How did modern M cars go so bad so quickly?
>>15369579
poor engineering
what's so bad about them?
the steering is a little bit number than the hydraulic power steering on the older models and the new M4 sounds disappointing.
The M4 GTS and M2 is amazing
Because the future needs ayr to be diffused in many different ways. God wills it.
>>15369584
>526hp vs 365hp
a tuned m2 still walks the shelby kek
>>15369584
>M2
0/8
In today's car design language, even an ass must be angry.
Fits better to the whole constipation face theme.
>>15369579
They got rid of the dipstick.
>>15369664
drivers of other brands still have one
>>15369666
Devilish.
>>15369584
How is this relevant??
They have widely different horsepower.
I don't even like the ultimate leasing machine but this is a dumb comparison.
>>15369672
hello newfriend
>>15369579
>How did modern M cars go so bad so quickly?
Change for change's sake.
They made a couple of nearly perfect cars. At that point, they should have stopped changing anything save for the bare minimum necessary to keep up with regulations.
You can't do that, though. You have to keep selling ALL-NEW!!! every year. The problem is, if you are changing something that is perfect then, by definition, you can only possibly make that thing worse.
>>15369579
In a side note
Why the hell is there a M(Everynumber)
There's a M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6
Why?
What's the difference between all of these
>>15369743
To persuade you to buy new instead of used. M4 has to be better than M3, right?
>how can BM compete?
>>15369579
They've been getting fatter and more 'luxury' focused since their inception.
>>15369579
Reminder.
