Who wins?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
Who wins?
the S2000 in literally every regard
>>14925132
this
what about current year miats vs s2000
>>14925150
2009 S2000
>237 bhp, 50/50 weight distribution with limited slip differential
2005 Mazdaspeed mx-5 miata
>173 turbo hp with (a shitty) LSD
2016 Mazda mx-5 GT
>155 bhp with no LSD
Not even close
>>14925197
2016 mx5 has an LSD in the club package
honda it actually makes power and when people.
200 whp from a na 2.0(2.2) 4 cylinder.
>>14925216
ignore the
> and when people
part
>>14925210
True.
It's still $28,000 and for that price you can buy an immaculate S2000 which has 60 more hp and is actually designed to race.
>>14925234
>60
*80
>>14925234
no argument there.
used will always be a better value than new
>>14925240
>80
*92
>>14925265
202 actually, at the wheels. When brand new.
>>14925589
alright well we're comparing crank hp to wheel hp then. the miata doesn't make 155 to the wheels.
S2k is the car miata owners wish they had
>>14926066
no, this is
s2k is too pigfat
>>14926151
>s2k
>better base
>still more comfort than lotus
>similar performance
>much better reliability
>cheaper
>>14925132
Except price
>>14926066
>S2k is the car miata owners wish they had
as a miat owner i really don't want an s2k, i'd rather just get an FD Rx-7 or wait for the new Abarth 124
>>14925248
>buying a used s2000
There's no such thing as a clean s2000, every owner beats the shit out of them.
Also a new miata will last you 150-200k miles no problem.
A used s2000 with 80k miles on it will only last you another 70k without needing some major TLC.
>>14926179
>better base
s2k is 750 lbs heavier than an Exige and makes less power. not sure how you think it's a better base. honda fanboyism I suspect
>muh comfort
miatafags don't care. also that is why you have a second comfy car. it's not a daily
>similar performance
kek
>much better reliability
debatable. toyota vs honda for reliability is a tossup
>cheaper
yep
>>14925132
Miata wins in daily driving ability.
Better mpg, cheaper, more common and available new
>>14925197
mx5 has better handling and would win on a tight track
>>14926209
Thats gonna be a bitchin 70k miles tho
>>14926566
Miata has a ton of body roll.
>>14926151
special snow flake aspie brings $50k track car into debate
>>14925127
Saturn. Duh.
>>14926066
This is the absolute truth.
/thread
>>14926204
>denial
>>14925127
honda
>>14925127
I'd say S2K since it has more tuning potential, but Honda isn't even trying anymore, so fuck them.
$35k new s2000 vs $25l new nc miata
$15k todays s2000 prices vs 6-9k todays nc miata prices
Like comparing a 50,000 dollar new car to an 85,000 new car
2/10 B8 MATE
ITT literally 3 anons posting. Including me. And I'm just here laughing at your honda shoebox.
Please, do compare these two. Keep going. It's entertaining.
>>14926566
It can't even beat a slobaru round VIR I don't fancy it's chances against an S2000 on any track.
>>14926993
what...
then compare it to an ND. S2000 still wins nigger.
>>14927050
not on my watch you cuckolded son of a bitch
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2016-mazda-mx-5-vs-2015-subaru-brz-comparison/
>1:29.91 for the MX-5, 1:31.27 for the BRZ.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wC4xAArXCTY
>miata is the faster one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2qL9mmBW4I
>miata is the faster one
now fuck off with your buyers remorse, cuck
>>14927081
So it is a toss up with the second slowest "sports car" in production?
Congrats. Remind me again how it stands a chance against an S2k?
>>14927050
None of those stats are true.........
This is literally a made up false infographic that can be fact checked in seconds.........
>>14927473
Remind me again on how that isn't off topic bait?
>>14927081
Vs 1:35 for an S2000 type s
http://fastestlaps.com/tests/njcangiscpei
honda shit btfo
>>14927863
and the MZR with more hp than regular miat is slower. lmao
>>14927863
>fastest laps
Not hard to find the bus rider
>>14926237
Honda always wins with Toyota when it comes to reliability but that doesn't mean Toyota is bad. It's amazing.
These two just crush all the others.
>>14928029
Project more, ass mad honda fanboy
>>14925127
Everybody wins.
>>14928080
prove it otherwise bus boy. O wait, you can't ;^)
>>14928108
> get mad at facts
> throw butthurt insults around
Roflmao kid stay upset
>>14926209
Bullshit. Mine was immaculate when I got it (Suzuka Blue 2004 bought in '13) and I kept it that way.
And they'll take enthusiastic driving. Sure, you thrash anything or race it and things will break, but these cars aren't fragile.
Biggest two issues to look for are the trans and the power top. Money shift anything when the engine spinning at 8k and damage is gonna occur obv, and the top is the one weirdly over done part of the car and is expensive to replace.
>>14925127
Not really a loser between them but if you can find a clean one and go into it knowing you're getting a ten + year old sports car instead of a brand new one w/ warranty, go for the S2000.
Motor has no torque but it screams once you wind it up, gearbox is a gem, and the interior layout is just about perfect.
It is more oversteer prone at the limit, the top is expensive to replace, and it is a snug fit so be forewarned.
Other than that though its a ten or so year old Honda that just so happens to be a great sports car.
>>14928110
yeah the fact that you're a bus rider
lmao get rekt child
>>14925197
power to weight ratio you fucking retards
>>14925127
Shit taste fag....
>>14925127
S2000 because NA life is best life.
>>14925127
Which car is still around though?
