I knew Camaro owners were retarded, but I didnt know they were stupid enough to pay $40k for a v6 muscle car
>>15439695
Askin ain't gettin.
/thread
blah blah blah
>>15439730
>40k for a chevy "sports car" with 280lb/ft of torque
vid related
https://youtu.be/NKGrE-CoFUs?t=25s
The v6 actually sounds somewhat decent too
>>15439790
why not compare it vs a base ecoboost?
and those results aren't one sided really
mustang wins in 1/4 mile and 0-100 and camaro wins in some areas too, but its really close
so essentially you can get the same performance, better in some scenarios for 4k cheaper with a mustang
nice one chevyshits
>>15439849
Read the image title, practically the same car.
Also look at the base price, once gain practically the same.
I dont understand why you are shitting on chevy when ford does the same shit with a turbo i4.
>>15439866
the point is the price
ecoboost can be had for 26k but the v6 chevy can't
>>15439790
>>15439755
the camaro in the op is turbo'd
>>15439888
Its 28k for a base v6, omg 2k is gonna brake the bank
Also who pays msrp for a car
In the end they are practically the same car with practically the same price tag, find something better to complain about
Also anybody who buys a "muscle car" without a v8 is a cuck
>>15439924
The listing is incorrect. Check the dealer pictures of the engine compartment to check for yourself. Not a turbo to be found
>>15439970
>check the dealer pics
>no link
.....
>>15439790
They're as fast as a V6 Honda Accord lol.
>>15440012
>he can't read
look at the OP pic again
>>15440054
>wanting me to manually type the name of the site into the url bar and search for this fucking car when you can just post a link
How about eat a penis?
>>15440065
go fuck yourself
>>15439695
>turbocharged
>>15440065
>spoon-feed me plz
>>15439695
>Turbo AND a V6
Is this a new car? I'm 90% certain there wouldn't be a turbo for the V6, even as a dealer option.
>>15440217
its not turbo
wrong listing
>>15440024
Precisely why anybody who buys one of these is a cuck
