>slower than the *2012* Camaro 1LE
Hmmmmmm
>>14824688
>iPad
>>14824688
How is it slower than a 2012 when it beats a 2016SS?
>>14824688
actually considering the fact that they did not tested the M performance package, and that the difference is .03 its safe to assume the M performance package will be faster
Why is it always an iFag that shitposts the loudest?
>>14824746
The 1LE is a cheap, yet effective performance package. They haven't announced the 2017 price yet, but it should be like $3,500 and would make the Camaro SS absolutely smoke both Beemers.
>>14824746
Because a 2012 1LE is faster than a 2016 SS. It's basically Chevy's track package. However, a 2016 1LE will likely be quicker than a 2012 1LE.
>>14824762
2016 M4 with M pack will be on par with a 2012 1LE then - but it'll be slower than a 2016 1LE.
>>14824688
Luxury car slower than Track preped car shocker.
>>14824851
>fake plastics
>fewer interior features than a Hyundai Elantra
>non leather seats
M2 is not a luxury car.
>>14824880
Ohhh I can tast the salt from here.
>>14824851
Track focused version of a luxury car slower than a track focused version of a pony car.
1LE - Goodyear Supercar G2:
>treadwear rating 220
M2 - Michelin PSS:
>treadwear rating 300
>>14824688
everyone knows the new bmws are shit and the generally dislike them this shitpost is getting old
>>14824880
m2 has leather you fag. in fact its all you can get and standard. are you actually retarded?
>>14824962
ecept the m2 is not the track focused version
>>14825242
what do these numbers mean and matter, thanks
>>14825585
The lower the treadwear rating the stickier the tire usually.
>>14825585
>The treadwear grade is a comparative rating based on the wear of a tire when tested carefully under controlled conditions. For example the useful tread on a tire graded 400 should last twice as long as a tire graded 200.
>all these benchracers
lmao
keep in mind, the camaro devaluates way faster than the M2 will.
>look at where the 1M is now.
![9ae[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Moo9UXA.jpg "9ae[1].jpg")
>>14825324
>he thinks leather makes a car luxury
kekkest of the keks
>arguing about cars you will never afford
>>14827096
LOL
>>14827096
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=molJ-Bn_e9c
>>14827096
>Posting pictures of girls that you will never touch.
>>14827129
>touching girls
>>14827150
I'm the product of r9k, I can only dream to touch a girl : ' (
>Yuropoors this Assblasted
>>14827052
so you are an idiot or a liar?
>>14827096
speak for yourself neet. my next car is likely going to be an m2 unless i somehow can accept the pigfatness of the domestic offerings.
>>14825736
>keep in mind, the camaro devaluates way faster than the M2 will.
It loses value faster than the 1M did, but slower than the M4 does. The question is, will the M2 lose value like a 1M or like a M4.
Since the 1M was an intentionally limited production auto, and BMW will make an M2 for anyone who wants one, I suspect it's depreciation curve will be closer to the M4's.
After all the shit posting by Europoors in Camaro threads they are in absolute maximum damage control right now holy shit. My fucking sides right now.
>BMW makes cars great again
>Americlaps all asspained their Canadian supercar isn't the fastest thing out there and are literally arguing over $5,000 difference in MSRP forgetting how much their cars tank in resale
GM: I TRIED SO HARD AND LOST IT ALL
IN THE END IT DOESN'T EVEN MATTER
>>14828396
>1M
>losing value at all
>>14824688
>motortrend
They don't even know how to drive otherwise that GTR would have 3 seconds on the vette
>>14824783
>>14824794
The M4 has a $3000 Competition package which makes the car notably faster. And the M2 will have a CSL version which will make the M2 faster.
>slower than A FUCKING JAGUAR
>>14824688
M4 beats 5 year older Mustang by less than half a second. New Mustang is even faster around a track and would have almost certainly beaten the M2/4 times.
anons still pretend mustangs cant turn.
>>14831640
needs a $3000 competition to do better than beating a 5 year old mustang by less than half a second
lol
>>14831640
>needing to spend $70k + $3k to beat a 4 year old $15k Camaro
T O P K E K
O
P
K
E
K
>>14831640
Face it Davis, BMW isn't the best at anything anymore. Yes, they're good at the track and they're good at being comfy, but they're not the best at either.
>>14825242
This. Honestly alot of the times come down to the tires they run on the cars. I get that they run them how they come out of the factory, but it would be pretty interesting to see how they compare on the same tire
will americucks EVER be able to deal with the camaro being slower?
>>14831675
The competition package has not set any lap times. Also if the bmw's had DCT transmissions the lap times would have improved by at least 1-2 seconds.
>>14831683
Nah but the comp package M4 and the CSL M2 will beat the upcoming 1LE.
>>14831699
>Save $15k on Camaro
>Use $1.5k on gr8 tires
>Chad goes back to ye olde "muh passion, muh feels" arguments
>>14832006
>modern german cars
>having either passion or feels
>>14827129
#rekt
>>14832420
Why do you think BMW fags are so hyped about the M235i and M2?
It's the first BMW with actual feels since the E46 M3/Z4M. BMWfags are the biggest critics of their brand, just like Honda they peaked in the late 1990s/early 2000s.
>>14832006
>spend 75k modifying a camaro
>run 17's
top kek
>>14831510
That's the point...
>>14831200
>forgetting how much their cars tank in resale
German car fans, everyone.
>>14832858
E36 was the best chasis followed by e46
