So 5L v8 for a decent price. Do i pull my trigger on the 2016 model?
Wait a couple years, buy it lightly used while still under warranty and save 25%
Yes, buy one
>>14792665
Do it fgt
camaro is objectively better
>>14792688
The Mustang doesn't look like a toy and you can actually see out of it. I want to like the Camaro but I just can't
>>14792665
I can't. They're good cars if you can deal with the boyracer stigma.
>>14792717
In all fairness the boyracers are mostly corralled in the V6/I4 models.
>tfw no pony car with mustang exterior but with camaro chassis, engine, and interior
>>14792692
The new Camaros looks pretty dope but the windows are ridiculous
>>14792732
God damn I'd buy that in a heartbeat; the S550 interior isn't bad per se but the Camaro is a lot comfier feeling.
>>14792723
only because they can't afford a GT
fuck all that though. it's a good car for what it is.
>>14792732
>camaro interior
Have they stop putting the cobalt interior in the Corvette yet?
OP here I'll buy the GT after test driving the camaro SS. I agree that GT suffers from american interior syndrome... but still a great car regardless
>>14792692
>the mustang doesn't look like a toy
>>14792808
Those engines for that generation unlike the S197 and earlier aren't total dogshit but yes, they're bought mostly by idiots who just want to blog about their "stang" on Facebook.
>>14792837
It doesn't, do you have a point here?
drove a friends 2014 burger gt/cs
the clutch is amazing, the new 5.0l is gr8 tq is gud the thing opens up like mad. handled pretty decent in the small bit of cornering I got to play with. turning radius wasnt gr8. but it was a good car and thats w/o the IRS. GET ONE its alot of fun.
>>14792665
>Any V8 smaller than 5 liters.
>>14794873
I have a 1UZ.. pls no bully.
>>14795609
1UZ unmodified is really awful. 3UZ is the engine you want. Good on fuel and 300hp standard.
>>14792678
This. Just keep waiting for them to depreciate, but never actually buy one.
>>14795614
I have the VVT-i 300HP 310 Torque.
>>14792858
My point is that it looks like a toy
>>14795627
I stand corrected, better educated carbro.
>>14792837
>>14792665
Do it. I bought the eco and I love it.
>>14797334
eco
>Camaro
That gawdawful interior. Those tank slit windows.
>>14792837
>>14797617
I'm actually going to that this year. It's a mustang show in PA and I want to show off my turbo foxbody. About 2000 people bring mustangs to it, they have dynos and a 1/8 mile strip, it's cool.
>>14792665
No. Wait for the 2017 GT model. It'll have a gorilla glass windshield.
>>14797689
got pics of your turbo foxbody? I would love to see
>>14797689
>turbo fox body
Pics?
>>14797617
Makes hot rodding a no brainer. You can just point and click your way to whatever you want. Just add money.
Try that with a Nissan. Nowhere near as easy.
>>14797355
>camaro has a bad interior
Do it, if don't care about money at all
>>14794873
McLaren and Konnigobogo btfo I guess
>>14798117
I sat in one. It's really fucking good. Only shitty plastic is on top of the gauges.
>>14797704
>>14797709
I haven't put the turbo in yet. I have every weekend this month blocked off for it and my brother is coming over to help. It's gonna be a bitch but i got an arc welder and the tubing pre-formed so it shouldn't be too hard.
>>14798740
this is out of a massive diesel pickup from the junkyard and i've tested it. I'll have to see how it holds up.
>>14798756
Cool! Getting old diesel turbos seems like the cheapest way to get a reliable turbo until the Chinese eBay ones get better
>>14792678
>save $3000 for used goods
Serious question. Why get the V8 Mustang when you can by the Ecoboost instead, for 10k less and be able to tune it for less than 500 dollars so it's faster than the V8?
>>14799562
Because muh vee-ate feels, and it might take more money, but the GT is purely a better car.
>>14799562
Because it's not really a mustang if it's not a v8.
>>14798740
CLEAN.
>>14799562
>things ricers believe
>>14798699
which is a good spot to save it because we don't ever use that section and you can't really tell unless you try your ass off.
>>14795609
>>14795614
1UZ is god tier.
>>14795627
This.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtEn7rdqLTs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id77MGuM-7k
>>14797311
goddamn how is that pony not bottoming out?
>>14797355
Better than the Mustang. Mustang's interior *looks* okay, but there's lots of hard plastic that scratches easily. And if you get the leather seats, the leather wrinkles on the bolsters, a sign that the seats will look like shit in a few years.
>>14798117
That frameless rear view mirror is so sexy. I want it in my Volt. I wonder if it will fit...
Just dish out the extra cash for a Scat Pack R/T Challenger. There's only a $6k difference in base prices.
>>14800674
Indeed anon,
that's why I picked the 1UZ over the 2JZ.
>>14797334
> ECO
>>14799396
$8,750
>>14798117
It's meh imo. The materials may be nicer but the design is just too weird, I hate the gauge cluster particularly. And I'm a huge delusional GM fanboy
>>14799562
Because it will literally, figuratively and metaphorically sound like someone straining while taking a shit
>>14803242
As someone who always liked Mustangs over the equivalent Camaro, that interior is a lot fucking comfier and nice; the S550 Mustang reeks of OMG TECHNOLOGY SHINY.
As you said, the windows ruin it, though
>>14803261
Don't get me wrong, I'd still pick the Camaro and I would probably get used to the interior anyway. I really like the new Mustang tho
>>14803314
In a perfect world I'd have the Mustang exterior and Camaro everything else. The new Mustang is great, I just don't like the interior although it is a massive step up from the S197
>>14803174
maybe even more
Like they are rentals they depreciate like crazy
>>14803336
I'd also like Ford to actually own the car given GM being GM and all.
>>14803336
Honestly, as a Camaro fan its hard to admit, but the Mustang interior actually seems a little bit better in terms of layout.
>>14803898
I'll agree, I just don't like the Mustang interior at all.
Im gonna buy a 2015 when the prices get a little lower. i plan on smoking all ricers and boosting it. shit will be cash
>>14798117
>our A-pillars will block out the sun
>then we shall drive in the shade
>>14799562
>cause dat sound with a nice exhaust
>>14802403
OP wanted a car, not a boat.
>>14792688
They are ugly as fuck though.
>>14798117
absolutely disgusting
>>14792678
This. I bought a 2014 v6 with 14,500 miles on it for $15,500.
>>14811550
relevant picture
>>14811550
>V6
Why the almighty fuck would you do this
Should of bought an older V8 or waited a couple years for prices to drop on the Boostang
>>14792665
No. Wait till the 17 model yr. New transmissions and a power increase.
>>14811550
>2014
>V6
Why? I mean those V6s aren't that slow, but the V8 is so much better. And that's the year right before IRS.
>>14811601
Why would I buy an older car with more miles than an almost new v6 that performs nearly as well? Sure it's not the v8 but the new v8 is nearly as fast as the 2010 and later v8, while also having all the modern tech.
>>14811588
That's a nice mustang my bro but, in your shoes i would have gone for a 2011 or 2012 v6 manual with the performance package, they are selling for about 11 to 13k nowadays and most of them have like 60k miles.
>>14798117
chevvy is so embarrassed by their own name they have to type in the name of the car on the steering wheel
>>14811947
I call BS, saw mustangs fitting that description costing about 15 - 16k
