[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Is performance or appearance more important to you?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto

Thread replies: 126
Thread images: 31
File: Rusted-Dino.png (1 MB, 1024x640) Image search: [Google]
Rusted-Dino.png
1 MB, 1024x640
Is performance or appearance more important to you?
>>
High speed performance depends on appearance to some degree or jet planes wouldn't all look the same. That said, I'd rather drive an Opel Corsa B with a V12 than a Porsche with a threebanger.
>>
File: 1461222380245.jpg (104 KB, 438x292) Image search: [Google]
1461222380245.jpg
104 KB, 438x292
appearance only matters if it's something VERY unappealing to me like a multipla or PR cruiser
fun to drive quickly > power statistics > appearance
>>
looks

I grew out of muh performance when I was 17 or 18 its a really childish thing
>>
File: image19352.jpg (195 KB, 600x400) Image search: [Google]
image19352.jpg
195 KB, 600x400
Appearance usually is cheaper and more stress free than performance. Spirited driving is too exhausting for my liking anyway.
>>
File: ADOBAN.jpg (78 KB, 960x720) Image search: [Google]
ADOBAN.jpg
78 KB, 960x720
>>14901550
Take a guess.

>inb4 stancefaggot

It's shakotan, senpai.
>>
>>14901550
Probably about a 70/30 Function/Form preference.

Form isn't worthless to me but it's definitely not the most important aspect of my car.
>>
>>14901550
did it live?

also what >>14901615 said
>>
File: 6.jpg (277 KB, 800x536) Image search: [Google]
6.jpg
277 KB, 800x536
who /rice/ here?
>>
>>14901670
As far as I can tell it runs and drives but is extremely rotted
>>
Performance, the only appearance is simple aesthetics.

A select few kits look alright, and rocket bunny like wide body modifications can be good. (when not taken to a fucking extreme)
>>
File: image.jpg (11 KB, 165x164) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
11 KB, 165x164
>>14901680
>>
File: 1444587818958.jpg (377 KB, 2300x1528) Image search: [Google]
1444587818958.jpg
377 KB, 2300x1528
>>14901550
>Is performance or appearance more important to you?

sound
>>
That thing has neither
>>
File: 69 panelwagon 1.jpg (66 KB, 562x294) Image search: [Google]
69 panelwagon 1.jpg
66 KB, 562x294
performance c:
>>
>>14901960
>too stupid too quote a post
Should we take your ignorant ass opinion on the race car corvette or ferrari in the op, on which car has nether performance or appearance? You know what, don't hurt yourself, nevermind.
>>
File: car_photo_221164[1].jpg (216 KB, 1200x800) Image search: [Google]
car_photo_221164[1].jpg
216 KB, 1200x800
hehe
>>
i owned a wrx, so performance
>>
>>14901646
>implying it isn't just as stupid
>>
>>14901550

>$12000 OBO no lowballers I know what I have ran when parked no tirekickers RARE
>>
>>14901550

if its a car that I look the look of normally but its just beat up then thats fine

assuming similar performance I'd rather drive that than a brand new car that I don't like the appearance of
>>
>>14902235
12000 would be a great deal for a 246
>>
>>14901550
I went from a nice well maintened 95 3000gt to a 04 WRX wagon

So yeah performance is better for me!
>>
File: Wakos.jpg (63 KB, 960x720) Image search: [Google]
Wakos.jpg
63 KB, 960x720
>>14902230
Well, you might think it's stupid but my point kind of was that shakotan cars have existed since the 70s so it definitely isn't a fad like stance is.
>>
>>14902235
Implying thats a bad deal
>>
>>14901646
Its gay, gaijin
>>
>>14901550
A car could be a performance monster, but any amount of rust is an instant turn off.

Probably looks in terms of maintenance (dents, rust, paint failure), performance then actual exterior design.
>>
File: 6161.jpg (43 KB, 540x540) Image search: [Google]
6161.jpg
43 KB, 540x540
>>14902340
Great! Just the way I like it then.
>>
>>14901646
fuck off shakotanfaggot
>>
File: XXXX.jpg (169 KB, 1080x738) Image search: [Google]
XXXX.jpg
169 KB, 1080x738
>>14902363
I'll fuck you, anon-chan.
>>
File: saab.jpg (915 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
saab.jpg
915 KB, 1024x768
Appearance. I like cars, but I'm also a pretty boring driver. My 9-5 Saab is comfortable to drive, and that's enough for me.
>>
>>14902235
a tidy 246 is a 300k car you ignorant nigger
>>
Depends on a lot. Generally they're both equally important.
>>
I wouldn't buy a donked or riced car but would buy a slow one so appearance probably, if I'm honest with myself
>>
Appearance, because 5 years in architectureal design school twisted my mind and now Im a complete faggot for aesthetics.
>>
>>14903199
>because 5 years in architectureal design school
how do you like your SAAB?
>>
>>14901550
I hate to admit it, but appearance is one of my top priorities.
>>
Performance, otherwise I wouldn't have bought a turbo cobalt ss, not a good looking car but it's fast as fuck, been reliable too
>>
>>14901632
>>Im to old for hobbies

Bet you're real interesting...
>>
File: 1454340225884.jpg (81 KB, 1230x720) Image search: [Google]
1454340225884.jpg
81 KB, 1230x720
>>14901550
My car has neither, but you cannot tow a trailer with appearance. Looks don't matter as long as the car works
>>
Appearance.

While I enjoy speed (a LOT), a very fast vehicle is expensive, a pain in the ass, and can get you into a lot of trouble if you don't watch your right foot like a hawk.

I also just like the stylistic cues on vehicles, and enjoy them being shown off well. A classic look is appreciated.

Hence, appearance.

(although appearance without at least SOME performance is just sad)
>>
>>14903366
You cannot tow a trailer with 1.2 HTP either :^)
>>
>>14903398
Actually you can, it's rated for 1000 kg or 2200 lbs braked at least here in Germany.
>>
>>14903410
Well good fucking luck with that. The engine has problems to move the car.
>>
>>14902235
>complaining about someone telling you it ran when parked
I never got this meme. If he is being honest you know the car was parked for a reason other than the engine being fucked
>>
>>14903410
>rated for 1000 kg
Jesus Christ how embarrassing
>>
>>14903432
Depends on how much of a hurry you're in.
>>
File: 1417993785884.jpg (2 MB, 3479x1873) Image search: [Google]
1417993785884.jpg
2 MB, 3479x1873
Performance
>>
File: 17324587931_dc1c906ee0_o.jpg (1 MB, 1500x1000) Image search: [Google]
17324587931_dc1c906ee0_o.jpg
1 MB, 1500x1000
>>14901550
Sort of in the middle. I prefer a car to be both aesthetically pleasing and fast, but without any obvious performance mods.

Something like this with a quiet exhaust, no special badges, and a turbo kit + built block.
>>
>>14901550
elegance and character is what appeals to me
I don't care if its fast if its boring
nor do I support the idea that a mode of transport that cant move
it has to be a bit of both
the beauty of science and the science of beauty
>>
File: 1456814006119.jpg (39 KB, 467x519) Image search: [Google]
1456814006119.jpg
39 KB, 467x519
>>14903436
>If he is being honest
And there's the rub. The seller is telling you it doesn't run, but should run just fine. You just need to believe them.

You're a fucking idiot if you do. Never buy a car described like that unless you're already planning a drivetrain rebuild. And pay appropriately for it.
>>
>>14903506
You realize you basically agreed with him right? Literally all he said was that it lets you know there wasn't a catastrophic failure
>>
>>14903485
some people would call that a sleeper
>>
>>14901550
Performance. Looks are the most pleb of desires.
>hurr durr look at me in my shiny nice car!
>hurr durr look at me with my extreme stance!
>hurr durr look at me with my edgy fad!

I love sleepers.
>>
>>14903398
>>14903436
800kg braked with 1.4 actually
>>
>>14903576
Pretty much. I've only really seen people use the term in the context of fast dumpy looking cars.
>>
>>14903753
A car needn't be dumpy looking to be a sleeper, it just has to look slow.
>>
>>14901550
Performance, I love the idea of a sleeper car.

My 2008 Leon looks like a totally innocuous standard diesel piece of shit. It has the turbo off the A6, Bigger forced induction kit and an aggressive ECU remap. Tore a 228i a new arsehole last week.
>>
>>14903556
>wasn't a catastrophic failure
that's just what they want you to think and what they mean by running

my main suspicion is that they knew it was on the edge of death when they parked it up
and would rather it become someone else's problem
>>
>>14901953
That's an interesting Elise
>>
>>14903840
>elise
>sounding good
uh, what?

It sounds like just about any 4 cylinder tuner car you run into on the street.
>>
>>14903753
a sleeper is simply an unimposing vehicle with unexpected speed and power.

A shitty car with lots of power is just the extreme of that.
>>
>>14901550
perf, no questions.
>>
>>14901550
Because I'm a faggot, I'm going to say a bit of both mixed with neither. Driver satisfaction is most important.

If the car FEELS fast or fun enough, and I FEEL it looks great, then that's what matters to me. Fuck the other guy's thoughts on what's too slow or too fast or too low or too high or whatever, drive what you want because you want to, and drive it however the fuck you want.

Then again, I admittedly love the rusty, beaten to shit look and would absolutely love to have a car like that Dino just to thrash around and enjoy. Provided everything works on it, who cares if its missing a bumper or two?
>>
I like sleepers and subtlety. Rice is nice when done right, but it still comes second.

>>14901646
Same shit, different asshole.

At least the nips put some effort into their stancefaggotry.
>>
>>14903840
That's a c3 corvette
>>
60/40 with appearance being 60, only because everyone can appreciate a clean looking body.

Performance is great when it comes to auto enthusiasts, but to the common people looks is more important (in my opinion, i may be wrong.)
>>
>>14901646
Ignore the plebs anon, those are some nice SSR MKIII's

>'Pantera' hatch with the スリットスポイラー

good stuff m8
>>
>>14904130
>but to the common people looks is more important
So you're seeking their attention and approval over your own fun then?
>>
Performance.
I don't mind rust, just makes the car a better sleeper
>>
>>14904453
I'm all for sleepers and my car looks pretty rough but rust is a dealbreaker for me. There's a fine line between "just cosmetic" and "the car is fucked and will be a gigantic pain in the ass to fix" with rust.
>>
>>14904280
No, I'm seeking the re-sale value.
>>
File: 1308714384940.jpg (606 KB, 1600x1200) Image search: [Google]
1308714384940.jpg
606 KB, 1600x1200
I like the appearance that comes along with performance.
>>
>>14904497
re-sale value is for jews and quitters
>>
File: zero fucks.jpg (127 KB, 1278x721) Image search: [Google]
zero fucks.jpg
127 KB, 1278x721
performance
>>
>>14904507
a goy being careless with his money is exactly what a jew would want
>>
Performance all the way, but the looks have to be natural patina or rot or faded paint and still acceptable in terms of function. No fucks given cars and rat rods are the worst with tacked on over-the-top extras.
>>
>>14904530
you said performance at first but your entire comment implies looks

would you rather drive a high performance car that you're embarrassed to be seen in or a FWD shitbox that looks like the coolest car you've ever seen.
>>
File: fatlace_showcase_29.jpg (181 KB, 1024x681) Image search: [Google]
fatlace_showcase_29.jpg
181 KB, 1024x681
>>14901646
Baka! That's grachan style!

>tfw no shakotan cressida
>>
File: Fox2.jpg (4 MB, 5312x2988) Image search: [Google]
Fox2.jpg
4 MB, 5312x2988
It's a split for me... love the ability of a built V8, but also having passers-by giving thumbs up or saying "Hey man, like your car" at a stoplight is very ego stroking.
>>
>>14904555
Some day I will own a MX32, For now my 86 MX73 will do.
>>
>>14901550
Majority of /o/ will say performance because they have riced Supras.

In reality looks.. because Im not a faggot
>>
File: IMG_20160417_122346.jpg (2 MB, 2448x2448) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160417_122346.jpg
2 MB, 2448x2448
Personally I just get a car where both come naturally.
>>
>>14905114
>Rice
>Supra

Even a stock supra is a serious car. You may not like the bodykits, but a lot of them have performance applications.

The veilside ones and especially the top secret final evolution one are performance orientated.

>Designed in a wind tunnel to further increase aerodynamics
>Funnels air into the rear brakes and the boot where an intercooler hides
>Increased downforce
>Made of full carbon fibre to shed weight

Rice stands for RACE INSPIRED COSMETIC ENHANCEMENT

Considering the supra is a car you don't fuck with on the streets and that is very often raced, it's not just for show.

And i'm saying this as an aussie muscle fan who loves his v8's, but i'll still give respect to a terrifying car.
>>
>>14905497
god i love smokey's v12 supra. a hypercar that goes toe to toe with modern hypercars (it may not win but it keeps up) 10 years before they were made, in one tuner's shop.

>Perfect weight distribution
>Twin turbo v12
>Puts the power down without shitting itself
>Stupid downforce
>8 pot brakes
>Top speed of 411km/h at highest gear (not achieved because he ran out of road)
>Can actually fucking turn, is not just a straight line monster

Like yea, technology has surpassed it, but the guy's a fucking legend for making this 10 years ago.

Would love to see what he makes with today's tech.
>>
>>14901550
Performance for sure
>>
>>14905497
>>14905523
What's odd is I remember you posting a similar wall of text, then immediately samefagging after in another thread, about the exact same subject. Very strange.
>>
>>14905114

>Majority of /o/ has riced Supras
>prefers looks to performance
>thinks that's not rice

Your post is so wrong it's amazing
>>
>>14905540
not the same guy as the first post but yea i'm kinda reposting the same shit i said earlier.

it's not a copypasta but i have a photographic memory so my shit comes out pretty much the same every time im talking on a subject.

besides, everyone knows about the v12 supra, it's a pretty cool car to discuss.
>>
>>14905551
>Majority of /o/ has supras

Yea no.

Ontop of that, a completely stock one is 5 sec to 100. That's no joke.
Most supras only need a bit of minor work to get up to 500hp.

Considering it already has the power to take a lot of cars on the road, i don't blame people for making their car look nice as well.

Also, you fucking moron, read the actual definition of rice. These bodykits have performance benefits to them, thus they do not count as rice.
>>
>>14905551
>everyone has a fairly rare car

this is how we know you're a moron.
>>
>>14905551
Do you even know the definition of rice?
>>
>>14905573

>not reading the post I'm quoting

Who's the moron now, anon?
>>
performance

driveability and engine health is crucial, paint can wait, body rust isn't as bad as structural rust and the interior can usually be tidied up fairly cheap and inexpensively
>>
>>14905569

Jesus christ you guys are retarded, I was literally quoting a faggot who said the majority of /o/ had supras
>>
>>14905586
To be fair, your greentext comes across as you making that statement. Clarify better if you're a different guy from the original moron. My bad.
>>
>>14905591
Thought the same as this guy >>14905594 that you were claiming everyone has supras, sorry.

Which is a fucking retarded statement, not only are they a high performance car that's the direct opposite of rice, they're also expensive and out of the reach of ricers.

Plus, the bodykits are made of carbon fibre (if you're buying a good one) and are performance orientated.
>>
>>14905632

Nah man. Since everyone got it wrong I guess I fucked up my post, but I was trying to point out how stupid that line was when the first guy said it. Guess I just suck at greentext
>>
>>14905650
all good man, join us in laughing at his fucking stupidity.

>Actually thinks one of the most respected cars on the street is rice.

Here's some videos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6PJA9tb66E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYekRojG2Dw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJNW_Yt3sJk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BACxmVx74OI
>>
>>14905669
the 2jz is legendary

Rest of the car ain't bad either, it got a great skidpad rating and has near perfect weight distribution from factory.

It's a lil heavy but as your videos show, that does not matter.
>>
>>14903269
muh performance isnt a hobby

its for fucktard kids and thats about it
the looks and feel of a car is more important
>>
>>14906410
>"I cannot afford fast cars, nor can I drive them. Therefor I call anyone who does and can children and enjoy my minivan because it's so comfortable or my stance shitbox because #vape4life and #stancelife lol performance is for kids."

Dude, you need to quit projecting this hard. The poorness is almost blinding.
>>
>>14906425
dude

youre projecting hard right there

fucktard kid detected
>>
>>14906428
Bet you're one of those little bitches who owns a minivan and drives like a fuccboi
Bet you have never ever even gone to a track day.
>>
>>14906448
>track day meme
>fuccboi

>>>/carthrottle/
>>>/jalopnik/
>>>/facebook/

thanks for confirming my assumption
>>
>>14901550
Appearance.
I don't enjoy speeding very much. The car only has to feel nippy in city traffic.
>>
>>14906457
Your assumption that my 16 year old sister without a licence handles a car better than you do.
I am willing to bet you have a stanced BMW.
>>
>>14901550
Performance.
The best way to see the world is at 160mph.
I mean, why live if you can't into FAST.
>>
File: black-gq-tough-dog-2-640.jpg (317 KB, 640x448) Image search: [Google]
black-gq-tough-dog-2-640.jpg
317 KB, 640x448
What does this board think of the GQ Patrols?

I am looking to buy a TD42 Turbo GQ Patrol at the moment and they're quite hard to come by. Personally I like the sharp look about them and the torque the engine supplies.

What about you guys?
>>
File: 1443035019358.gif (1 MB, 346x261) Image search: [Google]
1443035019358.gif
1 MB, 346x261
>>14901550
>all these cucks who are worried about what someone on the street thinks about their car or them

This is why you're all such fucking failures at life.
>>
>>14906470
now youre not even making sense

kids usually cant
>>
>>14906494
>using kids as insult
>>
>>14906538
>being offended by it

sorry kid

when you grow up youll realize how much of a cringey faggot you are
>>
File: 1459754603142.jpg (59 KB, 540x509) Image search: [Google]
1459754603142.jpg
59 KB, 540x509
>>14906542
What can mankind do against such reckless faggotry?
>>
>>14906410
>feel of a car
also known as performance.
>>
File: 1435103598339.jpg (39 KB, 585x398) Image search: [Google]
1435103598339.jpg
39 KB, 585x398
>>14906410
>>
>>14906733
No it's not. A car can have super performance but not any feel except g-forces.
You have to be dumb to make that assumption.
>>
>>14901550

Performance.
>>
>>14902385

I think that falls under performance more than appearance...
>>
>>14902385
Either youre a old fag, or this car is owned by your dad, "Fordonet ägs av en man född 1971 (45 år gammal i år"
>>
Performance and weight >appearance
Once you go light you never go back.
>>
File: file0042-1mo[1].jpg (143 KB, 650x488) Image search: [Google]
file0042-1mo[1].jpg
143 KB, 650x488
>>14906481
Same here, looking for a 3 door Y60.
>>
>>14902327
That poor Mk II
>>
>>14906481
Solid performers, pretty reliable. I wish I had that kind of power in my old Paj.
>>
Appearance over performance. But it cant be lacking too much in performance. Reason is that you can always show off appearance while you can only sometimes show off performance.
>>
comfy and passing power is all that matters
Thread replies: 126
Thread images: 31

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.