Can you honestly get more baller than this
The future is now niggas
>2l 4cyl turbo standard for 50k
>265hp
Yea it weighs an ass ton, which is why it also comes with a 3.7l v8 with 335 hp
I think I found a luxury car I like
>>15188657
>gigantic sedan
>those engine options
Its like living in a world where only the s350 and s400 are sold
>>15188670
there was a s250 option
>4 cylinder diesel
>>15188657
>3.7 V8
>335 HP
Lol what? My Genesis makes 333 HP with a v6 of equal displacement. And the v6 options for the Nissan Altima, Toyota Camry, Honda Accord make more power than that 2.0T.
>but anon, those are FWD cars
Yes, I know. But still.
>>15188657
Sorry its a 3.6l v6
I thought was kind of lofmw tier for a v8
>>15188689
Yea my b, it's a v6
>>15188670
>300hp V8
>3700lbs
woefully underpowered desu
>>15188657
shitbox, waste of money, junk cars, embarrassment to american makes, buy a fucking truck and call it a day or get the genesis coupe if you want a decent looking rwd with some power
>>15188724
Yea but baller status nigga
>american cars without v8's
why even bother
>>15188657
>3.7l v8 with 335 hp
kekworthy
>>15188770
V6 I misread
>>15188657
They change up the logo on the Chrysler 300?
>>15188670
yfw it's lighter than a gt-r
I just don't like the look of the CT6. Way too contemporary and over-designed aesthetically for the kind of car it is (a 'traditional' full size luxury sedan). Even the side profile looks really 'off'. That aggressive, sporty, edgy design language works great on the CTS and ATS, but really looks like shit on a full-size boat.
The new Lincoln Continental seems to go too far in the other direction: it's just too plain looking. But maybe that's because pictures don't convey its size.
>>15188715
Kk
>2016
>setting out b8
>America's top luxury offering
>no V8
>no V10
>no V12
>still trying to convince buyers with low prices instead of high quality
It's the 80s all over again.
>>15188657
>Still can't compete with REAL luxury brands
>>15190405
>no v8
Both the CTS V Sport, ATS V and CT6 have twin turbo v6 and the CTS V has a supercharged v8
>low price, low quality
Cadillac's current market strategy is high price, high quality
>>15190448
>BMW
>Luxury
>>15190405
Do you string random words together hoping they make sense?
but its so ugly
Id just get a 5 series
>>15188657
This tho
>>15190662
Higher luxury than acura and cadillac no question
but bmws business model front the start was for their sedans to always to be cheaper and more driver oriented than mercedes and audi.
>>15188657
The CT6 is supposed to come with a 2l I4 turbo 3.6 v6 twin turbo and 4.4l v8 twin turbo not 3.7l
>>15189300
look at it from the side, that's some presidential shit
http://jalopnik.com/there-wont-be-a-cadillac-ct6-v-but-it-will-get-a-twin-t-1754531611
twin turbo V8.
>>15190736
The CT6 has GM's new 3.0 twin turbo v6 not the LF3 in the CTS and XTS V Sport.
>>15190693
twincharged my nigga
>>15190662
>cadillac doesn't even make a full-size luxury car
>>15190448
>escalade
>inferior to rx
now if you put an xts/elr and a gs/ls/ct then it would be more accurate
>>15189300
>well golly, that Audi looks good. Lets try to make one
>>15188657
gta 5 already did it
>>15188670
S350 is fuel efficient though
>>15188657
I think you mean V6
There's going to be a twin turbo V8
>>15190958
>That awkward stiff stance
>That awkward smile
>35 years old wearing a ninja turtles shirt
>maintaining a distance from your woman
This is painful to look at.
>>15190448
>lexus
>>15188657
It looks like it's crying.
>>15188657
The 2013 looks a lot better. Still had the wreath and none of the funny headlight looking thing
>>15191161
>>15191104
>>15188657
>>15188657
> baller
> niggas
are you actually black or just pretending to be?
>>15191041
Hopefully it's just camera shyness.
I quite like the route Cadillac is taking, with upgraded quality and styling and most other companies are using smaller displacement engines as well. Granted the competitors of the Ct6 still offer big and powerful engines which is reasonable because someone buying a full size luxury sedan shouldn't be concerned with fuel economy if they're paying 80k+
>>15191368
Rich people do care about fuel economy, they don't want to be going to a gas station twice a week, especially when it's winter
>>15191375
I meant more on the cost
>>15190448
>Lexus
>Luxury
cadillac was always on top i think except from 00 to 05, they made only 3 horrible cars during their 100 years of existence, i was olways a fan and i cant wait to drive caddy ats in my euro shithole, but they need to return to their roots and produce a badass cruiser with v8, sexy design, reliability and so on like the old cadillac models, I'm so mad that they canceled ciel I thin it would sell like cupcakes and it would be a proper cadillac.
>>15191595
>>15191061
Welcome to the millennium.
we cadillac dump nao?
>>15191917
It looks like a braun electric shaver
>>15188657
3,600 pounds is light as fuck for a full size luxury car. The German equivalents are 2000 pounds more.
![2017-Tesla-Model-S[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/1hFox0r.jpg "2017-Tesla-Model-S[1].jpg")
>Can you honestly get more baller than this
Yeah.
>>15188657
>2l 4cyl turbo
>Luxury
what the fuck cadillac
>>15188657
Is it the Mercedes CLA engine? suspiciously the same hp rating from the same engine configuration.
>>15191226
>just camera shyness
>wife's son
don't make excuses for this m8
>>15195819
I know, right? It would be so much better as an EV to be a competitor to the Model S.
>>15196861
There is an electric version of the CT6 that's going to be made in China. Though I doubt too many will end up being imported into the US.
>>15196915
>>15196918
>>15195819
>>15196861
They are making a twin turbo V8 option and an EV option. it will pretty much cover everyone's needs regarding engines. something tells me if it was V8-only that would be a bigger turn-off than 4-cylinder-only. (this way in places with displacement tax it doesn't heavily inflate the price)
People think the idea of an semi-auto viper is blasphemy but that would probably be the thing to boost sales. (appealing to normies who might buy 4 cylinder BMW's and think their badass/upper class)
Just my theory though. Cadillac does have the same marketing guy who turned people's view of Audi around after losing so many sales to BMW (he also turned infinity around aswell) he most likely knows what hes doing. (i hope he can pull one off for Cadillac)
>>15196924
>>15196942
>>15196946
>>15191711
>they made only 3 horrible cars during their 100 years of existence
what is
>cimarron
>entirety of '90s lineup
>V6 CTS
the second one alone is no less than a dozen cars
>>15196964
>>15196967
>entirety of the 90s lineup
not exactly true
>>15196980
>>15196905
I hope not.
>>15196934
If GM made an electric CT6, I would seriously consider whether I like it or the Model S more.
>>15196986
best case scenario would be a plug in hybrid a la volt technology in the CT6 architecture.
>>15196988
>>15196994
>>15196999
>>15197009
>>15196934
>displacement tax
Lol fucking europoors
>>15197025
kek!
>>15196934
>Cadillac
>Marketing
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2014/11/cadillacs-director-brand-reputation-strategy-dont-want-automotive-brand/
>>15196980
>FWD V8 landbarge #401390
>That rebadged Opel
>>15197105
just because you don't like it doesn't mean they were shit
>head gaskets aside
![2001-cadillac-eldorado-westmont-il-i6671717227538789896-3[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/3PjovY8.jpg "2001-cadillac-eldorado-westmont-il-i6671717227538789896-3[1].jpg")
>>15197115
>>15197105
>>15196967
cimarron, catera and cadillac bls all the other 90's cadillac were nice modern last of its kind true landbarges, even the northstar was considered a great engine but it turned out it has headgasket problems
>>15196988
what sexy machine is that
>>15197487
a hartmann bodied 1937 cadillac V16. the thing was astonishing, and massively long
>>15190693
That car makes my asshole clench. I don't know why, but I love this thing. I'd buy one over any Cadillac, bmw, Merc, etc.
>>15190693
it's got that masarati-esque front end/grille
I love it too
>>15196967
>entirety of 90s lineup
If you had the money to repair the Northstars they were fine cars from what I've seen. Its just those god damn head gaskets.
>>15197573
>If you had the money to repair the Northstars they were fine cars from what I've seen
Even though they weren't fast they tried using them in prototypes which was pretty cool.
I'm still mad that Cadillac killed the CT8 in favor of that gaudy piece of shit known as the Escelade. The CT8 would have been a 2016 Fleetwood, It would have been the return of Cadillac back to the high-end luxary market after so many years. But no, gotta sell them Chevy Traverses.
Fucking
>>15197639
They killed off the CT8 cause it would've been a $100,000+ Cadillac and the Escalade* already fits that category. plus, people are slowly moving in favor of the SUV/Crossover (its one of the reasons why nissan was hinting at the release of a Z crossover) for what its worth the Escalade is not a bad car. people like them and i take it they were popular enough that they opened a second plant in Russia just to sell more of them.
They are seen as pretty luxurious and its why they can ask so much for them and sell. All the other automakers trying to make luxury everything are also pushing SUVs hard (such as the Porsche Cayenne) cars like the S-class have been around for a long time and people are already familiar with them. People are also very familiar with the Escalade and would probably buy that over the new CT8 since they would have to spend a bunch of money marketing it and getting it known and that could be really tough especially since they already just introduced the CT6. (who knows they might bring it back after testing the waters with the CT6 if it shows positive results)
>>15197716
>follow the market
The market is full of fuckin idiots who wouldn't know true Luxury if it bit them in their fat asses. The problem still remains that the Escalade is a disgusting gaudy barge. This is the core of my mad, because the CT8 is beautiful, but people would rather have a giant fuckbarge that's literally a rebadged Suburban.
>>15196988
Why not Bolt technology? A full size EV sedan would be cool.
>>15190693
>Volvo
>relevant
>>15197912
>gaudy
I think it's kind of plain looking.
>>15197716
>Americans are still falling for the "redressed Silverado with a trunk is a luxury vehicle" scam 15 years later
>>15200042
I would like the ATS more if it didn't look so boring. :(
>>15200029
>complaining when Rolls-Royces and Bentleys are SUV sized and likely built on SUV frames
>and with the G-class, which was once a working vehicle but is now an overly gaudy town car that's much worse than anything America's done since 2000
face it mate, full-size SUVs have effectively taken the place of full-size sedans and some limos at this point. And they ain't bad to sit in either.
>>15200120
What entry level luxury car doesn't look boring besides the ridiculous predator grill of the IS 250-350 F Sports?
>>15200699
Alfa Romeo Giulia
>>15200705
>Alfa Romeo wouldn’t commit to a definite on-sale date for our market, only saying it’ll be here in the first half of 2016. That timing likely means a 2017-model-year designation. Pricing information hasn’t been released, either, but we’d wager that the 503-hp Giulia Quadrifoglio will require somewhere in the neighborhood of $75,000. At the other end of the spectrum, we’re guessing that the four-cylinder version will check in at just under $40,000 and the non-turbo V-6 at about $50,000.
>>15200699
Model 3. :3
>>15190750
nothing special
interior looks super night though
>>15196969
ayy lmao
>>15188657
That costs the same as a Cadillac from the 90s did back then, holy shit.
WE NEED MORE LED STRIPS RUNNING OFF THE HEADLIGHTS!!! THIS IS THE FUTURE YOU FUCK!!!!!!!
>>15200723
>americans
They should make a v12 one
>>15201055
...shame that this looks so uninspired, since the new MKZ looks gorgeous
Whatever that stupid 'vent' thing is behind the front wheel arch on the Continental is particularly stupid looking.
>>15200811
Nigga that shit aint coming out for like 3 years.
>>15200029
>redressed Silverado with a trunk
It's a Suburban with a different front grill. Literally. And I'm saying this as an American fan of domestics.
>>15201134
I dunno man, I never liked the looks of Ford luxury cars. I always thought that GM was king of style for domestics.
>poor man's S-Class
>>15189300
Oh look a Jag! Good job ferd
>>15200699
Jaguar XE/XF. The Dodge Charger is also pretty cool looking, I'm not sure I'd call it luxury though.
>>15201606
Nuh uh.
>>15188657
>soft white on chrome
>ever
>>15205814
>soft serve on a cone
>ever
>>15200016
because full ev doesn't have the infrastructure and is a choke point. People may be hesitant to buy a tesla purely because of range anxiety.
volt is one of the most technologically advanced vehicles in the last decades. extended range EVs are great. make it RWD and "sporty" like a fisker karma should have been and you'd have a bitching product.
>>15206133
I have a first generation Volt and I plan on replacing it with a Bolt in the near future. The lack of charging stations doesn't bother me because I know it's still a new technology. With the release of the upcoming Bolt, gen 2 Leaf, and Model 3, I predict there will be more charging stations built in the next two years than there has been in all of time.
>>15188657
Looks like another pigfat "luxury" sedan aimed at dumb niggers and trophy wives who value brand name above all else.
>>15206427
>pigfat
And this is how we can tell you're one of those dumb niggers.
>>15207120
Niggers drive Chrysler 300s and bus sized SUVs, you know, pigfat mobiles.
>>15206412
how have you liked the volt?
But it can compete with an S-Class?
>>15206427
lightest in its class.
>>15207851
it's not designed to
>>15188724
>>15188689
>korean shit
Mcfucking end yourself
>>15189300
It literally looks like a Ford Fusion with a bodykit.
>>15201055
Nice Hyundai, what's up with those door handles, they look like my kitchen's cupboard handles.
>>15207809
That's like my favorite concept car ever.
Look at that perfectly blending and rounded greenhouse, the elegant enclosed wheels and the glorious pop-up headlights.
Why future didn't turn out to be as cool as we imagined it in the '80/'90?
>>15210852
I like that desing as well. It would almost belong to any of Syd Mead's art.
>>15190629
dont you mean high price. shit quality
>>15200025
>>I consume cum on a regular basis
That is truly fascinating.
>>15209977
Is that a Roush?
>>15188724
Lol a Hyundai as a serious contender. Go eat a bag a dicks. With kim chee.
>2016
>still shilling for 2nd tier american "luxury"
Just stop trying to get into the luxury market.
I wish Cadillac would make another roadster. The XLR is still one of my favorite cars ever.
>>15212811
stfu scum
>>15212811
Corvette with a bodykit?
>>15188657
>Luxury
>American
Lel good thing they don't try peddle that shit outside of burgerland.. their company would've needed government bail outs a few times
>>15190693
It's almost the same as the fucking Lincoln Continental.
>>15213245
Yeah, but with none of the performance a Corvette has.
>>15212811
If they can make it right. These stickered for around $80k and had mid 2000s DeVille interior.
>>15213268
Buick and Cadillac do pretty fucking well in Asia, Latin American and the middle east. IRL Asians buy more American luxury cars than Americans do.
>>15212765
Spotted the Audi owner with inferiority complex
>>15213245
Current performance Cadillac trims share the same eLSD and/or the supercharged LT4 as the Corvette.
>>15188657
That face of shame.
Looks like it's crying OP
>>15190693
God, that front end looks Chinese.
I know Volvo is owned by a Chinese company now, but I didn't expect them to look like that so quickly.
>>15213646
Ironically the Chinese have been very hands off after they acquired Volvo especially with the XC90 development. They seem to just fund the development of new vehicles rather than mess with Volvo's engineers.
