Chrysler Crossfire thoughts?
- Home
- Board: /o/ - Auto
- Reading: Chrysler Crossfire thoughts?
Hi goys I'm thinking of getting a 2005 crossfire for $6500 USD. It's a 6speed base model which i don't mind since it'll be my highway car Anyone have experience with this car? I really like the looks and mpgs don't matter to me desu. Any help guys?
>>14765853
Inb4 pooping dog
Bump
>>14765853
Lol
>>14765853
Chrysler x Mercedes = double garbage
Anyone besides retards wanna give me advice?
It's almost identical to an 05 SLK.
My 05 crossy was a good car.
Pigfat
its an 05 SLK but it looks gay
so it looks gay, two manufacturers with piss poor reliability if you dont have money
it moves ok i guess
>>14766102
Actually it's almost identical to the first gen SLK, not the second gen.
>>14767781
SLKs look far worse than Crossfires.
No SRT = No thanks
>>14767781
>its an 05 SLK but it looks gay
R171 looks disgusting an easily the worst SLK. As if they took all the worst styling elements from the SLR and crammed it into a small roadster. The Crossfire actually looks far better.
>>14765853
I suggest you pass on it.
Only the SRT models are worth a damn the major reason for that is because of their rarity giving it something of a collectors' value.
Literally does nothing better than the 350Z. Not power, handling, economy, reliability, maintenance costs, nothing.
>>14767822
>no SRT
>wanting an auto
>>14767992
I've read online that it's a very reliable car aside from a couple issues that have been heavily documented on forums. Anyone here ever owned one?
