>>666147
its a knife, does it cut stuff?
do you think it was worth your money?

if yes to both, then you made a good purchase, all you'll get here is opinion and a shitload of pics of other knives you'll wish you had.

>>666147
Looks like a Crater with metal on the handle. I like my Crater.

>did i fuck up?
You didn't get the serrated one did you?

>>666147
Go use it and find out.

>>666147

No, Leatherman is not the first place where a knife enthusiast would stop for folding knives, but they make very decent stuff.

You can bet it's not top notch but it's also acceptable, and looks good I think.

Also dont let anyone tell you their 300$ Medford of Fagbenza is any better than a 2$ knife if both cut and do the job. And this is coming from an avid knife collector

>>666325
>You can bet it's not top notch
If you want an inexpensive EDC you won't mind too much if you lose it, I think Leatherman is one of the better choices.

>>666147
eh.... Its one of the better leatherman knives(all their modern craters use shit steel) but its still pretty avg. overall.

Id have paid a bit more for a spyderco to be honest, but in my area the price differences arnt too big(The cheaper craters are around $20, the e33 would prob. be $60, a spyderco firefly is around $70)

No serrations on blade, so it's not trash.

Looks like a usable blade to me.

>>666395

I'd go for Cold Steel , Ka-Bar or Ontario, but yeah I guess