Small V8s
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
What does /o/ think of small V8 engines like audis 3.7l?
That's not particularly small.
>>14760764
>small v8
bueno.jpg
>audi
fuck fuck fuck
>>14760764
>3.7L
>small
It's got the same displacement per cylinder as an average inline-4.
Actual small V8 coming in
>1951 Ford Pilot
>2.2L Ford Flatty
It's not the size that matters, its how you use it
>>14760793
like my dick.
Wanting to own a supercharged 3.5L Rover V8 someday desu.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=n9VJCtqtnsI
>>14760804
>Buy MOT failure Range Rover for £500
>Buy supercharger off ebay for same
>Supercharged offroad toy
The RR V8s are low compression as well so you can run reasonable boost before you need special fuel
>>14760812
they are low compression but the inefficient combustion chamber means they're not low enough.
not a problem, just stick some 4.6 heads on a 3.5.
>>14760848
4.6 has 94mm bore, 3.6 has 89mm
on paper its sexy
irl it's anemic, lower longevity than a v8 that was engineered with an actual amount of displacement
fuel mileage suck compared to a larger v8 that doesn't have to be in it's powerband t move the vehicle around
>>14760764
>small v8
>dohc
pick one
I'd rather have my timing chain time bomb 4.2
>3.7L V8
>small
The RA271 would like to have a word with you
ITT: I stop referring to my 302 as a small block
lol jk
BMW made a 530i with a V8
A 3.0L V8 is KIND of small, but not really.
Smallest v8, 600cc.
>>14764463
the NSX had a 3.2 v6. so yes that is pretty fucking small
>>14764441
>lol buttmad 3.7 isn't the smallest
Read the fucking thread boi, op's talking about small v8s, not the smallest ever made
>>14764496
3.7L isn't small.
That's more displacement per cylinder than a NA6 Miata.
>>14764463
A 3.0 has 375 cc per cylinder, and if you pass that to a I4 , you get 1.5l, so it isn't that small, but neither that big
>>14764509
Yeah, it's kind of small, but there are definitely smaller.
![f1engines6[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/X2Hzyxo.jpg "f1engines6[1].jpg")
I was a big fan of the 2.4 liter V8's in F1. 2.4 liters is pretty small and churning out 750HP at 18,000 is pretty fucking sweet.
![2arielatom[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/x1VyiAc.jpg "2arielatom[1].jpg")
>>14764411
pushrod cucks need not to apply
>>14764646
>implying they need to fill out an application
>>14764621
>million dollar engine
>>14764685
ill apply lotion in their mum's butt
i consider my 5.7l small.
>>14764723
5.7cm is pretty tiny desu
>>14764761
For you
What does /o/ think of big boomer mobile engines like this 7.5 l ?
>>14764919
lol130hp
>>14764723
I consider my dodge with a 360 pretty small too.
>>14760764
i think they are breddy awesome
>>14764919
A big money sink if you want any kind of performance from them.
>>14764919
owned by retards who think technological progress doesn't exist
