Why rich rednecks can't into aerodynamics?
>>15220665
do you think cars going over 300mph don't have aerodynamic thought put into them?
>>15220665
>Low front end
>Little to no square edges
>Large spoiler to add downforce over rear axle
Pretty sure that's some pretty advanced aero given the regulations. Too bad abusive aero F1 died in 2008.
>>15220692
>>Low front end
>>Little to no square edges
>>Large spoiler to add downforce over rear axle
literally 1980's tier
>>15220764
>Based 1980's F1 aero
>>15220764
lol fuck aero, give it a turbo and well get 1200 bhp
what could go wrong?
>>15220665
Aerodynamics are the reason why cars looks like shit so no thanks
>>15222449
>>15222034
make sure that wing is only partially secured johnny!!
>>15222452
Why are you proving his point?
>>15222449
This is incorrect. They look bad because of crash safety. We can't have '80s wedges because they aren't safe in a crash. Many '80s cars were more aerodynamic then now.
>>15222875
no it's depend on the car mostly an audi A2 is way more aerodynamic than a coutach for exemple
Literally a dart with an engine and down force
>>15222913
>>15222907
think about it, what cuts through the air better, a triangular wedge or a soap bar shaped blob
>>15222923
A teardrop is the most aerodynamic shape so depending on the shape of the blob, the blob
>>15222928
Supposedly funny cars could be faster because nitro engines pull harder with more drag/down force, but they make sure the flagship class is faster by less weight restriction.
>>15222923
the round blob
>>15222034
Too bad it'll never return.
