What does /o/ think about the Fiat 500X?
Call me crazy but I think it's actually a pretty nice looking car, and for whatever reason I can't stand the look of the normal 500
Does anyone have one?
What's it like to live with?
>FWD
Nice Jeep, op.
>>14751190
AWD bruh
>>14751190
I just googled it. You're fucking right! Are you some some car expert?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fiat
It's like a fat, tall 500.
Well put together actually, looks good for a CUV (opinions lol) quite spacious, easy on fuel, some of the normal 500 aftermarket stuff is a straight fit to the 500x, quite nice to drive (for its size obviously) can handle fire roads and grass as well as any other CUV can because
>senpai I-I am fwd but for you I would try to be AWD i-if you would like me more then :3
>>14751190
>implying RWD isn't useless with < 200 hp
>Implying you actually meed a RWD crossover
>Implying you give a shit about traction when stuck in traffic or driving around town
Grow up kiddo
It's a 500 made to look like it can go offroad but actually can't. Please don't fall for it op, don't be part of the problem.
>>14751228
m8 seriously. you can rage about muh rwd in almost every thread on /o/ but this isn't one. what are you doing here.
>>14751230
I'm not looking for an offroader, I'm looking for something like a 500 but with more legroom because >6'4"
>>14751181
A Fiat made on a Jeep platform.
<irony>Yeah. It'll be good.</irony>
>>14751250
I doubt it will be much roomier.
>>14751252
No, you stupid retarded piece of shit.
The base is the FGA small platform introduced with Fiat Punto in 2005 and now at the second generation.
It's a Jeep made on Fiat platform and according to high sales both cars are good.
>b-but muh consumer report charts
>biased and useless
>>14751268
are you kidding?
it's like twice the size
>>14751288
> damage control so hard
Why so mad fiat cuck?
>>14751181
>wanting a crossover
Are you a woman?
>>14751228
RWD is objectively superior.
>>14751331
side wheel drive is much more objectively superior
>>14751181
It's a pretty good car for the prize. Better offroad-capabilities than most SUVs out there. Also nice looks. Would buy.
>>14751331
It is but with less than 200 hp on a normal day car it's useless and you can't feel the difference at all.
I'm not talking about specialties like Miata and Brz made ad-hoc, we're talking about a crossover made for the city.
Also if the car would have been RWD it would have been also more expensive, and so...
What about the Mini countryman? No complains about that?
>>14751341
>it's not a broken dif, I've invented a new drive system
>>14752120
left or right wheels are to be discussed yet!
