its obviously still a nessmuk, its also obviously a spin on the nessmuk. the spin allows enough variation to quantify it under a different name, and the proprietor saw fit to use his own name to denote those quantities
for the recor, the major difference between the jx2 and the nessmuk (and most other knives) is the angle change between the handle and the blade (ie, the belly dropping down), that has a serious (and very positive) impact on ergonomics.
On a purely skinning knife, when you mostly use the belly, that part is less relevant, but for an all-round bushcraft knife it makes a difference.
Also the handle, which is nothing short of amazing - unlike those supposedly ergonomic, heavily profiled handles, that are meant for a single grip, I have not yet found a way to hold the jessmuk that would be uncomfortable (I suppose I could grab it by the blade and cut myself, but that's about it).
And Chris never denied copying a number of features onto the knife from other places - it's the way they all come together that makes it a "design" process.
The only real way you can "see" the difference is to try it yourself, which is not easily done with a 230 dollar knife, or to take the word of someone who has.
>>762509
>which is not easily done with a 230 dollar knife
Why that price? I understand that you are happy with the design because it fits your needs or whatever, but they don't justify that price. Can you order a custom steel or handle or something? I don't know the guy but let's face it, he is not Ray Mears.
>>762520
yea, the knife market is madly inflated. i get hand forging requires manhours that need to be compensated, but manufactured knives selling for upwards 100 usd is hilarious. i dont care how much proprietary process you use, that value is artificial
>buying a knife with a retarded mallninja youtuber's logo on it
Nah thanks. Also that guy is unemployed, can pretty much be him shilling here for himself.
>>762403
You have a mancrush with the faggot we get it. Are you going to show him screencaps of how you stood up for him on 4chinz? Only that would justify spending more than 20 dollars in something promoted by a youtuber.
>>762520
There's more to a price than just the cost of materials. Hype does certainly add to it, as does the extra work required for a fancier design, than a simple one.
Unless you'd like your knives to be made by minimum-wage factory workers in china, a small, independent, knifemaker who cannot use the economy of scale will always be more expensive than production knives - that's just life.
>>762522
afaik it's an amalgamation of several knives - it does resemble a nessmuk, once all is said and done, hence the name that acknowledges the fact.
I still don't get all the hate for it - It's a great knife, with a unique name that identifies it precisely, and pm101 never claimed it was his own, completely original idea for a knife.
>>762525
the logo isn't bad, and it's nowhere near the bear grylls brand on a gerber - you stil get a great knife all in all.
There's no point in shilling a $230 - if you can't afford it, telling you to buy one is entirely pointless, and if you can afford a high end knife, you can very well do your own research and get one that appeals to you.
>>762529
kek
No.
Still doesn't change the fact that one of the best designed knives of the last decade or two came to be because of a youtube celebrity, rather than someone with the proper pedigree.
Is that why you're so salty?
>>762538
>I still don't get all the hate for it - It's a great knife
Agreed, I like the design, the hate comes from it's origin and price.
>>762541
Eh? the design is hardly unique
>>762541
>Still doesn't change the fact that one of the best designed knives of the last decade or two
Wew, Chris Tanner pls.
>>762541
>Still doesn't change the fact that one of the best designed knives of the last decade or two
We are not talking about a gladius or a bowie m8, hold your horses.
>>762541
what knife are you talking about
>>762522
Changing important elements of a design is considered redesigning. How dense are you.
>>762547
Not chris, but I'll stand behind the jx2 of my own volition.
>>762559
name another then.
I agree, that at the end of the day, it's just a knife - it isn't magic or anything, and Chris being a youtuber is not exactly a great resume when you think about a knife designer, but he hit tha nail on the head with this one.
AND being a youtuber, he was in a position to make it happen. Sure, you can make fun of the fact, but the knife defends itself.
That's what I find hilarious - people jump on the fact that it came from a youtube celebrity (of sorts), instead of judging the knife for what it is.
Hell yes it's expensive - pushing $280 depending on the handle options, but again - it is what it is. Diminishing returns and all that, it ticks all the right boxes for a 230 dollar knife.
Might not be your cup of tea - so what?
>>762564
I said he DID redesign it i'm not denying he just redesigned it but an anon said he "designed" it so that would mean he basically made the whole shape himself, which he didn't, he remade a nessmuk pattern. Just tell me what bothers you about my analogy and i'll make sure to completely explain what i meant and/or retract my argument
>>762577
Well you are the one that placed us in the position to remind you that it is not an original design, that the redesigner has no credentials about creating knifes, and that the knife has to stand the test of time m8. You are not doing this guy any favor by defending his work the way you are doing it here.
>>762588
ok, "he redesigned a number of knives into a final shape that somewhat resembles a nessmuk, that is head and shoulders above every other rendition of nessmuk, ever"
How's that sound?
You're the ones getting butthurt over the fact that what he put together - ie, designed, is somewhat similar to a nessmuk-type skinning knife.
Do yourself a favour, and actually use the damn knife instead of talking shit about it based on pictures from the internet, and the fact that you dislike the guy who put his name on it.
or don't, and keep insisting on some stupid technicality.
>>762577
You get that you're one of his retarded type followers, but you liking the knife does not make it one of the best designed knives in the last decades. But just like any other knife that someone buys and likes, you'll defend your lady's honor. Nothing wrong with that, just makes you look like a tool. Next time at least use a namefag so people can sage your shit.
>>762584
Redesign.
It is a noun/verb.
It means that you design something over again in a different way.
Meaning, yes, he designed his knife.
>>762647
Right, but he didn't CREATE the knife shape, he did "design" it, but he didn't think of the shape by himself, he took inspiration from other knives, a lot of inspiration
>>762673
Who cares? Every designer everywhere takes inspiration from something or other. Being mad that he was inspired by something is ridiculous.
>>762647
If design and redesign are the same thing why would you need another word for it? You are just playing dumb. He didn't design it. He took an existing design and changed a couple things that's all. Michellin didn't invent the wheel and they don't claim they did, they just say that their tires are the best that's all. That's way more honest.
>>762679
Redesigningis literally the act of designing something again
>>762541
>more 0.5$ were deposited in your account
Thanks for your service.
>>762624
that's where you're wrong, and that's why it's hillarious.
It wouldn't be so funny if the jessmuk was a bad, or even mediocre, but that's just it - it's one of the best designs in the last couple of decades, nevermind where it came from.
>>762679
and Tanner never claimed that it was unique - the way he said it - he took the blade from a bladetech ulu, handle from a mora bushcraft black, some general idea from a canadian belt knife, added thumb scallops as suggested by one of the reviewers from the gauntlet, and since the final product somewhat resembles a nessmuk style knife, he called it jessmuk.
What's dishonest about that?
>>762688
Again, i'm not arguing against him, i'm arguing against the anon that said he DESIGNED the whole thing himself, which he didn't.
>>762688
design for?
>>762695
if you mean >>762300, that was my post.
Yeah - i did say he designed it, I never said that he did so from scratch, without taking inspiration from other sources, or that it was 100% original.
You (assuming >>762398 is you) said he just copied a nessmuk design.
>>762695
general bushcraft knife.
Really - it comes down to a few simple facts, most notably the handle design, which is extremely comfortable, a bit longer than typical knife handles, and the blade.
The way it's put together has great ergonomics - Like I said - I have not yet found a way to hold the jessmuk that would be uncomfortable - hammer grip, saber grip (and with the longer handle, you don't have to put your thumb on the blade), upside down, chest pull grip. Every review that's out there says the same thing, it's extremely comfortable to hold in every possible way, and the belly is great for slicing.
Again - that's not rocket science - curved swords slicing well isn't exactly a revelation.
From experience I can tell you, that because of the portion that is closest to the handle, you don't have to cock your wrist when cutting (most people didn't anyway, they cock the blade instead, and that changes how the force vector is applied - there's a science behind it that i'm pretty sure pm101 wasn't aware of at the time).
>>762714
from experience i can tell you the best bushcraft knife is a chisel knife. the nessmuk is a skinner
>>762740
and the jessmuk has a scandi grind. And yes - it works for skinning, and works very well for bushcraft - making all kinds of notches, bowdrills, feathersticks etc.
>>762752
thanks for naming all the meme knife uses born from knife reviewers on youtube. 9/10 for not including batoning
>>762752
>it works for skinning, and works very well for bushcraft - making all kinds of notches, bowdrills, feathersticks etc.
Proove it
>>762752
So it does it all. The guy designed (tm) the perfect knife. Besides a youtube celebrity, the guy's a genius. Thousends of years of trial an error and we would have still be in the same path if it wasn't for the birth of Chris.
>>762837
literally what the fuck are you talking about
>>761593
Sounds like a good deal to me. Shame I don't have a clump of trees behind my house
>>763176
of course it's a great deal so long as you like being fake as fuck, hell i'd pretend to be john rambo on yt to make shittons of money for doing nothing
>>761151
combover fag should get a haricut desu
>>761444
>Who is this faggot?
>balding cunt
>pretends to be an outdoorsman
>doesnt do shit
>celebrity youtuber that /in/ spergs and children worship
>Muh knives
>super annoying
>just a mall ninja
>vids are shot in a little clump of trees behind his house
>gearwhore
>closet-gay face
>awkward
>very creepy
>has dead eyes
>copied existing knife design
>didn't design shit
>dat comb over
ok... got it
He looks like a generic gay porn star
>>765001
kek he really does
>>764197
Hit the nail on the head.
Fucking youtube gearwhores.
>>767201
that's true half of the youtube "outdoors" community is just gearwhore shills
>>767295
Yeah its a shame really
>>767295
Don't know man. I think it's ok if a youtuber that usually uploads quality content does a review of someone else's gear or their own, as long as uploading content remains the primary goal of their channels.
I was subbed to Lilly's channel for instance, until she started making videos reccomending stuff that she didn't even tried before and supporting things like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAooStKlo8Q
>>767372
i don't mind her or any youtuber shouting out a decent channel, but when they promote channels with no educational content, or they shill crap then that's a big red flag and a turn off (case and point, Joe Robinet ruined himself in my eyes when he made the "what is bushcraft" and the fjallraven video, the fjallraven one mainly because a. he's not being paid/sponsored b. because he talks like a damn infomercial telemarketer)
EVERYONE BOW DOWN TO NUTNFANCY, OUR TRUE OUTDOORS SAVIOUR
AAAWWHHUUUUUU
>>767372
JFC she is shamelessly reviewing her tats? Damn what is she going to do next to gain some attention
>>762757
>meme uses
kok tep m8 what's not a "meme use" then? goes to show 4chin is just a bunch of hipsters that, whenever there's something good you call it a meme
>>768192
because dudes notice it and she realizes she'll get more views for it
>>768192
Sooner or later she'll find an excuse to get into her underwear like Lilly just did at 1:45 of her "fishing in Sweden" video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPvvnJ7pnd4
>>769084
cutting paper and brandishing at your girlfriends boyfriend
>>769149
She has at least 3 vids where she takes her clothes off. What a hit whore. I'd gladly give her the D tho.
>>769373
where does Stephi take her clothes off? Or are you talking about Lilly? Either way Lilly has a great body but a horrible butterface and an annoying voice
>>769377
you one of them faggots? girls with austrian accents are a delicacy
>>769377
Yeah I was talking about Lilly. But in that vid with the tattoos stephi shows everything but her peepee weewee.
>>765001
or pic related
>>769149
>don't see anything but some leg
You got me all excited for nothing, anon.
>>761441
At least nutn actually camps. Prob does a lot more shit than the avg /out/ fag here.
>>769817
You have a point there. I dislike nutn because of his tinfoil tier shit, but he gets a pack with a fuckton of unnecesary shit, and actually goes /out/ even in winter and with his doggo. That saves him in my book.
>>769969
Yes. Everyone in this thread agrees. He is a douche. But he goes out.
>>769971
He does that's the only reason people have respect for him, because he's not like pm101, everydaytacticalvids etc
