ITT: cars that are literally shitI'll start
- Home
- Board: /o/ - Auto
- Reading: ITT: cars that are literally shitI'll start
ITT: cars that are literally shit
I'll start
Pretty smart how they saved on ignition costs though.
Everything slower than a PT Cruiser.
>>14990286
Scroll up for the style thread senpai.
>>14990303
at least Cobalt fans don't try to pass off their cars as American.
I'm not a j body guy but the cobalt xfe is rated for 37mpg, and I've heard of people getting 40+mpg in these. Not bad
>>14990286
own one, can confirm
You know it's true.
>>14990725
Whats wrong with it?
>>14990730
everything.
It's ugly, it's not that reliable, doesn't come with a big guarantee, because even VW knows their cars suck. The fanbase is terrible there are cheaper cars that are more fun than the gti.
>>14990730
TURBOCHARGED
FUEL
STRATIFIED
INJECTION
ENGINE
Is shitbox shitposting the new GT-R vs. Corvette?
MIATA.
Leaving before the butt hurt begins
>>14990782
>special snowflake fueling system for a shitbox
forwhatpvrpose.jpg
>>14992102
it's just VW's fancy way of saying it has Direct Fuel Injection.
>>14992114
The FSI is not just direct injection. It has more than one spray pattern for the injectors.
>>14990136
Punto was the better starter car anyway
>>14992124
>not having and Underground 2 save and starting with the Golf
MODS WHY ARE YOU SUCH WORTHLESS CUNTS
>>14990730
Yeah. VWs have terrible reliability. I will never buy one again (had an 06 Jetta TDI). But, the GTI is far from a shitbox.
>>14990180
>40-cent per car savings
>>14990725
Only true post ITT
>>14990218
>Toronto motor sports park
>turbo car
>1:26
that's slow. I know I'm there all the time.
Literally any W body.
every car on this platform
>>14992384
To be fair, the times were set by these cucks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElR3VsTxnF4
![exterior[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/EwUkZvg.jpg "exterior[1]")
