Is the CTS-V Coupe a bad car?
- Home
- Board: /o/ - Auto
- Reading: Is the CTS-V Coupe a bad car?
Is the CTS-V Coupe a bad car?
Sure, why not?
Are you a pad person?
>>15376449
wagon > poop
>>15376466
>wagon
>above anything
>>15376459
I'm more of a caliper man myself
no its probably the best American car but a car that big should be a sedan
but for the ctsv its wagon>sedan>coupe
>>15376495
>a car that big should be a sedan
Bruh.
>>15376484
But he's right.
>>15376503
Holy fucking shit. Bring that car to Europe, try to turn it, and watch as Earthquakes tear apart the entire fucking continent.
>>15376503
>that 10 foot long trunk
I wonder how many bodies can fit in there
>>15376449
Yes. But only because it's ugly. The wagon looks infinitely better.
Sort of on topic but what about a 03 3.5 maxima gle? They look slick as fuck to me and comfy too, considering buying a mint one for 3-5k
>>15376595
Get it in manuel
>>15376595
02-03 have the 3.5. 00-01 have the 3.0
>>15376518
looks like a hearse
>>15376595
Once you get past the inevitable 100k~120k alternator, radiator failure and vacuum leak, they're fine
150k on mine.. it's an okay car
the 3.0 is not fast though.
The 3.5 burns some oil
the 3.0 leaks a tiny bit right where the trans connects to the motor
so minor its not worth fixing.
Also she drinks coolant if you thrash it
>>15376595
Had an 03 to ~250k, but by that point many a pony had run astray (to the point that it was slower than my 99 with 150k). Burned oil, too. Might have been fixable with some work but at that point the frame was rusted out around the engine mounts (northeast winters and salt) so it wasn't worth it.
Pretty sure the 3.0 will last longer than anything else on the car around it.
>>15379662
Yeah you'll need one too after it drags your piece of shit miata down the track.
