Let's post cars that we used to own and shouldn't have gotten rid of.
This was my '95 Mustang GT-S.
A sort of rare stripped down version of the GT.
Only 300 and something were made in this color.
Only had 68k miles.
I hated it because it was an automatic and I was 18.
I traded it for a S14 with a shotty RB25 swap that gave me hell until I broke down and sold it.
>>15341558
I like my current car way better, but still wish I had hing on to this for longer than I did. The 5.0 purred like a kitten.
>>15341571
>>15341577
Here's the shitpile S14 I mentioned
>>15341558
I've had:
79 WS6 Trans Am 4spd
79 Hurst/ Olds
84 Buick GN w/ moonroof option
91 5.0 hatch 5spd LX
69 Roadrunner 383 4spd
70 Roadrunner 383 4spd
89 F250 XL reg cab 6.9l IDI
The only one I miss is the f250.
>>15341558
>5.0 Mustang
nothing of value was lost. It's not a 4.6.
>>15341657
>All of that American steel
>>15341682
Confirmed for being retarded or bait. Everyone knows the 4.6 gt from that body style is the worst
>>15342169
but makes the most power.
>>15341682
>It's not a 4.6.
Uhhh, most people I know would prefer the 5.0.
Far more mod-ability. HUGE aftermarket and more reliable. Besides, stock for stock they made the same torque in the models years after '95.
>>15342188
No....
1996/1997 mustang GT : 215 HP/285 tq.... same as 5.0....
Given the two engines, a knowledgeable person would pick the 5.0 during those days.
>>15341558
You mean the poor man's mustang
>>15341558
>Rare
If you had any self respect you'd be rarely seen in it
Don't sweat it man it was an automatic
>>15341558
>only 300 made in this color
There are actually people who nitpick about what shade of grey their 20 y/o ride is painted?
this thread is full of fail.
anyone who knows shit about shit knows the 5.0L is far superior. the 4.6L isn't worth a fuck unless it has 4 cans and 32 valves.
traded it in for a fucking ford focus
I miss my 96' Saab hatchback.
