/o/ census
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
Form:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/180F6YdnszJd0i1uH6-o29yRhKfrL4RwPXAlQ36kFbuU/viewform?usp=send_form
Results:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/180F6YdnszJd0i1uH6-o29yRhKfrL4RwPXAlQ36kFbuU/viewanalytics
>>15391822
>datamining
don't think so faggot
>>15391831
One in every thread.
Yearly income needs to be optional or have a "fuck you" option. Pretty sure there aren't 28 people on here making $1M+ a year.
>>15391954
You have to expect the typical troll responses. There's not much that can be done to prevent them.
>>15391985
>imblying there's 18 females on this board
>>15392756
>>15391954
shit man i remember assembling this collage after the op went awol
ironically it was the worst year of my life
>>15394479
I didn't come here to feel.
But I left here feeling.
>>15394406
You and I both.
Boomp.
Zoomp.
>
>>15391954
Fuck you option added.
>>15397848
Hooray.
>>15396054
4chan keeps me sane, anon. I enjoyed assembling the collage. /o/ is one huge family.
>>15400381
truth
>>15400381
>>15400849
>>>/z/ ?
>how would you improve /o/?
>ban all anons and bus riders
Must be GS400GOY
>those eight other Trabant bros
>that one other Hooniverse bro
>them bros that answered WAT in the racing division and tuner
>>15400987
kek
>have only sucked two dicks
;_;
>>15401528
Three dick sucker here. Feels good.
>/o/ is 98.5% male
Surprised it's more than 1% female, honestly.
>>15401528
You can suck mine if you want.
>>15402310
>>>/trash/3887588
>>15402310
I thought r9k only liked girls.
>
>>15401528
Does my own dick count?
>>15403114
Quite the philosophical quandary.
>>15403114
Is it a dick? Have you sucked it?
Spit or swallow?
>>15391822
So aparently we're all 18-20 somethings with no money who drive modded 90's shitboxes...
I LIKE IT
>>15404410
>the amount of people who say they're cute
/o/ bf here I come
>>15391822
>viewanalytics
pie charts are shit
>>15404410
The amount of people who claim to be exactly 18 is somewhat suspicious I detect 16-17 year olds trying to avoid the
>underage b&
Comment.
>>15404410
Wasn't that obvious before?
>
Page 10 bump.
>
>>15404609
Dunning-Kruger effect, but for aesthetics, I'd imagine.
So a bunch of uggos either facetiously, or genuinely claiming to be gods of beauty.
